From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
To: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
Cc: christian.loehle@arm.com, tj@kernel.org, pavel@kernel.org,
len.brown@intel.com, rafael@kernel.org, kernel-dev@igalia.com,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, sched-ext@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v4 07/10] PM: EM: Implement em_nl_get_pd_table_doit()
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2025 11:01:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <23fe1144-eecc-4e7d-aef7-9b6370d0e24a@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250921031928.205869-8-changwoo@igalia.com>
On 9/21/25 04:19, Changwoo Min wrote:
> When a userspace requests EM_CMD_GET_PD_TABLE with an ID of a performancei
s/performancei/performance/
> domain, the kernel reports back the energy model table of the specified
> performance domain. The message format of the response is as follows:
>
> EM_A_PD_TABLE_PD_ID (NLA_U32)
> EM_A_PD_TABLE_PS (NLA_NESTED)*
> EM_A_PS_PERFORMANCE (NLA_U64)
> EM_A_PS_FREQUENCY (NLA_U64)
> EM_A_PS_POWER (NLA_U64)
> EM_A_PS_COST (NLA_U64)
> EM_A_PS_FLAGS (NLA_U64)
>
> where EM_A_PD_TABLE_PS can be repeated as many times as there are
> performance states (struct em_perf_state).
>
> Signed-off-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
> ---
> kernel/power/em_netlink.c | 108 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 107 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/power/em_netlink.c b/kernel/power/em_netlink.c
> index 31b27c6fe3c9..59953cfedf78 100644
> --- a/kernel/power/em_netlink.c
> +++ b/kernel/power/em_netlink.c
> @@ -102,9 +102,115 @@ int em_nl_get_pds_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static struct em_perf_domain *__em_nl_get_pd_table_id(struct nlattr **attrs)
> +{
> + struct em_perf_domain *pd;
> + int id;
> +
> + if (!attrs[EM_A_PD_TABLE_PD_ID])
> + return NULL;
> +
> + id = nla_get_u32(attrs[EM_A_PD_TABLE_PD_ID]);
> + pd = em_perf_domain_get_by_id(id);
> + return pd;
> +}
> +
> +static int __em_nl_get_pd_table_size(const struct em_perf_domain *pd)
> +{
> + int id_sz, ps_sz;
> +
> + id_sz = nla_total_size(sizeof(u32)); /* EM_A_PD_TABLE_PD_ID */
> + ps_sz = nla_total_size(0) + /* EM_A_PD_TABLE_PS */
> + nla_total_size_64bit(sizeof(u64)) + /* EM_A_PS_PERFORMANCE */
> + nla_total_size_64bit(sizeof(u64)) + /* EM_A_PS_FREQUENCY */
> + nla_total_size_64bit(sizeof(u64)) + /* EM_A_PS_POWER */
> + nla_total_size_64bit(sizeof(u64)) + /* EM_A_PS_COST */
> + nla_total_size_64bit(sizeof(u64)); /* EM_A_PS_FLAGS */
> + ps_sz *= pd->nr_perf_states;
> +
> + return nlmsg_total_size(genlmsg_msg_size(id_sz + ps_sz));
> +}
> +
> +static int __em_nl_get_pd_table(struct sk_buff *msg, const struct em_perf_domain *pd)
> +{
> + struct em_perf_state *table, *ps;
> + struct nlattr *entry;
> + int i;
> +
> + if (nla_put_u32(msg, EM_A_PD_TABLE_PD_ID, pd->id))
> + goto out_err;
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + table = em_perf_state_from_pd((struct em_perf_domain *)pd);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < pd->nr_perf_states; i++) {
> + ps = &table[i];
> +
> + entry = nla_nest_start(msg, EM_A_PD_TABLE_PS);
> + if (!entry)
> + goto out_unlock_ps;
> +
> + if (nla_put_u64_64bit(msg, EM_A_PS_PERFORMANCE,
> + ps->performance, EM_A_PS_PAD))
> + goto out_cancel_ps_nest;
> + if (nla_put_u64_64bit(msg, EM_A_PS_FREQUENCY,
> + ps->frequency, EM_A_PS_PAD))
> + goto out_cancel_ps_nest;
> + if (nla_put_u64_64bit(msg, EM_A_PS_POWER,
> + ps->power, EM_A_PS_PAD))
> + goto out_cancel_ps_nest;
> + if (nla_put_u64_64bit(msg, EM_A_PS_COST,
> + ps->cost, EM_A_PS_PAD))
> + goto out_cancel_ps_nest;
> + if (nla_put_u64_64bit(msg, EM_A_PS_FLAGS,
> + ps->flags, EM_A_PS_PAD))
> + goto out_cancel_ps_nest;
> +
> + nla_nest_end(msg, entry);
> + }
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + return 0;
> +
> +out_cancel_ps_nest:
> + nla_nest_cancel(msg, entry);
> +out_unlock_ps:
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> +out_err:
> + return -EMSGSIZE;
> +}
> +
> int em_nl_get_pd_table_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
> {
> - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + struct sk_buff *msg;
> + struct em_perf_domain *pd;
> + void *hdr;
> + int cmd = info->genlhdr->cmd;
> + int msg_sz, ret = -EMSGSIZE;
Please put them in the reverse christmas tree order.
> +
> + pd = __em_nl_get_pd_table_id(info->attrs);
> + if (!pd)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + msg_sz = __em_nl_get_pd_table_size(pd);
> +
> + msg = genlmsg_new(msg_sz, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!msg)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + hdr = genlmsg_put_reply(msg, info, &em_nl_family, 0, cmd);
> + if (!hdr)
> + goto out_free_msg;
> +
> + ret = __em_nl_get_pd_table(msg, pd);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out_free_msg;
> +
> + genlmsg_end(msg, hdr);
> + return genlmsg_reply(msg, info);
> +
> +out_free_msg:
> + nlmsg_free(msg);
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static int __init em_netlink_init(void)
After fixing that cosmetic thing you can add:
Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-10 10:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-21 3:19 [PATCH RESEND v4 00/10] PM: EM: Add netlink support for the energy model Changwoo Min
2025-09-21 3:19 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 01/10] PM: EM: Assign a unique ID when creating a performance domain Changwoo Min
2025-10-06 8:17 ` Lukasz Luba
2025-10-06 12:24 ` Lukasz Luba
2025-10-13 13:46 ` Changwoo Min
2025-09-21 3:19 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 02/10] PM: EM: Expose the ID of a performance domain via debugfs Changwoo Min
2025-10-06 14:26 ` Lukasz Luba
2025-09-21 3:19 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 03/10] PM: EM: Add an iterator and accessor for the performance domain Changwoo Min
2025-10-06 15:14 ` Lukasz Luba
2025-09-21 3:19 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 04/10] PM: EM: Add em.yaml and autogen files Changwoo Min
2025-10-06 15:25 ` Lukasz Luba
2025-09-21 3:19 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 05/10] PM: EM: Add a skeleton code for netlink notification Changwoo Min
2025-10-06 15:44 ` Lukasz Luba
2025-10-13 13:46 ` Changwoo Min
2025-10-13 13:53 ` Lukasz Luba
2025-10-13 14:43 ` Changwoo Min
2025-09-21 3:19 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 06/10] PM: EM: Implement em_nl_get_pds_doit() Changwoo Min
2025-10-10 9:32 ` Lukasz Luba
2025-09-21 3:19 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 07/10] PM: EM: Implement em_nl_get_pd_table_doit() Changwoo Min
2025-10-10 10:01 ` Lukasz Luba [this message]
2025-10-13 13:47 ` Changwoo Min
2025-09-21 3:19 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 08/10] PM: EM: Implement em_notify_pd_deleted() Changwoo Min
2025-10-10 10:17 ` Lukasz Luba
2025-09-21 3:19 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 09/10] PM: EM: Implement em_notify_pd_created/updated() Changwoo Min
2025-10-10 10:19 ` Lukasz Luba
2025-09-21 3:19 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 10/10] PM: EM: Notify an event when the performance domain changes Changwoo Min
2025-10-10 10:20 ` Lukasz Luba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=23fe1144-eecc-4e7d-aef7-9b6370d0e24a@arm.com \
--to=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
--cc=kernel-dev@igalia.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®