mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Bojan Smojver" <bojan@rexursive.com>
To: rjw@sisk.pl
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8]: Improve performance of LZO/plain hibernation
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 22:00:28 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2409186928.1003010428@rexursive.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201110062045.48689.rjw@sisk.pl>

------- Original message -------
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki

>> I get a kernel panic on a test box using a x86_64 kernel with this patch
>> applied.
>
> The panic happens during late resume, when trying to switch to the 
> hibernated
> kernel.

In an effort to test this whole thing a bit more, I took today's kernel 
from Linus' repo and applied v11 of my patch. I compiled this on a single 
cpu machine this time, with 768 MB of memory (in today's terms, this laptop 
would not pass as a smartphone :-), running F-16 beta.. The system has 
radeon graphics (my other system, where I initially developed the patch, 
has intel). Also, this was a 32-bit box, as opposed to my other system, 
which is 64-bit.

I was getting kernel trouble on repeated hibernate/thaw cycles on both 
systems when KMS was enabled. With nomodeset passed into the kernel, both 
systems would go through 50+ cycles (this was my test loop) with no 
trouble. Whether my patch was applied or not didn't matter - I was getting 
trouble with Fedora supplied kernels as well, after a few cycles.

So, I don't know for sure, but it seems to me something is amiss in KMS 
when it comes to hibernation.

--
Bojan 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-10-13 11:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-30  0:27 Bojan Smojver
2011-10-04 22:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-10-05  1:07   ` Bojan Smojver
2011-10-06 18:37     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-10-06 18:45       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-10-06 22:23         ` Bojan Smojver
2011-10-07  3:20         ` Bojan Smojver
2011-10-07  3:39         ` Bojan Smojver
2011-10-07 23:33         ` Bojan Smojver
2011-10-09  2:57         ` Bojan Smojver
2011-10-09  7:54           ` Bojan Smojver
2011-10-09  9:22         ` Pekka Enberg
2011-10-09 10:19           ` Bojan Smojver
2011-10-09 22:24             ` Bojan Smojver
2011-10-10  7:12             ` Bojan Smojver
2011-10-13 11:00         ` Bojan Smojver [this message]
2011-10-13 21:26           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-10-13 21:44             ` Bojan Smojver
2011-10-13 21:57               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-10-13 21:56                 ` Bojan Smojver
2011-10-14  2:01             ` Bojan Smojver
2011-10-14  6:14               ` Pekka Enberg
2011-10-14  6:50                 ` Bojan Smojver
2011-10-15  6:28                 ` Bojan Smojver

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2409186928.1003010428@rexursive.com \
    --to=bojan@rexursive.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome