mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
To: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Cc: "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Jan Kara" <jack@suse.cz>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	"Ira Weiny" <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
	"Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
	"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
	"Al Viro" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@infradead.org>,
	"Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"Dave Chinner" <david@fromorbit.com>,
	"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
	"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@suse.com>,
	"Mike Kravetz" <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
	"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>,
	"Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	lkp@lists.01.org, lkp@intel.com, ying.huang@intel.com,
	feng.tang@intel.com, zhengjun.xing@intel.com,
	guobing.chen@intel.com, ming.a.chen@intel.com,
	frank.du@intel.com, Shuhua.Fan@intel.com, wangyang.guo@intel.com,
	Wenhuan.Huang@intel.com, jessica.ji@intel.com,
	shan.kang@intel.com, guangli.li@intel.com, tiejun.li@intel.com,
	yu.ma@intel.com, dapeng1.mi@intel.com, jiebin.sun@intel.com,
	gengxin.xie@intel.com, fan.zhao@intel.com
Subject: Re: [mm/gup] 47e29d32af: phoronix-test-suite.npb.FT.A.total_mop_s -45.0% regression
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 19:35:31 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <24d9d093-5b7a-9aee-8d61-59c0007a9269@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201117024825.GA8169@xsang-OptiPlex-9020>


On 11/16/20 6:48 PM, kernel test robot wrote:
> 
> Greeting,
> 
> FYI, we noticed a -45.0% regression of phoronix-test-suite.npb.FT.A.total_mop_s due to commit:
> 

That's a huge slowdown...

> 
> commit: 47e29d32afba11b13efb51f03154a8cf22fb4360 ("mm/gup: page->hpage_pinned_refcount: exact pin counts for huge pages")
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master

...but that commit happened in April, 2020. Surely if this were a serious issue we
would have some other indication...is this worth following up on?? I'm inclined to
ignore it, honestly.

thanks,
-- 
John Hubbard
NVIDIA
> 
> 
> in testcase: phoronix-test-suite
> on test machine: 96 threads Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6252 CPU @ 2.10GHz with 192G memory
> with following parameters:
> 
> 	test: npb-1.3.1
> 	option_a: FT.A
> 	cpufreq_governor: performance
> 	ucode: 0x5002f01
> 
> test-description: The Phoronix Test Suite is the most comprehensive testing and benchmarking platform available that provides an extensible framework for which new tests can be easily added.
> test-url: http://www.phoronix-test-suite.com/
> 
> 
> 
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
> 
> 
> Details are as below:
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
> 
> 
> To reproduce:
> 
>          git clone https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests.git
>          cd lkp-tests
>          bin/lkp install job.yaml  # job file is attached in this email
>          bin/lkp run     job.yaml
> 
> =========================================================================================
> compiler/cpufreq_governor/kconfig/option_a/rootfs/tbox_group/test/testcase/ucode:
>    gcc-9/performance/x86_64-rhel-8.3/FT.A/debian-x86_64-phoronix/lkp-csl-2sp8/npb-1.3.1/phoronix-test-suite/0x5002f01
> 
> commit:
>    3faa52c03f ("mm/gup: track FOLL_PIN pages")
>    47e29d32af ("mm/gup: page->hpage_pinned_refcount: exact pin counts for huge pages")
> 
> 3faa52c03f440d1b 47e29d32afba11b13efb51f0315
> ---------------- ---------------------------
>         fail:runs  %reproduction    fail:runs
>             |             |             |
>            1:4          -25%            :4     kmsg.Spurious_LAPIC_timer_interrupt_on_cpu
>           %stddev     %change         %stddev
>               \          |                \
>        4585 ±  2%     -45.0%       2522        phoronix-test-suite.npb.FT.A.total_mop_s
>        1223 ±  4%     +40.2%       1714        phoronix-test-suite.time.percent_of_cpu_this_job_got
> 
> 
>                                                                                  
>                       phoronix-test-suite.npb.FT.A.total_mop_s
>                                                                                  
>    6500 +--------------------------------------------------------------------+
>         |  .+.                      .+.      .+.                             |
>    6000 |.+   +.+.+.++.+.+.+.+.+.+.+   +.+.++   +.+.+.+.+.+.+.+.+.++.+       |
>    5500 |-+                                                           :      |
>         |                                                             :      |
>    5000 |-+                                                            :     |
>    4500 |-+                                                            +.+.+.|
>         |                                                                    |
>    4000 |-+                                                                  |
>    3500 |-+                                                                  |
>         |                                                                    |
>    3000 |-+                                                                  |
>    2500 |-+                                       O   O O                    |
>         | O O O O O OO O   O O O O O   O   O  O     O                        |
>    2000 +--------------------------------------------------------------------+
>                                                                                  
>                                                                                  
> [*] bisect-good sample
> [O] bisect-bad  sample
> 
> 
> 
> Disclaimer:
> Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided
> for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software
> design or configuration may affect actual performance.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Oliver Sang
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-17  3:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-17  2:48 kernel test robot
2020-11-17  3:35 ` John Hubbard [this message]
2020-11-18 13:49   ` Jan Kara
2020-11-18 18:17     ` Dan Williams
2020-11-18 19:32       ` John Hubbard
2020-11-20  2:42       ` Oliver Sang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=24d9d093-5b7a-9aee-8d61-59c0007a9269@nvidia.com \
    --to=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=Shuhua.Fan@intel.com \
    --cc=Wenhuan.Huang@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dapeng1.mi@intel.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=fan.zhao@intel.com \
    --cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
    --cc=frank.du@intel.com \
    --cc=gengxin.xie@intel.com \
    --cc=guangli.li@intel.com \
    --cc=guobing.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jessica.ji@intel.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
    --cc=jiebin.sun@intel.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=ming.a.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
    --cc=shan.kang@intel.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=tiejun.li@intel.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=wangyang.guo@intel.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=yu.ma@intel.com \
    --cc=zhengjun.xing@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®