* [PATCH 1/2] libbpf: Use probe_name for legacy kprobe
@ 2021-12-25 8:32 Qiang Wang
2021-12-25 8:32 ` [PATCH 2/2] libbpf: Support repeated legacy kprobes on same function Qiang Wang
2021-12-27 11:47 ` [PATCH 1/2] libbpf: Use probe_name for legacy kprobe Hengqi Chen
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Qiang Wang @ 2021-12-25 8:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ast, daniel, andrii, kafai, songliubraving, yhs, john.fastabend, kpsingh
Cc: netdev, bpf, linux-kernel, zhouchengming, songmuchun,
duanxiongchun, shekairui
Fix a bug in commit 46ed5fc33db9, which wrongly used the
func_name instead of probe_name to register legacy kprobe.
Fixes: 46ed5fc33db9 ("libbpf: Refactor and simplify legacy kprobe code")
Co-developed-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Qiang Wang <wangqiang.wq.frank@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
---
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
index 7c74342bb668..b7d6c951fa09 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
@@ -9735,7 +9735,7 @@ bpf_program__attach_kprobe_opts(const struct bpf_program *prog,
gen_kprobe_legacy_event_name(probe_name, sizeof(probe_name),
func_name, offset);
- legacy_probe = strdup(func_name);
+ legacy_probe = strdup(probe_name);
if (!legacy_probe)
return libbpf_err_ptr(-ENOMEM);
--
2.20.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* [PATCH 2/2] libbpf: Support repeated legacy kprobes on same function 2021-12-25 8:32 [PATCH 1/2] libbpf: Use probe_name for legacy kprobe Qiang Wang @ 2021-12-25 8:32 ` Qiang Wang 2021-12-27 11:39 ` Hengqi Chen 2021-12-27 11:47 ` [PATCH 1/2] libbpf: Use probe_name for legacy kprobe Hengqi Chen 1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Qiang Wang @ 2021-12-25 8:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ast, daniel, andrii, kafai, songliubraving, yhs, john.fastabend, kpsingh Cc: netdev, bpf, linux-kernel, zhouchengming, songmuchun, duanxiongchun, shekairui If repeated legacy kprobes on same function in one process, libbpf will register using the same probe name and got -EBUSY error. So append index to the probe name format to fix this problem. Co-developed-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Signed-off-by: Qiang Wang <wangqiang.wq.frank@bytedance.com> Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> --- tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c index b7d6c951fa09..0c41a45ffd54 100644 --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c @@ -9634,7 +9634,9 @@ static int append_to_file(const char *file, const char *fmt, ...) static void gen_kprobe_legacy_event_name(char *buf, size_t buf_sz, const char *kfunc_name, size_t offset) { - snprintf(buf, buf_sz, "libbpf_%u_%s_0x%zx", getpid(), kfunc_name, offset); + static int index = 0; + snprintf(buf, buf_sz, "libbpf_%u_%s_0x%zx_%d", getpid(), kfunc_name, offset + __sync_fetch_and_add(&index, 1)); } static int add_kprobe_event_legacy(const char *probe_name, bool retprobe, -- 2.20.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] libbpf: Support repeated legacy kprobes on same function 2021-12-25 8:32 ` [PATCH 2/2] libbpf: Support repeated legacy kprobes on same function Qiang Wang @ 2021-12-27 11:39 ` Hengqi Chen 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Hengqi Chen @ 2021-12-27 11:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Qiang Wang, ast, daniel, andrii, kafai, songliubraving, yhs, john.fastabend, kpsingh Cc: netdev, bpf, linux-kernel, zhouchengming, songmuchun, duanxiongchun, shekairui On 2021/12/25 4:32 PM, Qiang Wang wrote: > If repeated legacy kprobes on same function in one process, > libbpf will register using the same probe name and got -EBUSY > error. So append index to the probe name format to fix this > problem. > > Co-developed-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> > Signed-off-by: Qiang Wang <wangqiang.wq.frank@bytedance.com> > Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> > --- > tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c > index b7d6c951fa09..0c41a45ffd54 100644 > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c > @@ -9634,7 +9634,9 @@ static int append_to_file(const char *file, const char *fmt, ...) > static void gen_kprobe_legacy_event_name(char *buf, size_t buf_sz, > const char *kfunc_name, size_t offset) > { > - snprintf(buf, buf_sz, "libbpf_%u_%s_0x%zx", getpid(), kfunc_name, offset); > + static int index = 0; Add empty line after variable declaration. > + snprintf(buf, buf_sz, "libbpf_%u_%s_0x%zx_%d", getpid(), kfunc_name, offset Missing a comma after offset. > + __sync_fetch_and_add(&index, 1)); > } > > static int add_kprobe_event_legacy(const char *probe_name, bool retprobe, ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] libbpf: Use probe_name for legacy kprobe 2021-12-25 8:32 [PATCH 1/2] libbpf: Use probe_name for legacy kprobe Qiang Wang 2021-12-25 8:32 ` [PATCH 2/2] libbpf: Support repeated legacy kprobes on same function Qiang Wang @ 2021-12-27 11:47 ` Hengqi Chen 1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Hengqi Chen @ 2021-12-27 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Qiang Wang, ast, daniel, andrii, kafai, songliubraving, yhs, john.fastabend, kpsingh Cc: netdev, bpf, linux-kernel, zhouchengming, songmuchun, duanxiongchun, shekairui On 2021/12/25 4:32 PM, Qiang Wang wrote: > Fix a bug in commit 46ed5fc33db9, which wrongly used the > func_name instead of probe_name to register legacy kprobe. > > Fixes: 46ed5fc33db9 ("libbpf: Refactor and simplify legacy kprobe code") > Co-developed-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> > Signed-off-by: Qiang Wang <wangqiang.wq.frank@bytedance.com> > Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> > --- > tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c > index 7c74342bb668..b7d6c951fa09 100644 > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c > @@ -9735,7 +9735,7 @@ bpf_program__attach_kprobe_opts(const struct bpf_program *prog, > gen_kprobe_legacy_event_name(probe_name, sizeof(probe_name), > func_name, offset); > > - legacy_probe = strdup(func_name); > + legacy_probe = strdup(probe_name); > if (!legacy_probe) > return libbpf_err_ptr(-ENOMEM); > Reviewed-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com> Tested-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-12-27 11:47 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2021-12-25 8:32 [PATCH 1/2] libbpf: Use probe_name for legacy kprobe Qiang Wang 2021-12-25 8:32 ` [PATCH 2/2] libbpf: Support repeated legacy kprobes on same function Qiang Wang 2021-12-27 11:39 ` Hengqi Chen 2021-12-27 11:47 ` [PATCH 1/2] libbpf: Use probe_name for legacy kprobe Hengqi Chen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®