mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com>
To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	Hans Verkuil <hverkuil+cisco@kernel.org>,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
	Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>,
	Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@kernel.org>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: videobuf2: forbid create_bufs/remove_bufs when legacy fileio is active
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 10:30:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <258b9036-697d-48b2-91d6-5fb8ea2f1350@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <642c2102-8d0f-4883-ab02-dd1da66a7a94@samsung.com>


Le 20/10/2025 à 10:21, Marek Szyprowski a écrit :
> On 20.10.2025 09:48, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
>> Le 20/10/2025 à 09:39, Hans Verkuil a écrit :
>>> On 20/10/2025 09:34, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>>>> On 20.10.2025 09:11, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
>>>>> Le 16/10/2025 à 13:11, Marek Szyprowski a écrit :
>>>>>> create_bufs and remove_bufs ioctl calls manipulate queue internal
>>>>>> buffer
>>>>>> list, potentially overwriting some pointers used by the legacy fileio
>>>>>> access mode. Simply forbid those calls when fileio is active to
>>>>>> protect
>>>>>> internal queue state between subsequent read/write calls.
>>>>> Hi Marek,
>>>>>
>>>>> I may be wrong but using fileio API and create/remove API at the same
>>>>> time
>>>>> sound incorrect from application point of view, right ? If that not
>>>>> the
>>>>> case maybe we should also add a test in v4l2-compliance.
>>>> Definitely that's incorrect and v4l2-core must forbid such calls. The
>>>> standard reqbufs/qbuf/dqbuf API is also forbidden. Extending
>>>> v4l2-compliance tools is probably a good idea.
>>> Yes, please! A patch is welcome.
>>>
>>>    I also wonder if its a
>>>> good time to add a kernel option to completely disable legacy fileio
>>>> access mode, as it is not really needed for most of the systems
>>>> nowadays.
>>> No, that will break applications. Using read() is very common (and
>>> convenient!)
>>> for MPEG encoders such as the cx18 driver.
>>>
>>> The fileio code is not blocking any new development, it's just there
>>> for those
>>> drivers were it makes sense.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>>      Hans
>> I wonder if this patch in useful because when calling
>> vb2_ioctl_create_bufs()
>> it already check in vb2_verify_memory_type() if fileio is used or not.
> Frankly speaking the original report I got was about mixing fileio with
> vb2_ioctl_remove_bufs and that case is indeed not protected.
>
> While analyzing that I've inspected a symmetrical ioctl
> (vb2_ioctl_create_bufs), but it looks I've I missed that a check is in
> vb2_verify_memory_type(). I will remove it in v2 then.

To keep vb2_ioctl_remove_bufs() symmetrical to vb2_ioctl_create_bufs()
we should do in vb2_ioctl_remove_bufs() something like :
res = vb2_verify_memory_type(vdev->queue, vdev->queue->memory, d->type);
instead of vdev->queue->type != d->type.

This way we test fileio too.


>
> Best regards

  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-20  8:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20251016111208eucas1p24cd8cc1e952a8cdf73fbadea704b499d@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2025-10-16 11:11 ` Marek Szyprowski
2025-10-20  7:11   ` Benjamin Gaignard
2025-10-20  7:34     ` Marek Szyprowski
2025-10-20  7:39       ` Hans Verkuil
2025-10-20  7:48         ` Benjamin Gaignard
2025-10-20  8:21           ` Marek Szyprowski
2025-10-20  8:30             ` Benjamin Gaignard [this message]
2025-10-20 16:05               ` Marek Szyprowski
2025-10-20  7:36   ` Marek Szyprowski
2025-10-18 18:34 Bai, Shuangpeng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=258b9036-697d-48b2-91d6-5fb8ea2f1350@collabora.com \
    --to=benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com \
    --cc=g.liakhovetski@gmx.de \
    --cc=hverkuil+cisco@kernel.org \
    --cc=hverkuil@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tfiga@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®