From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
To: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@kernel.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: videobuf2: forbid create_bufs/remove_bufs when legacy fileio is active
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 09:34:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <84133573-986d-4cc8-8147-246f0da34640@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <36cfec0a-3717-4b0e-adc0-6887e6b58f44@collabora.com>
On 20.10.2025 09:11, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
>
> Le 16/10/2025 à 13:11, Marek Szyprowski a écrit :
>> create_bufs and remove_bufs ioctl calls manipulate queue internal buffer
>> list, potentially overwriting some pointers used by the legacy fileio
>> access mode. Simply forbid those calls when fileio is active to protect
>> internal queue state between subsequent read/write calls.
>
> Hi Marek,
>
> I may be wrong but using fileio API and create/remove API at the same
> time
> sound incorrect from application point of view, right ? If that not the
> case maybe we should also add a test in v4l2-compliance.
Definitely that's incorrect and v4l2-core must forbid such calls. The
standard reqbufs/qbuf/dqbuf API is also forbidden. Extending
v4l2-compliance tools is probably a good idea. I also wonder if its a
good time to add a kernel option to completely disable legacy fileio
access mode, as it is not really needed for most of the systems nowadays.
> ...
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-20 7:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20251016111208eucas1p24cd8cc1e952a8cdf73fbadea704b499d@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2025-10-16 11:11 ` Marek Szyprowski
2025-10-20 7:11 ` Benjamin Gaignard
2025-10-20 7:34 ` Marek Szyprowski [this message]
2025-10-20 7:39 ` Hans Verkuil
2025-10-20 7:48 ` Benjamin Gaignard
2025-10-20 8:21 ` Marek Szyprowski
2025-10-20 8:30 ` Benjamin Gaignard
2025-10-20 16:05 ` Marek Szyprowski
2025-10-20 7:36 ` Marek Szyprowski
2025-10-18 18:34 Bai, Shuangpeng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=84133573-986d-4cc8-8147-246f0da34640@samsung.com \
--to=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com \
--cc=g.liakhovetski@gmx.de \
--cc=hverkuil@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tfiga@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®