Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: clean up the Kconfig file

[Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>]

Hi Bart--

On 10/24/21 6:17 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 10/24/21 16:35, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 10/24/21 2:29 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>>> On 10/23/21 23:43, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>>>         sure that you know the name of your UFS host adapter (the card
>>>>         inside your computer that "speaks" the UFS protocol, also
>>>>         called UFS Host Controller), because you will be asked for it.
>>>> @@ -51,7 +50,7 @@ config SCSI_UFSHCD
>>>>         (the one containing the directory /) is located on a UFS device.
>>>>   config SCSI_UFSHCD_PCI
>>>> -    tristate "PCI bus based UFS Controller support"
>>>> +    tristate "PCI bus-based UFS Controller support"
>>>
>>> Even with this change applied capitalization is inconsistent.
>>
>> I don't doubt it, but could you be more explicit about
>> which word(s) you mean, please?
>>
>> I see one "pci" in the Kconfig file.

I changed that one. ^^^

>> I see several "Controller" vs. "controller."
>> I see a few of "Support" vs. "support."
>>
>> Which are you referring to? (or something else)
> 
> I was referring to the word "Controller". Although English is not my native
> language, shouldn't "UFS Controller" be changed into "UFS controller" since
> neither "bus-based" nor "support" are capitalized?

That's not so clear to me, but then I don't have access to the UFS specs.

This help text:
	  UFS host adapter (the card
	  inside your computer that "speaks" the UFS protocol, also
	  called UFS Host Controller)

might imply that the spec calls it "UFS Host Controller", but I can't
read it (AFAIK). OTOH, if that's just a common (non-spec) name for it,
then yes, it should be in lower case ("controller").

I'm leaning towards using "controller" everywhere -- or not changing
any of them. :)
Oh well.

Do you have any insights into this?

thanks.
-- 
~Randy