mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au>
To: Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] binfmt_misc.c, kernel-2.4.12
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 22:37:13 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <26403.1003754233@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 22 Oct 2001 08:15:45 -0400." <Pine.GSO.4.21.0110220811210.2294-100000@weyl.math.psu.edu>

On Mon, 22 Oct 2001 08:15:45 -0400 (EDT), 
Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu> wrote:
>On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, Keith Owens wrote:
>
>> Please, no more 2.4 changes.  Let Linus get 2.4 stable, fork 2.5 so we
>> can break it on a daily basis then backport to 2.4 when it works.
>
>and
>
>> -ac kernels?  And have that behaviour depending on which version of
>> modutils the user installed?  Not in 2.4, modutils strives for
>> stability in production kernels, it is an important interface between
>> the kernel and user space.
> 
>Correct me if I'm wrong, but two quotes above seem to contradict each other
>- AFAICS arguments in the latter apply to backporting...

I left out a phrase.  "backport to 2.4 when it works and does not
affect 2.4 compatibility".  That is a given on modutils, I won't
consider anything that breaks modutils compatibility on any kernel from
2.4 right down to 2.0.  modutils 2.5 can shatter into tiny pieces, not
a problem.


  reply	other threads:[~2001-10-22 12:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-10-19 11:54 Albert Bartoszko
2001-10-19 12:54 ` Alexander Viro
2001-10-19 13:32   ` Richard Guenther
2001-10-19 18:48     ` Alexander Viro
2001-10-19 21:35       ` Richard Guenther
2001-10-19 22:00         ` Alexander Viro
2001-10-22  6:00   ` Albert Bartoszko
2001-10-22  6:47     ` Alexander Viro
2001-10-22  7:42       ` Keith Owens
2001-10-22  8:05         ` Alexander Viro
2001-10-22  8:21           ` Keith Owens
2001-10-22  8:33             ` Alexander Viro
2001-10-22  9:19               ` Keith Owens
2001-10-22  9:34                 ` Alexander Viro
2001-10-22  9:55                   ` Alexander Viro
2001-10-22 11:17                   ` Keith Owens
2001-10-22 11:33                     ` Alexander Viro
2001-10-22 11:52                       ` Keith Owens
2001-10-22 12:15                         ` Alexander Viro
2001-10-22 12:37                           ` Keith Owens [this message]
2001-10-22 15:56                 ` bill davidsen
2001-10-22 15:47             ` bill davidsen
2001-10-22 17:24       ` Andrew Morton
2001-10-22 17:50         ` Alexander Viro
2001-10-23  9:28       ` Albert Bartoszko
2001-10-21 15:26 ` Alan Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=26403.1003754233@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au \
    --to=kaos@ocs.com.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@math.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®