* [PATCH tip] selftests/rseq: Revert "selftests/rseq: Add mm_numa_cid to test script"
@ 2023-01-04 16:35 Mathieu Desnoyers
2023-01-11 14:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mathieu Desnoyers @ 2023-01-04 16:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Zijlstra
Cc: linux-kernel, Thomas Gleixner, Paul E . McKenney, Boqun Feng,
H . Peter Anvin, Paul Turner, linux-api, Christian Brauner,
Florian Weimer, David.Laight, carlos, Peter Oskolkov,
Alexander Mikhalitsyn, Chris Kennelly, Mathieu Desnoyers,
kernel test robot
The mm_numa_cid related rseq patches from the series were not picked up
into the tip tree, so enabling the mm_numa_cid test needs to be
reverted.
This reverts commit b344b8f2d88dbf095caf97ac57fd3645843fa70f.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202301040903.2dd1e25b-oliver.sang@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/rseq/run_param_test.sh | 5 -----
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/run_param_test.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/run_param_test.sh
index 603b3b69d20c..8d31426ab41f 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/run_param_test.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/run_param_test.sh
@@ -47,11 +47,6 @@ function do_tests()
./param_test_mm_cid ${TEST_LIST[$i]} -r ${REPS} -t ${NR_THREADS} ${@} ${EXTRA_ARGS} || exit 1
echo "Running mm_cid compare-twice test ${TEST_NAME[$i]}"
./param_test_mm_cid_compare_twice ${TEST_LIST[$i]} -r ${REPS} -t ${NR_THREADS} ${@} ${EXTRA_ARGS} || exit 1
-
- echo "Running mm_numa_cid test ${TEST_NAME[$i]}"
- ./param_test_mm_numa_cid ${TEST_LIST[$i]} -r ${REPS} -t ${NR_THREADS} ${@} ${EXTRA_ARGS} || exit 1
- echo "Running mm_numa_cid compare-twice test ${TEST_NAME[$i]}"
- ./param_test_mm_numa_cid_compare_twice ${TEST_LIST[$i]} -r ${REPS} -t ${NR_THREADS} ${@} ${EXTRA_ARGS} || exit 1
let "i++"
done
}
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH tip] selftests/rseq: Revert "selftests/rseq: Add mm_numa_cid to test script"
2023-01-04 16:35 [PATCH tip] selftests/rseq: Revert "selftests/rseq: Add mm_numa_cid to test script" Mathieu Desnoyers
@ 2023-01-11 14:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-01-11 14:14 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2023-01-11 14:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mathieu Desnoyers
Cc: linux-kernel, Thomas Gleixner, Paul E . McKenney, Boqun Feng,
H . Peter Anvin, Paul Turner, linux-api, Christian Brauner,
Florian Weimer, David.Laight, carlos, Peter Oskolkov,
Alexander Mikhalitsyn, Chris Kennelly, kernel test robot
On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 11:35:42AM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> The mm_numa_cid related rseq patches from the series were not picked up
> into the tip tree, so enabling the mm_numa_cid test needs to be
> reverted.
>
> This reverts commit b344b8f2d88dbf095caf97ac57fd3645843fa70f.
Oh my bad, I got confused between the regular numa_id (which I did do
merge, right?) and the fancy numa_cid, which I indeed didn't merge yet.
I meant to give that a wee bit more thought, but that sadly hasn't
happened yet :/
Applied, thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH tip] selftests/rseq: Revert "selftests/rseq: Add mm_numa_cid to test script"
2023-01-11 14:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
@ 2023-01-11 14:14 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mathieu Desnoyers @ 2023-01-11 14:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Zijlstra
Cc: linux-kernel, Thomas Gleixner, Paul E . McKenney, Boqun Feng,
H . Peter Anvin, Paul Turner, linux-api, Christian Brauner,
Florian Weimer, David.Laight, carlos, Peter Oskolkov,
Alexander Mikhalitsyn, Chris Kennelly, kernel test robot
On 2023-01-11 09:12, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 11:35:42AM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> The mm_numa_cid related rseq patches from the series were not picked up
>> into the tip tree, so enabling the mm_numa_cid test needs to be
>> reverted.
>>
>> This reverts commit b344b8f2d88dbf095caf97ac57fd3645843fa70f.
>
> Oh my bad, I got confused between the regular numa_id (which I did do
> merge, right?) and the fancy numa_cid, which I indeed didn't merge yet.
Yes, that's indeed what happened.
> I meant to give that a wee bit more thought, but that sadly hasn't
> happened yet :/
>
> Applied, thanks!
No worries, let me know when you have time to discuss the fancy numa_cid
some more.
Thanks,
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
https://www.efficios.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-01-11 14:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-01-04 16:35 [PATCH tip] selftests/rseq: Revert "selftests/rseq: Add mm_numa_cid to test script" Mathieu Desnoyers
2023-01-11 14:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-01-11 14:14 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®