From: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
To: "Gabriel C" <nix.or.die@gmail.com>, "Michel Dänzer" <michel@daenzer.net>
Cc: Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin@mozilla.com>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, alexander.deucher@amd.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Kernel and ADM hardware roulette ( was AMD graphics performance regression in 4.15 and later )
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2018 09:07:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <267c42ce-91e2-4843-3815-904ac74b2f44@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEJqkgjErpxG44CZXn2BzvPES7Ptf24ae6748dAcYdg2n5HuZw@mail.gmail.com>
Am 06.06.2018 um 17:44 schrieb Gabriel C:
> 2018-06-06 17:03 GMT+02:00 Michel Dänzer <michel@daenzer.net>:
>> On 2018-06-06 04:44 PM, Christian König wrote:
>>> Am 06.06.2018 um 16:12 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
>>> [SNIP]
>>> At least in theory it should work when we use the coherent DMA allocator.
>>>
>>> When that really worked before, so the most likely commit which broke
>>> this is:
>>>
>>> commit fd5fd480dd8fe4910546e7b080b3ae345e57fe9f
>>> Author: Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>
>>> Date: Fri Feb 9 10:44:09 2018 +0800
>>>
>>> drm/amdgpu: only enable swiotlb alloc when need v2
>>>
>>> get the max io mapping address of system memory to see if it is over
>>> our card accessing range.
>>> v2: move checking later
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Monk Liu <monk.liu@amd.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
>>>
>>> Currently looking into how we could somehow improve this detection.
>> I guess this could fit for Gabriel, but e.g.
>> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/104437 says amdgpu was already broken with
>> SME in 4.15, if not 4.14 (I suspect there was simply no SME support
>> earlier).
And what I totally missed is that Gabriel is using radeon and not amdgpu.
So Gabriel you need to revert this one for testing:
commit 1bc3d3cce8c3b44c2b5ac6cee98c830bb40e6b0f
Author: Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>
Date: Fri Feb 9 10:44:10 2018 +0800
drm/radeon: only enable swiotlb path when need v2
swiotlb expands our card accessing range, but its path always is slower
than ttm pool allocation.
So add condition to use it.
v2: move a bit later
Signed-off-by: Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Monk Liu <monk.liu@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Link:
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180209024410.1469-3-david1.zhou@amd.com
> I got strange performance issue with 4.15 and 4.16 .. but SME was ON
> on that setup ( even before it hit mainline ) and never broke the GPU like this.
Well that is very interesting, you are the first one who reports that
SME + GFX works in some way. So far we only got negative reports for that.
> There is a 4.16.13 boot dmesg which has no such issue:
>
> http://ftp.frugalware.org/pub/other/people/crazy/radeon/dmesg-radeon-SME-ON-kernel-4.16.txt
>
> With the setup as is booting 4.16.x works , while 4.17 trows the errors.
Please do the bisect if the patch I've mentioned above doesn't help.
Thanks,
Christian.
>
>>
>> --
>> Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com
>> Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-07 7:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-06 13:33 Gabriel C
2018-06-06 14:12 ` Michel Dänzer
2018-06-06 14:44 ` Christian König
2018-06-06 15:03 ` Michel Dänzer
2018-06-06 15:44 ` Gabriel C
2018-06-07 7:07 ` Christian König [this message]
2018-06-07 12:32 ` Gabriel C
2018-06-07 16:24 ` Gabriel C
2018-06-07 17:20 ` Christian König
2018-06-08 6:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-08 6:47 ` Christian König
2018-06-08 6:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-08 6:52 ` Christian König
2018-06-08 13:32 ` Gabriel C
2018-06-11 7:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-11 19:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-06-06 15:24 ` Gabriel C
2018-06-06 14:29 ` Christian König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=267c42ce-91e2-4843-3815-904ac74b2f44@amd.com \
--to=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=Felix.Kuehling@amd.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jmvalin@mozilla.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michel@daenzer.net \
--cc=nix.or.die@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®