From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] clocksource: Warn if too many missing ticks are detected
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 11:35:14 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <267d64f5-ed31-f158-ee80-068b2be0fb74@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1809190948470.1468@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
On 09/19/2018 03:53 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018, Waiman Long wrote:
>
>> The clocksource watchdog, when running, is scheduled on all the CPUs in
>> the system sequentially on a round-robin fashion with a period of 0.5s.
>> A bug in the 4.18 kernel is causing missing ticks when nohz_full
>> is specified. Under some circumstances, this causes the watchdog to
>> incorrectly state that the TSC is unstable because of counter overflow
>> in the hpet watchdog clock source after a few minutes delay.
>>
>> That particular bug is fixed by the 4.19 commit 7059b36636beab ("sched:
>> idle: Avoid retaining the tick when it has been stopped"). To make it
>> easier to catch this kind of bug in the future, a check is added to see
>> if there is too much delay in the invocation of the watchdog callback
>> and print a warning once if it happens.
> Second thoughts on this. Putting the check into the clocksource watchdog is
> the wrong place as it's just checking at a place where the symptom
> shows. What about putting it right to the source, i.e. in the timer wheel
> as it does not depend on the clocksource watchdog being active. The
> clocksource watchdog triggering is just one of the symptoms, but in general
> timers being massively late is not a good thing.
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
>
It looks like there are more complications to deal with in order to do
the proper check. I will leave the check in the watchdog for the time
being and see how thing works out.
-Longman
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-24 15:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-19 1:19 Waiman Long
2018-09-19 7:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-19 9:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-09-19 16:32 ` Waiman Long
2018-09-24 15:35 ` Waiman Long [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=267d64f5-ed31-f158-ee80-068b2be0fb74@redhat.com \
--to=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®