* [PATCH] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Correct the typo 'ACCCESS_LOCAL'
@ 2024-09-20 3:16 WangYuli
2024-09-20 10:34 ` Ilpo Järvinen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: WangYuli @ 2024-09-20 3:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: david.e.box, hdegoede, ilpo.jarvinen
Cc: platform-driver-x86, linux-kernel, tzimmermann, lee.jones, lee,
guanwentao, zhanjun, WangYuli
There is a spelling mistake of 'ACCCESS_LOCAL' which should be
instead of 'ACCESS_LOCAL'.
Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: WangYuli <wangyuli@uniontech.com>
---
drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c
index c04bb7f97a4d..7680474c4f96 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c
@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ static int intel_pmt_populate_entry(struct intel_pmt_entry *entry,
/*
* Some hardware use a different calculation for the base address
* when access_type == ACCESS_LOCAL. On the these systems
- * ACCCESS_LOCAL refers to an address in the same BAR as the
+ * ACCESS_LOCAL refers to an address in the same BAR as the
* header but at a fixed offset. But as the header address was
* supplied to the driver, we don't know which BAR it was in.
* So search for the bar whose range includes the header address.
--
2.45.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Correct the typo 'ACCCESS_LOCAL'
2024-09-20 3:16 [PATCH] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Correct the typo 'ACCCESS_LOCAL' WangYuli
@ 2024-09-20 10:34 ` Ilpo Järvinen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ilpo Järvinen @ 2024-09-20 10:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: WangYuli
Cc: david.e.box, Hans de Goede, platform-driver-x86, LKML,
tzimmermann, lee.jones, lee, guanwentao, zhanjun
On Fri, 20 Sep 2024, WangYuli wrote:
> There is a spelling mistake of 'ACCCESS_LOCAL' which should be
> instead of 'ACCESS_LOCAL'.
"instead of ACCESS_LOCAL" means opposite of what you intended. I'd just
drop "instead of".
> Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
> Signed-off-by: WangYuli <wangyuli@uniontech.com>
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c
> index c04bb7f97a4d..7680474c4f96 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c
> @@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ static int intel_pmt_populate_entry(struct intel_pmt_entry *entry,
> /*
> * Some hardware use a different calculation for the base address
> * when access_type == ACCESS_LOCAL. On the these systems
> - * ACCCESS_LOCAL refers to an address in the same BAR as the
> + * ACCESS_LOCAL refers to an address in the same BAR as the
The change is fine.
--
i.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-09-20 10:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-09-20 3:16 [PATCH] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Correct the typo 'ACCCESS_LOCAL' WangYuli
2024-09-20 10:34 ` Ilpo Järvinen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome