[PATCH -next] Makefile: add implicit enum-conversion check for compile build

[PATCH -next] Makefile: add implicit enum-conversion check for compile build

[Zeng Heng]

Provide implicit enum-conversion warning option
in general build. When it set enabled, it can
detect implicit enum type conversion and find
potential conversion errors like below
(use "allmodconfig"):

drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/dcn20/display_mode_vba_20.c:3904:46:
error: implicit conversion from ‘enum <anonymous>’ to ‘enum odm_combine_mode’ [-Werror=enum-conversion]
 3904 |       locals->ODMCombineEnablePerState[i][k] = true;
      |                                              ^

The '-Wenum-conversion' could be regarded as
effective check on compile runtime and
call attention on potential mistakes.

Anothor practical example could be referred to:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/CADnq5_OE0yZvEYGu82QJHL9wvVcTFZrmeTgX7URgh7FVA=jqYg@mail.gmail.com

"-Wenum-conversion" was firstly introduced from
GNU gcc-10.

Although "-Wenum-conversion" could be enabled
by "-Wextra" when compiling with 'W=1' option,
there are many warnings generated by '-Wextra'
that cause too much noise in a build.

Seeing the details from the following link:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-11.3.0/gcc/Warning-Options.html

Because there are still some concerned warnings
exist, the patch marks the option disabled in default
for avoiding compile failed like using "allmodconfig".

Signed-off-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com>
---
 Makefile          | 5 +++++
 lib/Kconfig.debug | 7 +++++++
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index ebd48fc956a3..1790a3624358 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -880,6 +880,11 @@ endif
 KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-disable-warning, unused-but-set-variable)
 KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-disable-warning, unused-const-variable)
 
+# check implicit enum conversion
+ifdef CONFIG_ENUM_CONVERSION
+KBUILD_CFLAGS += -Wenum-conversion
+endif
+
 # These result in bogus false positives
 KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-disable-warning, dangling-pointer)
 
diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
index 4f2b81229a2f..a64e06a747d8 100644
--- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
@@ -417,6 +417,13 @@ config FRAME_WARN
 	  Setting this too low will cause a lot of warnings.
 	  Setting it to 0 disables the warning.
 
+config ENUM_CONVERSION
+	bool "Warn for implicit enum conversion"
+	depends on GCC_VERSION >= 100300
+	default n
+	help
+	  Tell gcc to warn at build time for implicit enum conversion.
+
 config STRIP_ASM_SYMS
 	bool "Strip assembler-generated symbols during link"
 	default n
-- 
2.25.1

Re: [PATCH -next] Makefile: add implicit enum-conversion check for compile build

[Nick Desaulniers]

On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 8:15 AM Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> Provide implicit enum-conversion warning option
> in general build. When it set enabled, it can
> detect implicit enum type conversion and find
> potential conversion errors like below
> (use "allmodconfig"):
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/dcn20/display_mode_vba_20.c:3904:46:
> error: implicit conversion from ‘enum <anonymous>’ to ‘enum odm_combine_mode’ [-Werror=enum-conversion]
>  3904 |       locals->ODMCombineEnablePerState[i][k] = true;
>       |                                              ^
>
> The '-Wenum-conversion' could be regarded as
> effective check on compile runtime and
> call attention on potential mistakes.
>
> Anothor practical example could be referred to:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/CADnq5_OE0yZvEYGu82QJHL9wvVcTFZrmeTgX7URgh7FVA=jqYg@mail.gmail.com
>
> "-Wenum-conversion" was firstly introduced from
> GNU gcc-10.

What about clang? ;)

>
> Although "-Wenum-conversion" could be enabled
> by "-Wextra" when compiling with 'W=1' option,
> there are many warnings generated by '-Wextra'
> that cause too much noise in a build.

With clang, I believe that -Wenum-conversion is part of -Wall or
-Wextra; so enabling this explicitly is only necessary for GCC.  I
wonder why it's not part of -Wall or -Wextra for GCC?  Perhaps worth a
bug report/feature request?

>
> Seeing the details from the following link:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-11.3.0/gcc/Warning-Options.html
>
> Because there are still some concerned warnings
> exist, the patch marks the option disabled in default
> for avoiding compile failed like using "allmodconfig".
>
> Signed-off-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com>
> ---
>  Makefile          | 5 +++++
>  lib/Kconfig.debug | 7 +++++++
>  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> index ebd48fc956a3..1790a3624358 100644
> --- a/Makefile
> +++ b/Makefile
> @@ -880,6 +880,11 @@ endif
>  KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-disable-warning, unused-but-set-variable)
>  KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-disable-warning, unused-const-variable)
>
> +# check implicit enum conversion
> +ifdef CONFIG_ENUM_CONVERSION
> +KBUILD_CFLAGS += -Wenum-conversion
> +endif

Having a kconfig for this is overkill.  cc-option with a comment about
the compiler default versions is the way to go.

> +
>  # These result in bogus false positives
>  KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-disable-warning, dangling-pointer)
>
> diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> index 4f2b81229a2f..a64e06a747d8 100644
> --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
> +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> @@ -417,6 +417,13 @@ config FRAME_WARN
>           Setting this too low will cause a lot of warnings.
>           Setting it to 0 disables the warning.
>
> +config ENUM_CONVERSION
> +       bool "Warn for implicit enum conversion"
> +       depends on GCC_VERSION >= 100300
> +       default n
> +       help
> +         Tell gcc to warn at build time for implicit enum conversion.
> +
>  config STRIP_ASM_SYMS
>         bool "Strip assembler-generated symbols during link"
>         default n
> --
> 2.25.1
>


-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers

Re: [PATCH -next] Makefile: add implicit enum-conversion check for compile build

[Nathan Chancellor]

On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 09:45:17AM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 8:15 AM Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com> wrote:
> >
> > Provide implicit enum-conversion warning option
> > in general build. When it set enabled, it can
> > detect implicit enum type conversion and find
> > potential conversion errors like below
> > (use "allmodconfig"):
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/dcn20/display_mode_vba_20.c:3904:46:
> > error: implicit conversion from ‘enum <anonymous>’ to ‘enum odm_combine_mode’ [-Werror=enum-conversion]
> >  3904 |       locals->ODMCombineEnablePerState[i][k] = true;
> >       |                                              ^
> >
> > The '-Wenum-conversion' could be regarded as
> > effective check on compile runtime and
> > call attention on potential mistakes.
> >
> > Anothor practical example could be referred to:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/CADnq5_OE0yZvEYGu82QJHL9wvVcTFZrmeTgX7URgh7FVA=jqYg@mail.gmail.com
> >
> > "-Wenum-conversion" was firstly introduced from
> > GNU gcc-10.
> 
> What about clang? ;)
> 
> >
> > Although "-Wenum-conversion" could be enabled
> > by "-Wextra" when compiling with 'W=1' option,
> > there are many warnings generated by '-Wextra'
> > that cause too much noise in a build.
> 
> With clang, I believe that -Wenum-conversion is part of -Wall or
> -Wextra; so enabling this explicitly is only necessary for GCC.  I
> wonder why it's not part of -Wall or -Wextra for GCC?  Perhaps worth a
> bug report/feature request?

With clang, -Wenum-conversion is just default enabled, not even behind
-Wall:

$ cat test.c
enum enum1 { A = 1 };
enum enum2 { B = 2 };

enum enum1 foo(enum enum2 bar)
{
    return bar;
}

$ clang -fsyntax-only test.c
test.c:11:9: warning: implicit conversion from enumeration type 'enum enum2' to different enumeration type 'enum enum1' [-Wenum-conversion]
        return bar;
        ~~~~~~ ^~~
1 warning generated.

On the other hand, GCC does have it under -Wextra:

$ gcc -fsyntax-only test.c

$ gcc -Wextra -fsyntax-only test.c
test.c: In function ‘foo’:
test.c:6:16: warning: implicit conversion from ‘enum enum2’ to ‘enum enum1’ [-Wenum-conversion]
    6 |         return bar;
      |                ^~~

But the kernel does not build with -Wextra aside from W=[123], hence
this warning has to be explicitly requested for GCC.

> >
> > Seeing the details from the following link:
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-11.3.0/gcc/Warning-Options.html
> >
> > Because there are still some concerned warnings
> > exist, the patch marks the option disabled in default
> > for avoiding compile failed like using "allmodconfig".

But there is no dependency to avoid this getting enabled by allmodconfig
(such as 'depends on !COMPILE_TEST') so I don't see the point in the
current form; 'default n' does nothing to prevent it. Regardless, I
agree with Nick's sentiment below.

> > Signed-off-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com>
> > ---
> >  Makefile          | 5 +++++
> >  lib/Kconfig.debug | 7 +++++++
> >  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> > index ebd48fc956a3..1790a3624358 100644
> > --- a/Makefile
> > +++ b/Makefile
> > @@ -880,6 +880,11 @@ endif
> >  KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-disable-warning, unused-but-set-variable)
> >  KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-disable-warning, unused-const-variable)
> >
> > +# check implicit enum conversion
> > +ifdef CONFIG_ENUM_CONVERSION
> > +KBUILD_CFLAGS += -Wenum-conversion
> > +endif
> 
> Having a kconfig for this is overkill.  cc-option with a comment about
> the compiler default versions is the way to go.

Agreed. If there is some reason -Wenum-conversion cannot be enabled for
GCC right now (such as existing warnings, which the commit message
appears to alude to), they should be cleaned up first then
-Wenum-conversion should just be unconditionally enabled for all
compilers that support it via cc-option, not half enabled via Kconfig so
that maybe people will clean up the warnings. That is not how enabling
warnings works:

https://lore.kernel.org/CAHk-=wg-mH-_GYpkhz_psjBWG6ZcjKnPo83fg7YMj_by+-LRTQ@mail.gmail.com/

> > +
> >  # These result in bogus false positives
> >  KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-disable-warning, dangling-pointer)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> > index 4f2b81229a2f..a64e06a747d8 100644
> > --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
> > +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> > @@ -417,6 +417,13 @@ config FRAME_WARN
> >           Setting this too low will cause a lot of warnings.
> >           Setting it to 0 disables the warning.
> >
> > +config ENUM_CONVERSION
> > +       bool "Warn for implicit enum conversion"
> > +       depends on GCC_VERSION >= 100300
> > +       default n
> > +       help
> > +         Tell gcc to warn at build time for implicit enum conversion.
> > +
> >  config STRIP_ASM_SYMS
> >         bool "Strip assembler-generated symbols during link"
> >         default n
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
> 
> 
> -- 
> Thanks,
> ~Nick Desaulniers
> 

Re: [PATCH -next] Makefile: add implicit enum-conversion check for compile build

[Zeng Heng]

On 2022/9/28 1:02, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 09:45:17AM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 8:15 AM Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com> wrote:
>>> Provide implicit enum-conversion warning option
>>> in general build. When it set enabled, it can
>>> detect implicit enum type conversion and find
>>> potential conversion errors like below
>>> (use "allmodconfig"):
>>>
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/dcn20/display_mode_vba_20.c:3904:46:
>>> error: implicit conversion from ‘enum <anonymous>’ to ‘enum odm_combine_mode’ [-Werror=enum-conversion]
>>>   3904 |       locals->ODMCombineEnablePerState[i][k] = true;
>>>        |                                              ^
>>>
>>> The '-Wenum-conversion' could be regarded as
>>> effective check on compile runtime and
>>> call attention on potential mistakes.
>>>
>>> Anothor practical example could be referred to:
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/CADnq5_OE0yZvEYGu82QJHL9wvVcTFZrmeTgX7URgh7FVA=jqYg@mail.gmail.com
>>>
>>> "-Wenum-conversion" was firstly introduced from
>>> GNU gcc-10.
>> What about clang? ;)
>>
>>> Although "-Wenum-conversion" could be enabled
>>> by "-Wextra" when compiling with 'W=1' option,
>>> there are many warnings generated by '-Wextra'
>>> that cause too much noise in a build.
>> With clang, I believe that -Wenum-conversion is part of -Wall or
>> -Wextra; so enabling this explicitly is only necessary for GCC.  I
>> wonder why it's not part of -Wall or -Wextra for GCC?  Perhaps worth a
>> bug report/feature request?
> With clang, -Wenum-conversion is just default enabled, not even behind
> -Wall:
>
> $ cat test.c
> enum enum1 { A = 1 };
> enum enum2 { B = 2 };
>
> enum enum1 foo(enum enum2 bar)
> {
>      return bar;
> }
>
> $ clang -fsyntax-only test.c
> test.c:11:9: warning: implicit conversion from enumeration type 'enum enum2' to different enumeration type 'enum enum1' [-Wenum-conversion]
>          return bar;
>          ~~~~~~ ^~~
> 1 warning generated.
>
> On the other hand, GCC does have it under -Wextra:
>
> $ gcc -fsyntax-only test.c
>
> $ gcc -Wextra -fsyntax-only test.c
> test.c: In function ‘foo’:
> test.c:6:16: warning: implicit conversion from ‘enum enum2’ to ‘enum enum1’ [-Wenum-conversion]
>      6 |         return bar;
>        |                ^~~
>
> But the kernel does not build with -Wextra aside from W=[123], hence
> this warning has to be explicitly requested for GCC.

Thanks to your replenish about clang.


>>> Seeing the details from the following link:
>>> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-11.3.0/gcc/Warning-Options.html
>>>
>>> Because there are still some concerned warnings
>>> exist, the patch marks the option disabled in default
>>> for avoiding compile failed like using "allmodconfig".
> But there is no dependency to avoid this getting enabled by allmodconfig
> (such as 'depends on !COMPILE_TEST') so I don't see the point in the
> current form; 'default n' does nothing to prevent it. Regardless, I
> agree with Nick's sentiment below.
>
>>> Signed-off-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com>
>>> ---
>>>   Makefile          | 5 +++++
>>>   lib/Kconfig.debug | 7 +++++++
>>>   2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
>>> index ebd48fc956a3..1790a3624358 100644
>>> --- a/Makefile
>>> +++ b/Makefile
>>> @@ -880,6 +880,11 @@ endif
>>>   KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-disable-warning, unused-but-set-variable)
>>>   KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-disable-warning, unused-const-variable)
>>>
>>> +# check implicit enum conversion
>>> +ifdef CONFIG_ENUM_CONVERSION
>>> +KBUILD_CFLAGS += -Wenum-conversion
>>> +endif
>> Having a kconfig for this is overkill.  cc-option with a comment about
>> the compiler default versions is the way to go.
Got it.
> Agreed. If there is some reason -Wenum-conversion cannot be enabled for
> GCC right now (such as existing warnings, which the commit message
> appears to alude to), they should be cleaned up first then
> -Wenum-conversion should just be unconditionally enabled for all
> compilers that support it via cc-option, not half enabled via Kconfig so
> that maybe people will clean up the warnings. That is not how enabling
> warnings works:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/CAHk-=wg-mH-_GYpkhz_psjBWG6ZcjKnPo83fg7YMj_by+-LRTQ@mail.gmail.com/

Have sent the patches to fix the involving warnings.

If all the concerned warnings were repaired, I would send the v2 again.

Thanks all.

>>> +
>>>   # These result in bogus false positives
>>>   KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-disable-warning, dangling-pointer)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
>>> index 4f2b81229a2f..a64e06a747d8 100644
>>> --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
>>> +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
>>> @@ -417,6 +417,13 @@ config FRAME_WARN
>>>            Setting this too low will cause a lot of warnings.
>>>            Setting it to 0 disables the warning.
>>>
>>> +config ENUM_CONVERSION
>>> +       bool "Warn for implicit enum conversion"
>>> +       depends on GCC_VERSION >= 100300
>>> +       default n
>>> +       help
>>> +         Tell gcc to warn at build time for implicit enum conversion.
>>> +
>>>   config STRIP_ASM_SYMS
>>>          bool "Strip assembler-generated symbols during link"
>>>          default n
>>> --
>>> 2.25.1
>>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Thanks,
>> ~Nick Desaulniers
>>