From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Jones <andrew.jones@linux.dev>,
Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] KVM: selftests: Fix "fix hypercall test" build errors
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 09:04:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <27ff7009-ee8a-facc-681c-d229cec84b91@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220908233134.3523339-1-seanjc@google.com>
Am 09.09.22 um 01:31 schrieb Sean Christopherson:
> After a toolchain upgrade (I think), the x86 fix_hypercall_test started
> throwing warnings due to -Werror=array-bounds rightly complaining that
> the test is generating an out-of-bounds array access.
>
> The "obvious" fix is to replace the memcpy() with a memcmp() and compare
> only the exact size of the hypercall instruction. That worked, until I
> fiddled with the code a bit more and suddenly the test started jumping into
> the weeds due to gcc generating a call to the external memcmp() through the
> PLT, which isn't supported in the selftests.
>
> To fix that mess, which has been a pitfall for quite some time, provide
> implementations of memcmp(), memcpy(), and memset() to effectively override
> the compiler built-ins. My thought is to start with the helpers that are
> most likely to be used in guest code, and then add more as needed.
>
> Tested on x86 and ARM, compile tested on RISC-V and s390. Full testing on
> RISC-V and s390 would be welcome, the seemingly benign addition of memxxx()
> helpers managed to break ARM due to gcc generating an infinite loop for
> memset() (see patch 1 for details).
Seems to run fine on s390.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-22 7:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-08 23:31 Sean Christopherson
2022-09-08 23:31 ` [PATCH 1/5] KVM: selftests: Implement memcmp(), memcpy(), and memset() for guest use Sean Christopherson
2022-09-22 17:29 ` David Matlack
2022-09-22 17:40 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-09-22 17:49 ` David Matlack
2022-09-22 18:20 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-09-08 23:31 ` [PATCH 2/5] KVM: selftests: Compare insn opcodes directly in fix_hypercall_test Sean Christopherson
2022-09-19 21:17 ` Oliver Upton
2022-09-08 23:31 ` [PATCH 3/5] KVM: selftests: Remove unnecessary register shuffling " Sean Christopherson
2022-09-19 21:19 ` Oliver Upton
2022-09-08 23:31 ` [PATCH 4/5] KVM: selftests: Explicitly verify KVM doesn't patch hypercall if quirk==off Sean Christopherson
2022-09-19 21:23 ` Oliver Upton
2022-09-20 18:46 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-09-08 23:31 ` [PATCH 5/5] KVM: selftests: Dedup subtests of fix_hypercall_test Sean Christopherson
2022-09-19 21:26 ` Oliver Upton
2022-09-22 7:04 ` Christian Borntraeger [this message]
2022-09-22 17:20 ` [PATCH 0/5] KVM: selftests: Fix "fix hypercall test" build errors David Matlack
2022-09-22 17:53 ` Jim Mattson
2022-09-22 18:15 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=27ff7009-ee8a-facc-681c-d229cec84b91@linux.ibm.com \
--to=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=andrew.jones@linux.dev \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=atishp@atishpatra.org \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®