From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
To: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
John Johansen <jjohansen@suse.de>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@suse.de>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: vfs-fix-d_path-for-unreachable-paths.patch
Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2009 10:22:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2818.1252160549@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2078 bytes --]
This patch apparently does something resembling what it's supposed to - the
first few lines of /proc/mounts now looks like:
% head -5 /proc/mounts
rootfs (unreachable)/ rootfs rw 0 0
/dev/root / ext3 rw,seclabel,noatime,nodiratime,user_xattr,acl,data=writeback,us
rquota,grpquota 0 0
/dev /dev tmpfs rw,seclabel,relatime,mode=755 0 0
/proc /proc proc rw,relatime 0 0
/sys /sys sysfs rw,relatime 0 0
The now-unreachable rootfs is the letftover initrd rootfs.
The patch commentary notes:
> This patch addresses all these issues, by prefixing such unreachable paths
> with "(unreachable)". This isn't perfect since the returned path may
> still be a valid _relative_ path, and applications may not check the
> result of getcwd() for starting with a '/' before using it.
It turns out that some things don't check the contents of /proc/mounts for
starting with a / before using it either:
# /sbin/restorecon -v /etc/passwd
Full path required for exclude: (unreachable)/.
And strace shows it's a read of /proc/mounts, not a getcwd() call:
....
open("/proc/self/task/11479/attr/current", O_RDONLY) = 3
read(3, "staff_u:sysadm_r:setfiles_t:s0\0"..., 4095) = 31
close(3) = 0
uname({sys="Linux", node="turing-police.cc.vt.edu", ...}) = 0
open("/proc/mounts", O_RDONLY) = 3
fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0444, st_size=0, ...}) = 0
mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x7fe
9ce36a000
read(3, "rootfs (unreachable)/ rootfs rw 0"..., 1024) = 1024
write(2, "Full path required for exclude: ("..., 48) = 48
The added "(unreachable) text also gives /etc/rc0.d/S01halt indigestion,
because it thinks it can do stuff like:
awk '$2 !~ /\/(|dev|proc|selinux|sys)$/ && $1 !~ /^\/dev\/ram/ { print $2 }' \
/proc/mounts | sort -r | \
while read line; do
$UMOUNT -f $line
done
Somebody is buggy here, but I'm not sure who. The initrd for leaving a dangling
reference, the patch for breaking /proc/mounts, or /sbin/restorecon and the
shutdown script for being far too trusting of what the kernel tells it?
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 226 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2009-09-05 17:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-05 14:22 Valdis.Kletnieks [this message]
2009-09-07 8:30 ` vfs-fix-d_path-for-unreachable-paths.patch Miklos Szeredi
2009-09-07 8:38 ` [patch 1/2] vfs: seq_file: add helpers for data filling Miklos Szeredi
2009-09-07 8:41 ` [patch 2/2] vfs: revert /proc/mounts to old behavior for unreachable mountpoints Miklos Szeredi
2009-09-09 21:15 ` [patch 1/2] vfs: seq_file: add helpers for data filling Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2818.1252160549@turing-police.cc.vt.edu \
--to=valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=agruen@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jjohansen@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=mszeredi@suse.cz \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®