mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robin.randhawa@arm.com,
	Steve.Bannister@arm.com, Liviu.Dudau@arm.com,
	charles.garcia-tobin@arm.com, linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org,
	francescolavra.fl@gmail.com, toddpoynor@google.com,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/4] cpufreq: Add Kconfig option to enable/disable have_multiple_policies
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 00:53:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2852709.b79tkCt2uQ@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0289db340545c87d8e4aac7184dd91177eeb9a43.1360568193.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

On Monday, February 11, 2013 01:20:02 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> have_multiple_policies is required by platforms having multiple clock-domains
> for cpus, i.e. supporting multiple policies for cpus. This patch adds in a
> Kconfig option for enabling execution of this code.
> 
> Reported-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig | 3 +++
>  include/linux/cpufreq.h | 4 ++++
>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig
> index cbcb21e..e6e6939 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig
> @@ -23,6 +23,9 @@ config CPU_FREQ_TABLE
>  config CPU_FREQ_GOV_COMMON
>  	bool
>  
> +config CPU_FREQ_HAVE_MULTIPLE_POLICIES
> +	bool
> +

So I suppose some architectures will select this, right?

What architecture they are?

>  config CPU_FREQ_STAT
>  	tristate "CPU frequency translation statistics"
>  	select CPU_FREQ_TABLE
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> index c5ac9a5..0d84bfa 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> @@ -107,11 +107,13 @@ struct cpufreq_policy {
>  	unsigned int		policy; /* see above */
>  	struct cpufreq_governor	*governor; /* see below */
>  	void			*governor_data;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_HAVE_MULTIPLE_POLICIES
>  	/* This should be set by init() of platforms having multiple
>  	 * clock-domains, i.e.  supporting multiple policies. With this sysfs
>  	 * directories of governor would be created in cpu/cpu<num>/cpufreq/
>  	 * directory */
>  	bool			have_multiple_policies;
> +#endif

I'm not really sure I like this. ->

>  	struct work_struct	update; /* if update_policy() needs to be
>  					 * called, but you're in IRQ context */
> @@ -142,9 +144,11 @@ static inline bool policy_is_shared(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>  static inline struct kobject *
>  get_governor_parent_kobj(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>  {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_HAVE_MULTIPLE_POLICIES
>  	if (policy->have_multiple_policies)
>  		return &policy->kobj;
>  	else
> +#endif
>  		return cpufreq_global_kobject;

-> I wonder why don't you arrange things so that policy->kobj is always
returned, but it points to cpufreq_global_kobject in case there's only one
(i.e. make policy->kobj a pointer)?

>  }

Thanks,
Rafael


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-21 23:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-11  7:49 [PATCH V2 0/4] CPUFreq: Implement per policy instances of governors Viresh Kumar
2013-02-11  7:50 ` [PATCH V2 1/4] cpufreq: Add per policy governor-init/exit infrastructure Viresh Kumar
2013-02-21 23:35   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-02-22  2:08     ` Viresh Kumar
2013-02-22  2:21       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-02-22  2:19         ` Viresh Kumar
2013-02-22  2:31     ` Viresh Kumar
2013-02-11  7:50 ` [PATCH V2 2/4] cpufreq: governor: Implement per policy instances of governors Viresh Kumar
2013-02-22  2:23   ` Viresh Kumar
2013-02-11  7:50 ` [PATCH V2 3/4] cpufreq: Add Kconfig option to enable/disable have_multiple_policies Viresh Kumar
2013-02-21 23:53   ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2013-02-22  2:14     ` Viresh Kumar
2013-02-22  2:29       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-02-22  2:44         ` Viresh Kumar
2013-02-11  7:50 ` [PATCH V2 4/4] cpufreq: Get rid of "struct global_attr" Viresh Kumar
2013-02-21 23:45   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-02-22  2:17     ` Viresh Kumar
2013-02-22  2:33       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-02-22  2:32         ` Viresh Kumar
2013-02-22  2:46 ` [PATCH V2 0/4] CPUFreq: Implement per policy instances of governors Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2852709.b79tkCt2uQ@vostro.rjw.lan \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=Liviu.Dudau@arm.com \
    --cc=Steve.Bannister@arm.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=charles.garcia-tobin@arm.com \
    --cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=francescolavra.fl@gmail.com \
    --cc=linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.randhawa@arm.com \
    --cc=toddpoynor@google.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome