mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
To: "Emilio López" <emilio.lopez@collabora.co.uk>
Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk,
	riandrews@android.com, daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch,
	John.C.Harrison@Intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, ghackmann@google.com,
	robdclark@gmail.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, daniels@collabora.com,
	arve@android.com, emil.l.velikov@gmail.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
	Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] Tests for sync infrastructure
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2016 07:08:52 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2857d05a-2653-b490-7a0d-993f6859c7a4@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <39b7b048-e8fb-87d3-6663-53a6ec82b5d9@kernel.org>

On 12/01/2016 06:17 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 10/19/2016 06:49 AM, Emilio López wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> This is a series of tests to exercise the sync kernel infrastructure. It is
>> meant to be a test suite for the work Gustavo has been doing to destage it.
>>
>> These tests were originally part of a battery of tests shipping with
>> Android's libsync that were rewritten to use the new userspace interfaces.
>>
>> This is the second iteration of the test suite. Main changes over v1 are
>> a reworked Makefile and small code style fixes.
>>
>> If you are testing this on v4.9-rc1, do note that the last test will
>> currently fail due to a regression[0].
> 
> Hi Emilio,
> 
> Thanks. I will apply these to linux-kselftest next for 4.10-rc1
> 
> -- Shuah
>>
>> As usual, all comments are welcome.
>>

Hi Emilio,

Applied to linux-kselftest next. Could you take a look at the output
and see if it can be refined. Does [BAD] mean the test failed? Results
could refined to help user understand if a test failed or not clearly.
This can be done in a separate patch as a fix in one of the 4.01-rcs

thanks,
-- Shuah

      reply	other threads:[~2016-12-02 14:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-21 21:11 [PATCH " Emilio López
2016-09-21 21:11 ` [PATCH 1/7] selftest: sync: basic tests for sw_sync framework Emilio López
2016-09-22  9:43   ` Michael Ellerman
2016-09-22 14:23     ` Emilio López
2016-09-27  4:23       ` Michael Ellerman
2016-09-27 14:51         ` Emilio López
2016-10-05  1:00           ` Michael Ellerman
2016-09-21 21:12 ` [PATCH 2/7] selftest: sync: fence " Emilio López
2016-09-21 21:12 ` [PATCH 3/7] selftest: sync: merge " Emilio López
2016-09-21 21:12 ` [PATCH 4/7] selftest: sync: wait " Emilio López
2016-09-21 21:12 ` [PATCH 5/7] selftest: sync: stress test for parallelism Emilio López
2016-09-21 21:12 ` [PATCH 6/7] selftest: sync: stress consumer/producer test Emilio López
2016-09-21 21:12 ` [PATCH 7/7] selftest: sync: stress test for merges Emilio López
2016-10-19 12:49 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] Tests for sync infrastructure Emilio López
2016-10-19 12:49   ` [PATCH v2 1/7] selftest: sync: basic tests for sw_sync framework Emilio López
2016-11-01 16:18     ` Gustavo Padovan
2016-12-13 16:46       ` Shuah Khan
2016-10-19 12:49   ` [PATCH v2 2/7] selftest: sync: fence " Emilio López
2016-10-19 12:49   ` [PATCH v2 3/7] selftest: sync: merge " Emilio López
2016-10-19 12:49   ` [PATCH v2 4/7] selftest: sync: wait " Emilio López
2016-10-19 12:49   ` [PATCH v2 5/7] selftest: sync: stress test for parallelism Emilio López
2016-10-19 12:49   ` [PATCH v2 6/7] selftest: sync: stress consumer/producer test Emilio López
2016-10-19 12:49   ` [PATCH v2 7/7] selftest: sync: stress test for merges Emilio López
2016-12-02  1:17   ` [PATCH v2 0/7] Tests for sync infrastructure Shuah Khan
2016-12-02 14:08     ` Shuah Khan [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2857d05a-2653-b490-7a0d-993f6859c7a4@kernel.org \
    --to=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=John.C.Harrison@Intel.com \
    --cc=arve@android.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=daniels@collabora.com \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=emil.l.velikov@gmail.com \
    --cc=emilio.lopez@collabora.co.uk \
    --cc=ghackmann@google.com \
    --cc=gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=riandrews@android.com \
    --cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
    --cc=shuahkh@osg.samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®