From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
yang.zhang.wz@gmail.com, feng.wu@intel.com, rkrcmar@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] kvm: x86: do not use KVM_REQ_EVENT for APICv interrupt injection
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 10:21:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <286c39fb-6ba3-3267-dff6-b04ee4cbb1c7@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160928020319-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
On 28/09/2016 01:07, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:20:12PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Since bf9f6ac8d749 ("KVM: Update Posted-Interrupts Descriptor when vCPU
>> is blocked", 2015-09-18) the posted interrupt descriptor is checked
>> unconditionally for PIR.ON. Therefore we don't need KVM_REQ_EVENT to
>> trigger the scan and, if NMIs or SMIs are not involved, we can avoid
>> the complicated event injection path.
>>
>> However, there is a race between vmx_deliver_posted_interrupt and
>> vcpu_enter_guest. Fix it by disabling interrupts before vcpu->mode is
>> set to IN_GUEST_MODE.
>
> Could you describe the race a bit more please?
> I'm surprised that locally disabling irqs
> fixes a race with a different CPUs.
The posted interrupt IPI has a dummy handler in arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
(smp_kvm_posted_intr_ipi). It only does something if it is received
while the guest is running.
So local_irq_disable has an interesting side effect. Because the
interrupt will not be processed until the guest is entered,
local_irq_disable effectively switches the IRQ handler from the dummy
handler to the processor's posted interrupt handling.
So you want to do that before setting IN_GUEST_MODE, otherwise the IPI
sent by deliver_posted_interrupt is ignored.
However, the patch is wrong, because this bit:
if (kvm_lapic_enabled(vcpu)) {
/*
* Update architecture specific hints for APIC
* virtual interrupt delivery.
*/
if (vcpu->arch.apicv_active)
kvm_x86_ops->hwapic_irr_update(vcpu,
kvm_lapic_find_highest_irr(vcpu));
}
also has to be moved after setting IN_GUEST_MODE. Basically the order
for interrupt injection is:
(1) set PIR
smp_wmb()
(2) set ON
smp_mb()
(3) read vcpu->mode
if IN_GUEST_MODE
(4a) send posted interrupt IPI
else
(4b) kick (i.e. cmpxchg vcpu->mode from IN_GUEST_MODE to
EXITING_GUEST_MODE and send reschedule IPI)
while the order for entering the guest must be the opposite. The
numbers on the left identify the pairing between interrupt injection and
vcpu_entr_guest
(4a) enable posted interrupt processing (i.e. disable interrupts!)
(3) set vcpu->mode to IN_GUEST_MODE
smp_mb()
(2) read ON
if ON then
(1) read PIR
sync PIR to IRR
(4b) read vcpu->mode
if vcpu->mode == EXITING_GUEST_MODE then
cancel vmentry
(3/2/1) # posted interrupts are processed on the next vmentry
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-28 8:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-27 21:20 [RFC PATCH 0/3] kvm: x86: speedups for APICv Paolo Bonzini
2016-09-27 21:20 ` [PATCH 1/3] kvm: x86: avoid atomic operations on APICv vmentry Paolo Bonzini
2016-09-27 21:20 ` [PATCH 2/3] kvm: x86: do not use KVM_REQ_EVENT for APICv interrupt injection Paolo Bonzini
2016-09-27 23:07 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-09-28 8:21 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2016-09-28 11:40 ` Wu, Feng
2016-09-28 11:50 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-09-28 12:06 ` Wu, Feng
2016-09-28 12:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-10-14 7:37 ` Yang Zhang
2016-10-14 8:12 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-09-28 13:46 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-09-28 14:08 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-09-28 10:04 ` Wu, Feng
2016-09-28 10:16 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-09-28 11:53 ` Wu, Feng
2016-09-28 11:55 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-09-28 12:07 ` Wu, Feng
2016-10-14 7:12 ` Yang Zhang
2016-09-27 21:20 ` [PATCH 3/3] KVM: x86: do not scan IRR twice on APICv vmentry Paolo Bonzini
2016-09-28 14:00 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-09-28 14:44 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-09-29 2:51 ` Wu, Feng
2016-10-14 7:32 ` Yang Zhang
2016-10-14 7:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-09-29 19:55 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] kvm: x86: speedups for APICv Radim Krčmář
2016-09-29 21:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-09-30 13:23 ` Radim Krčmář
2016-09-30 13:33 ` Radim Krčmář
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=286c39fb-6ba3-3267-dff6-b04ee4cbb1c7@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=feng.wu@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=yang.zhang.wz@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®