mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@linaro.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 3/7] cpufreq / sched: Check cpu_of(rq) in cpufreq_update_util()
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 01:36:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2892951.2FPdDYdaoa@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3752826.3sXAQIvcIA@vostro.rjw.lan>

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

All of the callers of cpufreq_update_util() check whether or not
cpu_of(rq) is equal to smp_processor_id() before calling it and pass
rq_clock(rq) to it as the time argument, so rework it to take a
runqueue pointer as the argument and move the cpu_of(rq) check and
the rq_clock(rq) evaluation into it.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
 kernel/sched/deadline.c |    3 +--
 kernel/sched/fair.c     |    5 +----
 kernel/sched/rt.c       |    3 +--
 kernel/sched/sched.h    |   11 +++++++----
 4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

Index: linux-pm/kernel/sched/deadline.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ linux-pm/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -733,8 +733,7 @@ static void update_curr_dl(struct rq *rq
 	}
 
 	/* kick cpufreq (see the comment in kernel/sched/sched.h). */
-	if (cpu_of(rq) == smp_processor_id())
-		cpufreq_update_util(rq_clock(rq));
+	cpufreq_update_util(rq);
 
 	schedstat_set(curr->se.statistics.exec_max,
 		      max(curr->se.statistics.exec_max, delta_exec));
Index: linux-pm/kernel/sched/fair.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ linux-pm/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -2871,8 +2871,6 @@ static inline u64 cfs_rq_clock_task(stru
 static inline void cfs_rq_util_change(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
 {
 	if (&this_rq()->cfs == cfs_rq) {
-		struct rq *rq = rq_of(cfs_rq);
-
 		/*
 		 * There are a few boundary cases this might miss but it should
 		 * get called often enough that that should (hopefully) not be
@@ -2889,8 +2887,7 @@ static inline void cfs_rq_util_change(st
 		 *
 		 * See cpu_util().
 		 */
-		if (cpu_of(rq) == smp_processor_id())
-			cpufreq_update_util(rq_clock(rq));
+		cpufreq_update_util(rq_of(cfs_rq));
 	}
 }
 
Index: linux-pm/kernel/sched/rt.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/kernel/sched/rt.c
+++ linux-pm/kernel/sched/rt.c
@@ -958,8 +958,7 @@ static void update_curr_rt(struct rq *rq
 		return;
 
 	/* Kick cpufreq (see the comment in kernel/sched/sched.h). */
-	if (cpu_of(rq) == smp_processor_id())
-		cpufreq_update_util(rq_clock(rq));
+	cpufreq_update_util(rq);
 
 	schedstat_set(curr->se.statistics.exec_max,
 		      max(curr->se.statistics.exec_max, delta_exec));
Index: linux-pm/kernel/sched/sched.h
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ linux-pm/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -1760,7 +1760,7 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct update_util_data
 
 /**
  * cpufreq_update_util - Take a note about CPU utilization changes.
- * @time: Current time.
+ * @rq: Runqueue to carry out the update for.
  *
  * This function is called by the scheduler on every invocation of
  * update_load_avg() on the CPU whose utilization is being updated.
@@ -1779,16 +1779,19 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct update_util_data
  * but that really is a band-aid.  Going forward it should be replaced with
  * solutions targeted more specifically at RT and DL tasks.
  */
-static inline void cpufreq_update_util(u64 time)
+static inline void cpufreq_update_util(struct rq *rq)
 {
 	struct update_util_data *data;
 
+	if (cpu_of(rq) != smp_processor_id())
+		return;
+
 	data = rcu_dereference_sched(*this_cpu_ptr(&cpufreq_update_util_data));
 	if (data)
-		data->func(data, time);
+		data->func(data, rq_clock(rq));
 }
 #else
-static inline void cpufreq_update_util(u64 time) {}
+static inline void cpufreq_update_util(struct rq *rq) {}
 #endif /* CONFIG_CPU_FREQ */
 
 #ifdef arch_scale_freq_capacity

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-07-31 23:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-31 23:31 [RFC][PATCH 0/7] cpufreq / sched: cpufreq_update_util() flags and iowait boosting Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-07-31 23:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/7] cpufreq / sched: Make schedutil access utilization data directly Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-08-01 19:28   ` Steve Muckle
2016-08-01 23:46     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-08-02 10:38       ` Juri Lelli
2016-08-02 14:28         ` Steve Muckle
2016-08-02 14:43           ` Juri Lelli
2016-08-08 10:38       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-31 23:35 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/7] cpufreq / sched: Drop cpufreq_trigger_update() Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-07-31 23:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2016-08-01  7:29   ` [RFC][PATCH 3/7] cpufreq / sched: Check cpu_of(rq) in cpufreq_update_util() Dominik Brodowski
2016-08-01 14:57     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-08-01 19:48     ` Steve Muckle
2016-08-01 23:43       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-07-31 23:36 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/7] cpufreq / sched: Add flags argument to cpufreq_update_util() Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-08-01  7:33   ` Dominik Brodowski
2016-08-01 14:57     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-08-01 19:59       ` Steve Muckle
2016-08-01 23:44         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-08-02  1:36           ` Steve Muckle
2016-07-31 23:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/7] cpufreq / sched: UUF_IO flag to indicate iowait condition Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-08-02  1:22   ` Steve Muckle
2016-08-02  1:37     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-08-02 22:02       ` Steve Muckle
2016-08-02 22:38         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-08-04  2:24           ` Steve Muckle
2016-08-04 21:19             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-08-04 22:09               ` Steve Muckle
2016-08-05 23:36                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-07-31 23:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/7] cpufreq: schedutil: Add iowait boosting Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-08-02  1:35   ` Steve Muckle
2016-08-02 23:03     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-07-31 23:38 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/7] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Change P-state selection algorithm for Core Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-08-04  4:18   ` Doug Smythies
2016-08-04  6:53   ` Doug Smythies
2016-08-06  0:02     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-08-09 17:16       ` Doug Smythies
2016-08-13 15:59       ` Doug Smythies
2016-08-19 14:47         ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-20  1:06           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-08-20  6:40           ` Doug Smythies
2016-08-22 18:53         ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-08-22 22:53           ` Doug Smythies
2016-08-23  3:48   ` Wanpeng Li
2016-08-23  4:08     ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-08-23  4:50       ` Wanpeng Li
2016-08-23 17:30         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-08-01 15:26 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/7] cpufreq / sched: cpufreq_update_util() flags and iowait boosting Doug Smythies
2016-08-01 16:30   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-08-08 11:08     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-08 13:01       ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2892951.2FPdDYdaoa@vostro.rjw.lan \
    --to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=juri.lelli@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=steve.muckle@linaro.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®