mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Chen, Yu C" <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, <oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev>,
	<lkp@intel.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <x86@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	"Vincent Guittot" <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	<aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [tip:sched/core] [sched/smp] 06ddd17521: BUG:using_smp_processor_id()in_preemptible
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 16:00:46 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <292e70ed-aae5-4f52-8f85-80cba7ff301d@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250710062528.T-Obm39T@linutronix.de>

Hi Sebastian,

On 7/10/2025 2:25 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2025-07-10 11:18:29 [+0800], Chen, Yu C wrote:
>>> [ 25.235357][ T1] dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:123 (discriminator 1))
>>> [ 25.235357][ T1] check_preemption_disabled (arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:85 lib/smp_processor_id.c:53)
>>> [ 25.235357][ T1] __kvm_is_vmx_supported (arch/x86/include/asm/cpuid/api.h:74 arch/x86/include/asm/cpuid/api.h:113 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:2789)
>>> [ 25.235357][ T1] vmx_init (arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:2808 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:8653)
>>> [ 25.235357][ T1] vt_init (arch/x86/kvm/vmx/main.c:1072)
> …
>> I took a glance at the warning, before this patch,
>> is_percpu_thread() always return true when CONFIG_SMP is not set.
>> After this patch,
>> is_percpu_thread() checks the current task's CPU affinity.
>> So debug_smp_processor_id() -> check_preemption_disabled() ->
>> is_percpu_thread() might not always return true anymore, which caused
>> the warning.
>>
>> Actually the issue is in __kvm_is_vmx_supported(), should
>> we use something like this below:
> 
> No, it should not. If you look closely you will see that the call chains
> is
>     vmx_init() -> kvm_is_vmx_supported() -> __kvm_is_vmx_supported()
> 
> There is a migrate_disable() around __kvm_is_vmx_supported(). So why
> does this warning trigger then?
> 

migrate_disable() disables the task migration between CPUs by restricting
the task's affinity, but it does not disable the preemption on single
CPUs IMO. The scope of guard(preempt)() in migrate_disable() is just
within the migrate_disable(). debug_smp_processor_id() warns when the
preemption is enabled.

Thanks,
Chenyu


  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-10  8:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-10  2:58 kernel test robot
2025-07-10  3:18 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-07-10  6:25   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-07-10  8:00     ` Chen, Yu C [this message]
2025-07-10  8:11       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-07-10  8:27         ` [PATCH] lib/smp_processor_id: Make migration check unconditional of SMP Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-07-10  8:32           ` Chen, Yu C
2025-07-10 10:13             ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-11 12:41           ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-07-10  8:29         ` [tip:sched/core] [sched/smp] 06ddd17521: BUG:using_smp_processor_id()in_preemptible Chen, Yu C
2025-07-10 10:47           ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-07-10 11:31             ` Chen, Yu C

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=292e70ed-aae5-4f52-8f85-80cba7ff301d@intel.com \
    --to=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=aubrey.li@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®