* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/52] 5.10.243-rc1 review
2025-09-07 19:57 [PATCH 5.10 00/52] 5.10.243-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2025-09-08 2:05 ` Florian Fainelli
2025-09-08 9:27 ` Brett A C Sheffield
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2025-09-08 2:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow,
conor, hargar, broonie, achill
On 9/7/2025 12:57 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.243 release.
> There are 52 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Tue, 09 Sep 2025 19:55:53 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.243-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/52] 5.10.243-rc1 review
2025-09-07 19:57 [PATCH 5.10 00/52] 5.10.243-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-09-08 2:05 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2025-09-08 9:27 ` Brett A C Sheffield
2025-09-08 15:01 ` Jon Hunter
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Brett A C Sheffield @ 2025-09-08 9:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill,
Brett A C Sheffield
# Librecast Test Results
010/010 [ OK ] libmld
120/120 [ OK ] liblibrecast
CPU/kernel: Linux auntie 5.10.243-rc1-00089-g910e09235335 #67 SMP Mon Sep 8 06:59:48 -00 2025 x86_64 AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
Tested-by: Brett A C Sheffield <bacs@librecast.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/52] 5.10.243-rc1 review
2025-09-07 19:57 [PATCH 5.10 00/52] 5.10.243-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-09-08 2:05 ` Florian Fainelli
2025-09-08 9:27 ` Brett A C Sheffield
@ 2025-09-08 15:01 ` Jon Hunter
2025-09-08 18:14 ` Naresh Kamboju
2025-09-09 1:45 ` Dominique Martinet
4 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2025-09-08 15:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill,
linux-tegra, stable
On Sun, 07 Sep 2025 21:57:20 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.243 release.
> There are 52 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Tue, 09 Sep 2025 19:55:53 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.243-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.10:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail
67 tests: 67 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.10.243-rc1-g910e09235335
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/52] 5.10.243-rc1 review
2025-09-07 19:57 [PATCH 5.10 00/52] 5.10.243-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-08 15:01 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2025-09-08 18:14 ` Naresh Kamboju
2025-09-09 14:20 ` Naresh Kamboju
2025-09-09 1:45 ` Dominique Martinet
4 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2025-09-08 18:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill,
Netdev, Anders Roxell, Arnd Bergmann, Dan Carpenter,
David S. Miller, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Ben Copeland
On Mon, 8 Sept 2025 at 01:38, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.243 release.
> There are 52 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Tue, 09 Sep 2025 19:55:53 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.243-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
While building Linux stable-rc 5.10.243-rc1 the arm64 allyesconfig
builds failed.
* arm64, build
- gcc-12-allyesconfig
Regression Analysis:
- New regression? yes
- Reproducibility? yes
Build regression: stable-rc 5.10.243-rc1 arm64 allyesconfig
qede_main.c:204:17: error: field name not in record or union
initializer
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
### build log
drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_main.c:204:17: error: field name
not in record or union initializer
204 | .arfs_filter_op = qede_arfs_filter_op,
| ^
This was reported on the Linux next-20250428 tag,
https://lore.kernel.org/all/CA+G9fYs+7-Jut2PM1Z8fXOkBaBuGt0WwTUvU=4cu2O8iQdwUYw@mail.gmail.com/
## Build
* kernel: 5.10.243-rc1
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git commit: 910e092353351549f4857c48c68cc154c84305e8
* git describe: v5.10.241-89-g910e09235335
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.241-89-g910e09235335
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.10.241-35-g4576ee67df7a)
* arm64, build
- gcc-12-allyesconfig
Build log: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/api/testruns/29791464/log_file/
Build details: https://regressions.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/v5.10.241-89-g910e09235335/build/gcc-12-allyesconfig/
Build link: https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/32O3Hlq8fZQUSOfU5gyju24xQit/
Build config: https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/32O3Hlq8fZQUSOfU5gyju24xQit/config
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/52] 5.10.243-rc1 review
2025-09-08 18:14 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2025-09-09 14:20 ` Naresh Kamboju
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2025-09-09 14:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill,
Netdev, Anders Roxell, Arnd Bergmann, Dan Carpenter,
David S. Miller, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Ben Copeland
On Mon, 8 Sept 2025 at 23:44, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 8 Sept 2025 at 01:38, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.243 release.
> > There are 52 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Tue, 09 Sep 2025 19:55:53 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.243-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
>
> While building Linux stable-rc 5.10.243-rc1 the arm64 allyesconfig
> builds failed.
>
> * arm64, build
> - gcc-12-allyesconfig
>
> Regression Analysis:
> - New regression? yes
> - Reproducibility? yes
>
>
> Build regression: stable-rc 5.10.243-rc1 arm64 allyesconfig
> qede_main.c:204:17: error: field name not in record or union
> initializer
>
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
>
> ### build log
> drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_main.c:204:17: error: field name
> not in record or union initializer
> 204 | .arfs_filter_op = qede_arfs_filter_op,
> | ^
>
Please ignore this allyesconfig build failure for now on 5.15 and 5.10.
Seems like it is my local builder issue.
- Naresh
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/52] 5.10.243-rc1 review
2025-09-07 19:57 [PATCH 5.10 00/52] 5.10.243-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-08 18:14 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2025-09-09 1:45 ` Dominique Martinet
4 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Dominique Martinet @ 2025-09-09 1:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill
Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote on Sun, Sep 07, 2025 at 09:57:20PM +0200:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.243 release.
> There are 52 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Tue, 09 Sep 2025 19:55:53 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.243-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
Tested 910e09235335 ("Linux 5.10.243-rc1") on:
- arm i.MX6ULL (Armadillo 640)
- arm64 i.MX8MP (Armadillo G4)
No obvious regression in dmesg or basic tests:
Tested-by: Dominique Martinet <dominique.martinet@atmark-techno.com>
--
Dominique Martinet
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread