From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Stefano Radaelli <stefano.radaelli21@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Xu Liang <lxu@maxlinear.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: phy: add driver for MaxLinear MxL86110 PHY
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 18:33:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2b2ef0bd-6491-41a0-b2e1-81e2b83167ef@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250515152432.77835-1-stefano.radaelli21@gmail.com>
> +/* only 1 page for MXL86110 */
> +#define MXL86110_DEFAULT_PAGE 0
> +/**
> + * mxl86110_read_page - Read current page number
> + * @phydev: Pointer to the PHY device
> + *
> + * Return: The currently selected page number, or negative errno on failure.
> + */
> +static int mxl86110_read_page(struct phy_device *phydev)
> +{
> + return __phy_read(phydev, MXL86110_EXTD_REG_ADDR_OFFSET);
> +};
If there is only one page, does these make any sense?
> +static int mxl86110_write_page(struct phy_device *phydev, int page)
> +{
> + return __phy_write(phydev, MXL86110_EXTD_REG_ADDR_OFFSET, page);
> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * mxl86110_write_extended_reg() - write to a PHY's extended register
> + * @phydev: pointer to a &struct phy_device
> + * @regnum: register number to write
> + * @val: value to write to @regnum
> + *
> + * NOTE: This function assumes the caller already holds the MDIO bus lock
> + * or otherwise has exclusive access to the PHY. If exclusive access
> + * cannot be guaranteed, please use mxl86110_locked_write_extended_reg()
> + * which handles locking internally.
> + *
> + * returns 0 or negative error code
> + */
> +static int mxl86110_write_extended_reg(struct phy_device *phydev, u16 regnum, u16 val)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = __phy_write(phydev, MXL86110_EXTD_REG_ADDR_OFFSET, regnum);
This is confusing. It looks identical to mxl86110_write_page(). So
regnum is actually page?
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return __phy_write(phydev, MXL86110_EXTD_REG_ADDR_DATA, val);
And within that page, there is a single register at address
MXL86110_EXTD_REG_ADDR_DATA?
If you keep the write_page() and read_page(), it looks like you can
replace this with
return phy_write_paged(phydev, regnum,
MXL86110_EXTD_REG_ADDR_DATA,
val);
> +static int mxl86110_set_wol(struct phy_device *phydev, struct ethtool_wolinfo *wol)
> +{
> + struct net_device *netdev;
> + int page_to_restore;
> + const u8 *mac;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + if (wol->wolopts & WAKE_MAGIC) {
> + netdev = phydev->attached_dev;
> + if (!netdev)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + page_to_restore = phy_select_page(phydev, MXL86110_DEFAULT_PAGE);
> + if (page_to_restore < 0)
> + goto error;
If there is only one page, i think this can be removed. And everywhere
else in the driver.
> + /*
> + * RX_CLK delay (RXDLY) enabled via CHIP_CFG register causes a fixed
> + * delay of approximately 2 ns at 125 MHz or 8 ns at 25/2.5 MHz.
> + * Digital delays in RGMII_CFG1 register are additive
> + */
> + switch (phydev->interface) {
> + case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII:
> + val = 0;
> + break;
> + case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_RXID:
> + val = MXL86110_EXT_RGMII_CFG1_RX_DELAY_150PS;
This should be 2000ps, or the nearest you can get to it.
> + break;
> + case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_TXID:
> + val = MXL86110_EXT_RGMII_CFG1_TX_1G_DELAY_2250PS |
> + MXL86110_EXT_RGMII_CFG1_TX_10MB_100MB_DELAY_2250PS;
> + break;
> + case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_ID:
> + val = MXL86110_EXT_RGMII_CFG1_TX_1G_DELAY_2250PS |
> + MXL86110_EXT_RGMII_CFG1_TX_10MB_100MB_DELAY_2250PS;
> + val |= MXL86110_EXT_RGMII_CFG1_RX_DELAY_150PS;
Same here.
> + break;
> + default:
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto err_restore_page;
> + }
> + ret = mxl86110_modify_extended_reg(phydev, MXL86110_EXT_RGMII_CFG1_REG,
> + MXL86110_EXT_RGMII_CFG1_FULL_MASK, val);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto err_restore_page;
> +
> + /* Configure RXDLY (RGMII Rx Clock Delay) to keep the default
> + * delay value on RX_CLK (2 ns for 125 MHz, 8 ns for 25 MHz/2.5 MHz)
> + */
> + ret = mxl86110_modify_extended_reg(phydev, MXL86110_EXT_CHIP_CFG_REG,
> + MXL86110_EXT_CHIP_CFG_RXDLY_ENABLE, 1);
So does the value 1 here mean 8ns? 0 would be 2ns?
Andrew
---
pw-bot: cr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-15 16:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-15 15:24 Stefano Radaelli
2025-05-15 16:33 ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2025-05-15 17:23 ` Stefano Radaelli
2025-05-15 17:54 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-05-15 16:36 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-05-15 18:48 Stefano Radaelli
2025-05-15 19:03 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-05-16 10:43 ` Stefano Radaelli
2025-05-15 19:15 ` Heiner Kallweit
2025-05-16 10:46 ` Stefano Radaelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2b2ef0bd-6491-41a0-b2e1-81e2b83167ef@lunn.ch \
--to=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=lxu@maxlinear.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stefano.radaelli21@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®