From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>,
arjan@linux.intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, karahmed@amazon.de,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com, peterz@infradead.org,
pbonzini@redhat.com, ak@linux.intel.com,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, gregkh@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86/cpufeatures: Add AMD feature bits for Prediction Command
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 11:36:32 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2b3e25cc-286d-8bd0-aeaf-9ac4aae39de8@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4eb681c76b549ddad43544f2b487106c.squirrel@twosheds.infradead.org>
On 1/21/2018 6:22 AM, David Woodhouse wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 12:03:31PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
>>> AMD doesn't implement the Speculation Control MSR that Intel does, but
>>> the Prediction Control MSR does exist and is advertised by a separate
>>> CPUID bit. Add support for that.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
>>> ---
>>> arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h | 1 +
>>> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c | 1 +
>>> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
>>> b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
>>> index adebdaa..624d978 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
>>> @@ -207,6 +207,7 @@
>>> #define X86_FEATURE_RETPOLINE_AMD ( 7*32+13) /* AMD Retpoline
>>> mitigation for Spectre variant 2 */
>>> #define X86_FEATURE_INTEL_PPIN ( 7*32+14) /* Intel Processor Inventory
>>> Number */
>>>
>>> +#define X86_FEATURE_AMD_PRED_CMD ( 7*32+17) /* Prediction Command MSR
>>> (AMD) */
You should use the existing 0x80000008 EBX entry for this.
>>
>> Right, so this bit I've seen being called differently. Tom, can you
>> clarify pls?
>
> Yeah, that's fat-fingered in a cut/paste in refactoring. Fixed in what I
> posted this morning. I would like to see public docs with it though...
> Tom?
I'm looking to see if we have our specification posted on a public link.
But, in the meantime, AMD will advertise all three features (IBRS, IBPB
and STIBP) in separate CPUID bits:
IBPB: 0x80000008 EBX[12]
IBRS: 0x80000008 EBX[14]
STIBP: 0x80000008 EBX[15]
And we will follow the Intel specification should we set the bits in
CPUID 0x7.
For example, IBPB support would be indicated by CPUID:
0x80000008 EBX[12] || 0x7 EDX[26]
Thanks,
Tom
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-21 17:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-20 12:03 [PATCH 0/4] Basic Speculation Control feature support David Woodhouse
2018-01-20 12:03 ` [PATCH 1/4] x86/cpufeatures: Add Intel feature bits for Speculation Control David Woodhouse
2018-01-20 20:29 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-20 21:51 ` Steven Noonan
2018-01-20 21:57 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-20 12:03 ` [PATCH 2/4] x86/cpufeatures: Add AMD feature bits for Prediction Command David Woodhouse
2018-01-21 12:16 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-21 12:22 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-21 12:34 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-21 12:41 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-21 17:36 ` Tom Lendacky [this message]
2018-01-21 17:51 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-20 12:03 ` [PATCH 3/4] x86/msr: Add definitions for new speculation control MSRs David Woodhouse
2018-01-20 12:03 ` [PATCH 4/4] x86/pti: Do not enable PTI on fixed Intel processors David Woodhouse
2018-01-20 20:08 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-20 20:13 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-20 20:13 ` Woodhouse, David
2018-01-20 20:13 ` Woodhouse, David
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2b3e25cc-286d-8bd0-aeaf-9ac4aae39de8@amd.com \
--to=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=gregkh@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=karahmed@amazon.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®