mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ray Lee" <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>
To: "Diego Calleja" <diegocg@gmail.com>
Cc: "Bill Davidsen" <davidsen@tmr.com>,
	"Linux Kernel M/L" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Sched - graphic smoothness under load - cfs-v13 sd-0.48
Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 13:55:52 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2c0942db0705191355x740bf664ud36c3cc4b39d210f@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070519223603.8d70cd6e.diegocg@gmail.com>

On 5/19/07, Diego Calleja <diegocg@gmail.com> wrote:
> El Sat, 19 May 2007 16:02:37 -0400, Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com> escribió:
>
> > The chart is at http://www.tmr.com/~davidsen/sched_smooth_01.html for
> > your viewing pleasure. The only "tuned" result was with sd, since what I
> > observed was so bad using the default settings. If any scheduler
> > developers would like me to try other tunings or new versions let me know.
>
> How useful is glxgears as benchmark here? The X.org people has been saying
> for ages that "glxgears is not a benchmark".

If you hold everything in the system constant other than the
scheduler, then it's a useful measure of the effects the scheduler has
upon glxgears, regardless of how well or poorly written it might be.

I suspect the X.org people are correct in regards how most people
would try to use it, which would be measurements against different
video cards, CPUs, etc.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-19 20:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-19 20:02 Bill Davidsen
2007-05-19 20:22 ` Ray Lee
2007-05-20  0:44   ` Bill Davidsen
2007-05-20  6:12     ` Michael Gerdau
2007-05-20  6:30       ` Ray Lee
2007-05-20  6:59         ` Michael Gerdau
2007-05-20  7:20           ` Ray Lee
2007-05-20  6:55     ` Ray Lee
2007-05-21 18:27     ` Matt Keenan
2007-05-19 20:36 ` Diego Calleja
2007-05-19 20:55   ` Ray Lee [this message]
2007-05-19 23:21   ` Mike Galbraith
2007-05-20 16:29 ` Miguel Figueiredo
2007-05-20 16:44   ` Ray Lee
2007-05-20 16:58     ` Miguel Figueiredo
2007-05-20 17:19       ` Ray Lee
2007-05-22 17:55       ` Bill Davidsen
2007-05-22 20:01         ` Miguel Figueiredo
2007-05-23  0:28           ` Bill Davidsen
2007-05-23 13:10             ` Bill Davidsen
2007-05-23 18:29               ` Miguel Figueiredo
2007-05-23 20:45                 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-05-23 21:03                   ` Miguel Figueiredo
2007-05-24  0:36             ` Con Kolivas
2007-05-23  4:06               ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-05-23  5:23               ` Michael Gerdau
2007-05-23  7:58                 ` Xavier Bestel
2007-05-23  8:21                   ` Bill Huey
2007-05-23 18:22                   ` Ian Romanick
2007-05-23 18:43                     ` Xavier Bestel
2007-05-23 17:22                 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-05-23 16:59               ` Bill Davidsen
2007-05-22 17:22   ` Bill Davidsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2c0942db0705191355x740bf664ud36c3cc4b39d210f@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=ray-lk@madrabbit.org \
    --cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
    --cc=diegocg@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®