From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Kathiravan Thirumoorthy <quic_kathirav@quicinc.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] watchdog: qcom: fine tune the max timeout value calculation
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 07:02:47 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2c4f9829-138d-41a5-8810-d13cf749fded@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240116-wdt-v2-1-501c7694c3f0@quicinc.com>
On 1/16/24 00:22, Kathiravan Thirumoorthy wrote:
> To determine the max_timeout value, the below calculation is used.
>
> max_timeout = 0x10000000 / clk_rate
>
> cat /sys/devices/platform/soc@0/b017000.watchdog/watchdog/watchdog0/max_timeout
> 8388
>
> However, this is not valid for all the platforms. IPQ SoCs starting from
> IPQ40xx and recent Snapdragron SoCs also has the bark and bite time field
> length of 20bits, which can hold max up to 32 seconds if the clk_rate is
> 32KHz.
>
> If the user tries to configure the timeout more than 32s, then the value
> will be truncated and the actual value will not be reflected in the HW.
>
> To avoid this, lets add a variable called max_tick_count in the device data,
> which defines max counter value of the WDT controller. Using this, max-timeout
> will be calculated in runtime for various WDT contorllers.
>
> With this change, we get the proper max_timeout as below and restricts
> the user from configuring the timeout higher than this.
>
> cat /sys/devices/platform/soc@0/b017000.watchdog/watchdog/watchdog0/max_timeout
> 32
>
> Signed-off-by: Kathiravan Thirumoorthy <quic_kathirav@quicinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - drop the minimum timeout change from 30s to 32s
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240111-wdt-v1-1-28c648b3b1f3@quicinc.com
> ---
> drivers/watchdog/qcom-wdt.c | 7 +++++--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/qcom-wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/qcom-wdt.c
> index 9e790f0c2096..006f9c61aa64 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/qcom-wdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/qcom-wdt.c
> @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ static const u32 reg_offset_data_kpss[] = {
> struct qcom_wdt_match_data {
> const u32 *offset;
> bool pretimeout;
> + u32 max_tick_count;
> };
>
> struct qcom_wdt {
> @@ -177,11 +178,13 @@ static const struct watchdog_info qcom_wdt_pt_info = {
> static const struct qcom_wdt_match_data match_data_apcs_tmr = {
> .offset = reg_offset_data_apcs_tmr,
> .pretimeout = false,
> + .max_tick_count = 0x10000000U,
> };
>
> static const struct qcom_wdt_match_data match_data_kpss = {
> .offset = reg_offset_data_kpss,
> .pretimeout = true,
> + .max_tick_count = 0xFFFFFU,
> };
>
> static int qcom_wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> @@ -236,7 +239,7 @@ static int qcom_wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> */
> wdt->rate = clk_get_rate(clk);
> if (wdt->rate == 0 ||
> - wdt->rate > 0x10000000U) {
> + wdt->rate > data->max_tick_count) {
> dev_err(dev, "invalid clock rate\n");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> @@ -260,7 +263,7 @@ static int qcom_wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> wdt->wdd.ops = &qcom_wdt_ops;
> wdt->wdd.min_timeout = 1;
> - wdt->wdd.max_timeout = 0x10000000U / wdt->rate;
> + wdt->wdd.max_timeout = data->max_tick_count / wdt->rate;
> wdt->wdd.parent = dev;
> wdt->layout = data->offset;
>
>
> ---
> base-commit: 9e21984d62c56a0f6d1fc6f76b646212cfd7fe88
> change-id: 20240111-wdt-5bd079ecf14d
>
> Best regards,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-16 15:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-16 8:22 Kathiravan Thirumoorthy
2024-01-16 15:02 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2024-02-03 6:37 ` Kathiravan Thirumoorthy
2024-02-27 15:06 ` Kathiravan Thirumoorthy
2024-03-03 13:15 ` gituser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2c4f9829-138d-41a5-8810-d13cf749fded@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quic_kathirav@quicinc.com \
--cc=wim@linux-watchdog.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®