From: Kathiravan Thirumoorthy <quic_kathirav@quicinc.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>
Cc: <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] watchdog: qcom: fine tune the max timeout value calculation
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 20:36:56 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9f084781-2233-4b36-8b1c-db1fa9a9db49@quicinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <67ed3805-40cb-4f00-9d0d-b0fd012d6221@quicinc.com>
On 2/3/2024 12:07 PM, Kathiravan Thirumoorthy wrote:
>
>
> On 1/16/2024 8:32 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On 1/16/24 00:22, Kathiravan Thirumoorthy wrote:
>>> To determine the max_timeout value, the below calculation is used.
>>>
>>> max_timeout = 0x10000000 / clk_rate
>>>
>>> cat
>>> /sys/devices/platform/soc@0/b017000.watchdog/watchdog/watchdog0/max_timeout
>>> 8388
>>>
>>> However, this is not valid for all the platforms. IPQ SoCs starting from
>>> IPQ40xx and recent Snapdragron SoCs also has the bark and bite time
>>> field
>>> length of 20bits, which can hold max up to 32 seconds if the clk_rate is
>>> 32KHz.
>>>
>>> If the user tries to configure the timeout more than 32s, then the value
>>> will be truncated and the actual value will not be reflected in the HW.
>>>
>>> To avoid this, lets add a variable called max_tick_count in the
>>> device data,
>>> which defines max counter value of the WDT controller. Using this,
>>> max-timeout
>>> will be calculated in runtime for various WDT contorllers.
>>>
>>> With this change, we get the proper max_timeout as below and restricts
>>> the user from configuring the timeout higher than this.
>>>
>>> cat
>>> /sys/devices/platform/soc@0/b017000.watchdog/watchdog/watchdog0/max_timeout
>>> 32
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kathiravan Thirumoorthy <quic_kathirav@quicinc.com>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
>
>
> Guenter / Will, Can this be picked for v6.9? I don't see this in linux-
> next yet, so please consider this as a gentle reminder!
Guenter / Will, Gentle Reminder... is this change queued for v6.9?
>
>>
>>> ---
>>> Changes in v2:
>>> - drop the minimum timeout change from 30s to 32s
>>> - Link to v1:
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240111-wdt-v1-1-28c648b3b1f3@quicinc.com
>>> ---
>>> drivers/watchdog/qcom-wdt.c | 7 +++++--
>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/qcom-wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/qcom-wdt.c
>>> index 9e790f0c2096..006f9c61aa64 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/watchdog/qcom-wdt.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/qcom-wdt.c
>>> @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ static const u32 reg_offset_data_kpss[] = {
>>> struct qcom_wdt_match_data {
>>> const u32 *offset;
>>> bool pretimeout;
>>> + u32 max_tick_count;
>>> };
>>> struct qcom_wdt {
>>> @@ -177,11 +178,13 @@ static const struct watchdog_info
>>> qcom_wdt_pt_info = {
>>> static const struct qcom_wdt_match_data match_data_apcs_tmr = {
>>> .offset = reg_offset_data_apcs_tmr,
>>> .pretimeout = false,
>>> + .max_tick_count = 0x10000000U,
>>> };
>>> static const struct qcom_wdt_match_data match_data_kpss = {
>>> .offset = reg_offset_data_kpss,
>>> .pretimeout = true,
>>> + .max_tick_count = 0xFFFFFU,
>>> };
>>> static int qcom_wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> @@ -236,7 +239,7 @@ static int qcom_wdt_probe(struct platform_device
>>> *pdev)
>>> */
>>> wdt->rate = clk_get_rate(clk);
>>> if (wdt->rate == 0 ||
>>> - wdt->rate > 0x10000000U) {
>>> + wdt->rate > data->max_tick_count) {
>>> dev_err(dev, "invalid clock rate\n");
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>> }
>>> @@ -260,7 +263,7 @@ static int qcom_wdt_probe(struct platform_device
>>> *pdev)
>>> wdt->wdd.ops = &qcom_wdt_ops;
>>> wdt->wdd.min_timeout = 1;
>>> - wdt->wdd.max_timeout = 0x10000000U / wdt->rate;
>>> + wdt->wdd.max_timeout = data->max_tick_count / wdt->rate;
>>> wdt->wdd.parent = dev;
>>> wdt->layout = data->offset;
>>>
>>> ---
>>> base-commit: 9e21984d62c56a0f6d1fc6f76b646212cfd7fe88
>>> change-id: 20240111-wdt-5bd079ecf14d
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-27 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-16 8:22 Kathiravan Thirumoorthy
2024-01-16 15:02 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-02-03 6:37 ` Kathiravan Thirumoorthy
2024-02-27 15:06 ` Kathiravan Thirumoorthy [this message]
2024-03-03 13:15 ` gituser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9f084781-2233-4b36-8b1c-db1fa9a9db49@quicinc.com \
--to=quic_kathirav@quicinc.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=wim@linux-watchdog.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®