* Re: Subject: [PATCH] selftests/mm: add test for (BATCH_PROCESS)MADV_DONTNEED
[not found] ` <8c6a25de-be2d-4ed7-a59c-06f1737102aa@arm.com>
@ 2025-06-23 12:45 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Lorenzo Stoakes @ 2025-06-23 12:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: wang lian
Cc: Dev Jain, Andrew Morton, Shuah Khan, Christian Brauner,
linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-kselftest, SeongJae Park,
zijing.zhang, ryncsn, gkwang
On Sat, Jun 21, 2025 at 05:08:18PM +0530, Dev Jain wrote:
>
> On 21/06/25 4:40 pm, wang lian wrote:
> > From cb505647eb5f418d1ff5e807361f4c3a337c251f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Lian Wang <lianux.mm@gmail.com>
> > Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2025 18:51:49 +0800
> > Subject: [PATCH] selftests/mm: add test for (BATCH_PROCESS)MADV_DONTNEED
> >
> > Let's add a simple test for MADV_DONTNEED and PROCESS_MADV_DONTNEED,
> > and inspired by SeongJae Park's test at GitHub[1] add batch test
> > for PROCESS_MADV_DONTNEED,but for now it influence by workload and
> > need add some race conditions test.We can add it later.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lian Wang <lianux.mm@gmail.com>
> > References
> > ==========
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/sjp38/eval_proc_madvise
> >
> >
>
> Hello Lian,
>
>
> Thank you for your patch. Please configure your editor to take a TAB as 8
> spaces. And,
>
> your email client to sending plain text messages instead of HTML. Please
> resend the
>
> patch after making these changes.
Thanks for resending this, but please do put '[RESEND PATCH]' rather than
'[PATCH]' so we can differentiate!
Have reviewed the resent version.
Cheers, Lorenzo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread