* wanting to use mmap
@ 2007-12-31 10:06 Jack Andrews
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Jack Andrews @ 2007-12-31 10:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
hi all,
i read the O_DIRECT january thread:
http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kernel/2007/1/11/44365
i am interested in using mmap as a quick way of getting data
to and from disk. i also want to handle errors (like bad blocks)
as well as is possible using usual read/write calls.
would i be right in saying that
a) mmap+madvise+msync
provides almost the same function as
b) read/write(2)+posix_fadvise+fsync
i have read that fault-tolerance or error-handling is 'better'
using (b). what does this mean exactly? i note that write(2)
may return EIO - what happens if the same underlying error
occurs when accessing a mmap'ed file? i notice that in the
implementation of msync, fsync is called so errno might be
set to EIO...
ta, jack
(please cc: me)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2007-12-31 10:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-12-31 10:06 wanting to use mmap Jack Andrews
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®