From: Ross Philipson <ross.philipson@oracle.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
daniel.kiper@oracle.com, dpsmith@apertussolutions.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
luto@amacapital.net, kanth.ghatraju@oracle.com,
trenchboot-devel@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/boot: Fix memremap of setup_indirect structures
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 06:34:43 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2e584fc4-163a-0af4-abe0-9c14996918f2@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YgabtFd4Nkpgi+oW@zn.tnic>
On 2/11/22 12:24, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 12:04:15PM -0500, Ross Philipson wrote:
>> As documented, the setup_indirect structure is nested inside
>> the setup_data structures in the setup_data list. The code currently
>> accesses the fields inside the setup_indirect structure but only
>> the sizeof(struct setup_data) is being memremapped. No crash
>> occurred but this is just due to how the area is remapped under the
>> covers.
>>
>> The fix is to properly memremap both the setup_data and setup_indirect
>
> s/The fix is to properly/Properly/
Ack.
>
>> structures in these cases before accessing them.
>>
>> Fixes: b3c72fc9a78e ("x86/boot: Introduce setup_indirect")
>>
>
> No need for that space - Fixes belongs with the rest of the tags.
Got it. Will fix in both.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Ross Philipson <ross.philipson@oracle.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@oracle.com>
>
>> @@ -1015,18 +1019,23 @@ void __init e820__reserve_setup_data(void)
>> sizeof(*data) + data->len,
>> E820_TYPE_RAM, E820_TYPE_RESERVED_KERN);
>>
>> - if (data->type == SETUP_INDIRECT &&
>> - ((struct setup_indirect *)data->data)->type != SETUP_INDIRECT) {
>> - e820__range_update(((struct setup_indirect *)data->data)->addr,
>> - ((struct setup_indirect *)data->data)->len,
>> - E820_TYPE_RAM, E820_TYPE_RESERVED_KERN);
>> - e820__range_update_kexec(((struct setup_indirect *)data->data)->addr,
>> - ((struct setup_indirect *)data->data)->len,
>> - E820_TYPE_RAM, E820_TYPE_RESERVED_KERN);
>> + if (data->type == SETUP_INDIRECT) {
>> + len += data->len;
>> + early_memunmap(data, sizeof(*data));
>> + data = early_memremap(pa_data, len);
>
> Do I see it correctly that early_memremap() can return NULL?
It can if you run out of slots in the fixed map. The only reason I did
not check it for NULL was because it was not checked elsewhere for NULL.
I guess there are two questions:
1. Should I also fix it elsewhere in the code I am touching?
2. What should I do on an allocation failure? In a routine like this it
seems to be a critical early boot failure.
I guess the original intention might have been to let it just blow up
since there is no recovery but that is just conjecture...
>
>> + if (((struct setup_indirect *)data->data)->type != SETUP_INDIRECT) {
>> + e820__range_update(((struct setup_indirect *)data->data)->addr,
>> + ((struct setup_indirect *)data->data)->len,
>> + E820_TYPE_RAM, E820_TYPE_RESERVED_KERN);
>> + e820__range_update_kexec(((struct setup_indirect *)data->data)->addr,
>> + ((struct setup_indirect *)data->data)->len,
>> + E820_TYPE_RAM, E820_TYPE_RESERVED_KERN);
>> + }
>> }
>>
>> - pa_data = data->next;
>> - early_memunmap(data, sizeof(*data));
>> + pa_data = pa_next;
>> + early_memunmap(data, len);
>> }
>>
>> e820__update_table(e820_table);
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kdebugfs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kdebugfs.c
>> index 64b6da9..e5c72d8 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kdebugfs.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kdebugfs.c
>> @@ -92,7 +92,8 @@ static int __init create_setup_data_nodes(struct dentry *parent)
>> struct setup_data *data;
>> int error;
>> struct dentry *d;
>> - u64 pa_data;
>> + u64 pa_data, pa_next;
>> + u32 len;
>> int no = 0;
>
> The tip-tree preferred ordering of variable declarations at the
> beginning of a function is reverse fir tree order::
>
> struct long_struct_name *descriptive_name;
> unsigned long foo, bar;
> unsigned int tmp;
> int ret;
>
> The above is faster to parse than the reverse ordering::
>
> int ret;
> unsigned int tmp;
> unsigned long foo, bar;
> struct long_struct_name *descriptive_name;
>
> And even more so than random ordering::
>
> unsigned long foo, bar;
> int ret;
> struct long_struct_name *descriptive_name;
> unsigned int tmp;
>
> Please fix all cases in your patch.
Will do.
>
>> d = debugfs_create_dir("setup_data", parent);
>> @@ -112,12 +113,27 @@ static int __init create_setup_data_nodes(struct dentry *parent)
>> error = -ENOMEM;
>> goto err_dir;
>> }
>> -
>> - if (data->type == SETUP_INDIRECT &&
>> - ((struct setup_indirect *)data->data)->type != SETUP_INDIRECT) {
>> - node->paddr = ((struct setup_indirect *)data->data)->addr;
>> - node->type = ((struct setup_indirect *)data->data)->type;
>> - node->len = ((struct setup_indirect *)data->data)->len;
>> + pa_next = data->next;
>> +
>> + if (data->type == SETUP_INDIRECT) {
>> + len = sizeof(*data) + data->len;
>> + memunmap(data);
>> + data = memremap(pa_data, len, MEMREMAP_WB);
>> + if (!data) {
>
> Yap, you need similar error handling above.
>
>> + kfree(node);
>> + error = -ENOMEM;
>> + goto err_dir;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (((struct setup_indirect *)data->data)->type != SETUP_INDIRECT) {
>> + node->paddr = ((struct setup_indirect *)data->data)->addr;
>> + node->type = ((struct setup_indirect *)data->data)->type;
>> + node->len = ((struct setup_indirect *)data->data)->len;
>
> Pls use a helper variable here to not have this ugly casting on each line.
Will fix here and below.
>
>> + } else {
>> + node->paddr = pa_data;
>> + node->type = data->type;
>> + node->len = data->len;
>> + }
>> } else {
>> node->paddr = pa_data;
>> node->type = data->type;
>> @@ -125,7 +141,7 @@ static int __init create_setup_data_nodes(struct dentry *parent)
>> }
>>
>> create_setup_data_node(d, no, node);
>> - pa_data = data->next;
>> + pa_data = pa_next;
>>
>> memunmap(data);
>> no++;
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/ksysfs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/ksysfs.c
>> index d0a1912..4e8b794 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/ksysfs.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ksysfs.c
>> @@ -93,24 +93,35 @@ static int __init get_setup_data_size(int nr, size_t *size)
>> {
>> int i = 0;
>> struct setup_data *data;
>> - u64 pa_data = boot_params.hdr.setup_data;
>> + u64 pa_data = boot_params.hdr.setup_data, pa_next;
>> + u32 len;
>>
>> while (pa_data) {
>> data = memremap(pa_data, sizeof(*data), MEMREMAP_WB);
>> if (!data)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>> + pa_next = data->next;
>> +
>> if (nr == i) {
>> - if (data->type == SETUP_INDIRECT &&
>> - ((struct setup_indirect *)data->data)->type != SETUP_INDIRECT)
>> - *size = ((struct setup_indirect *)data->data)->len;
>> - else
>> + if (data->type == SETUP_INDIRECT) {
>> + len = sizeof(*data) + data->len;
>> + memunmap(data);
>> + data = memremap(pa_data, len, MEMREMAP_WB);
>> + if (!data)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + if (((struct setup_indirect *)data->data)->type != SETUP_INDIRECT)
>> + *size = ((struct setup_indirect *)data->data)->len;
>
> Ditto.
>
>> + else
>> + *size = data->len;
>> + } else
>> *size = data->len;
>
> Put the else branch in {} too pls, even if it is a single statement.
> Below too.
>
>>
>> memunmap(data);
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> - pa_data = data->next;
>> + pa_data = pa_next;
>> memunmap(data);
>> i++;
>> }
>> @@ -122,6 +133,7 @@ static ssize_t type_show(struct kobject *kobj,
>> {
>> int nr, ret;
>> u64 paddr;
>> + u32 len;
>> struct setup_data *data;
>>
>> ret = kobj_to_setup_data_nr(kobj, &nr);
>> @@ -135,9 +147,14 @@ static ssize_t type_show(struct kobject *kobj,
>> if (!data)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> - if (data->type == SETUP_INDIRECT)
>> + if (data->type == SETUP_INDIRECT) {
>> + len = sizeof(*data) + data->len;
>> + memunmap(data);
>> + data = memremap(paddr, len, MEMREMAP_WB);
>> + if (!data)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>
> <---- newline here.
Ok.
>
>> ret = sprintf(buf, "0x%x\n", ((struct setup_indirect *)data->data)->type);
>> - else
>> + } else
>> ret = sprintf(buf, "0x%x\n", data->type);
>> memunmap(data);
>> return ret;
>> @@ -165,10 +182,25 @@ static ssize_t setup_data_data_read(struct file *fp,
>> if (!data)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> - if (data->type == SETUP_INDIRECT &&
>> - ((struct setup_indirect *)data->data)->type != SETUP_INDIRECT) {
>> - paddr = ((struct setup_indirect *)data->data)->addr;
>> - len = ((struct setup_indirect *)data->data)->len;
>> + if (data->type == SETUP_INDIRECT) {
>> + len = sizeof(*data) + data->len;
>> + memunmap(data);
>> + data = memremap(paddr, len, MEMREMAP_WB);
>> + if (!data)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + if (((struct setup_indirect *)data->data)->type != SETUP_INDIRECT) {
>> + paddr = ((struct setup_indirect *)data->data)->addr;
>> + len = ((struct setup_indirect *)data->data)->len;
>
> Again a helper var pls.
>
>> + } else {
>> + /*
>> + * Even though this is technically undefined, return
>> + * the data as though it is a normal setup_data struct.
>> + * This will at least allow it to be inspected.
>> + */
>> + paddr += sizeof(*data);
>> + len = data->len;
>> + }
>> } else {
>> paddr += sizeof(*data);
>> len = data->len;
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
>> index f7a132e..6e29c20 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
>> @@ -370,20 +370,29 @@ static void __init parse_setup_data(void)
>> static void __init memblock_x86_reserve_range_setup_data(void)
>> {
>> struct setup_data *data;
>> - u64 pa_data;
>> + u64 pa_data, pa_next;
>> + u32 len;
>>
>> pa_data = boot_params.hdr.setup_data;
>> while (pa_data) {
>> data = early_memremap(pa_data, sizeof(*data));
>> + len = sizeof(*data);
>> + pa_next = data->next;
>> +
>> memblock_reserve(pa_data, sizeof(*data) + data->len);
>>
>> - if (data->type == SETUP_INDIRECT &&
>> - ((struct setup_indirect *)data->data)->type != SETUP_INDIRECT)
>> - memblock_reserve(((struct setup_indirect *)data->data)->addr,
>> - ((struct setup_indirect *)data->data)->len);
>> + if (data->type == SETUP_INDIRECT) {
>> + len += data->len;
>> + early_memunmap(data, sizeof(*data));
>> + data = early_memremap(pa_data, len);
>>
>> - pa_data = data->next;
>> - early_memunmap(data, sizeof(*data));
>> + if (((struct setup_indirect *)data->data)->type != SETUP_INDIRECT)
>> + memblock_reserve(((struct setup_indirect *)data->data)->addr,
>> + ((struct setup_indirect *)data->data)->len);
>
> Ditto.
>
>> + }
>> +
>> + pa_data = pa_next;
>> + early_memunmap(data, len);
>> }
>> }
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c b/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c
>> index 026031b..b45e86e 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c
>> @@ -636,10 +636,15 @@ static bool memremap_is_setup_data(resource_size_t phys_addr,
>> return true;
>> }
>>
>> - if (data->type == SETUP_INDIRECT &&
>> - ((struct setup_indirect *)data->data)->type != SETUP_INDIRECT) {
>> - paddr = ((struct setup_indirect *)data->data)->addr;
>> - len = ((struct setup_indirect *)data->data)->len;
>> + if (data->type == SETUP_INDIRECT) {
>> + memunmap(data);
>> + data = memremap(paddr, sizeof(*data) + len,
>> + MEMREMAP_WB | MEMREMAP_DEC);
>> +
>> + if (((struct setup_indirect *)data->data)->type != SETUP_INDIRECT) {
>> + paddr = ((struct setup_indirect *)data->data)->addr;
>> + len = ((struct setup_indirect *)data->data)->len;
>
> Ditto.
>
> Thx.
>
Thank you very much for the review.
Ross Philipson
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-15 11:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-27 17:04 [PATCH 0/2] x86/boot: Fix setup_indirect support Ross Philipson
2022-01-27 17:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/boot: Fix memremap of setup_indirect structures Ross Philipson
2022-02-11 17:24 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-02-15 11:34 ` Ross Philipson [this message]
2022-02-15 18:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-02-22 21:01 ` Ross Philipson
2022-02-24 13:42 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-02-24 15:13 ` Ross Philipson
2022-01-27 17:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86/boot: Add setup_indirect support in early_memremap_is_setup_data Ross Philipson
2022-02-11 18:41 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-02-15 11:36 ` Ross Philipson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2e584fc4-163a-0af4-abe0-9c14996918f2@oracle.com \
--to=ross.philipson@oracle.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=daniel.kiper@oracle.com \
--cc=dpsmith@apertussolutions.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kanth.ghatraju@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=trenchboot-devel@googlegroups.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®