Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/boot: Fix memremap of setup_indirect structures

[Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>]

On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 04:01:32PM -0500, Ross Philipson wrote:
> In the ioremap.c module, the check for NULL is only missing in the
> functions we updated but the lack of a check was already there before
> these changes went in.
> 
> In the setup.c and e820.c modules, the check for NULL is missing in the
> functions we updated but the lack of a check was already there before
> these changes went in in those functions. The lack of early_memremap()
> NULL checks can also be found in other functions in those modules.

I don't know how to understand this statement: are you saying that,
because there are other cases where - for whatever reason - the retval
check is not taking place - you should not do it either?

Because I can see other places where the return value is checked. I
mean, if the return value check doesn't matter, why not make this
function simply void and not bother at all?

> Fixing it in other functions and possibly elsewhere in the arch/x86 code
> seems to be out of scope for this patch set. We could send separate
> patches and hunt down other places this check is missing.

That would be appreciated.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette