From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
To: Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan94@gmail.com>,
patrick.bellasi@arm.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
peterz@infradead.org
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, bristot@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Xuewen.Yan@unisoc.com,
xuewyan@foxmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fair/util_est: Separate util_est_dequeue() for cfs_rq_util_change
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 12:30:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2edefcc7-ccea-5665-728e-5b86ac413629@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1607510656-22990-1-git-send-email-xuewen.yan@unisoc.com>
Hi Yan,
On 09/12/2020 11:44, Xuewen Yan wrote:
> when a task dequeued, it will update it's util, and cfs_rq_util_change
> would check rq's util, if the cfs_rq->avg.util_est.enqueued is bigger
> than cfs_rq->avg.util_avg, but because the cfs_rq->avg.util_est.enqueued
> didn't be decreased, this would cause bigger cfs_rq_util by mistake,
> as a result, cfs_rq_util_change may change freq unreasonablely.
>
> separate the util_est_dequeue() into util_est_dequeue() and
> util_est_update(), and dequeue the _task_util_est(p) before update util.
The issue is that sugov_update_[shared\|single] -> sugov_get_util() ->
cpu_util_cfs() operates on an old cfs_rq->avg.util_est.enqueued value?
cpu_util_cfs()
if (sched_feat(UTIL_EST))
util = max_t(util, READ_ONCE(rq->cfs.avg.util_est.enqueued))
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
dequeue_task_fair() (w/ your patch, moving (1) before (2))
/* (1) update cfs_rq->avg.util_est.enqueued */
util_est_dequeue()
/* (2) potential p->se.avg.util_avg update */
/* 2 for loops */
for_each_sched_entity()
/* this can only lead to a freq change for a root cfs_rq */
(dequeue_entity() ->) update_load_avg() -> cfs_rq_util_change()
-> cpufreq_update_util() ->...-> sugov_update_[shared\|single]
/* (3) potential update p->se.avg.util_est */
util_est_update()
We do need (3) after (2) because of:
util_est_update()
...
ue.enqueued = (task_util(p) | UTIL_AVG_UNCHANGED); task_util
... ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
p->se.avg.util_avg
Did I get this right?
[...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-11 11:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-09 10:44 Xuewen Yan
2020-12-11 11:30 ` Dietmar Eggemann [this message]
[not found] ` <CAB8ipk-z0e5XnkR__vW9+NAz_rFDpC3odLnPEthWZoHKVRSYWg@mail.gmail.com>
2020-12-14 18:46 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-12-15 9:39 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-12-15 12:56 ` Xuewen Yan
2020-12-15 17:56 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-12-15 17:59 ` Dietmar Eggemann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2edefcc7-ccea-5665-728e-5b86ac413629@arm.com \
--to=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=Xuewen.Yan@unisoc.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=patrick.bellasi@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=xuewen.yan94@gmail.com \
--cc=xuewyan@foxmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®