From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
To: Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan94@gmail.com>,
patrick.bellasi@arm.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
peterz@infradead.org
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, bristot@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Xuewen.Yan@unisoc.com,
xuewyan@foxmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fair/util_est: Separate util_est_dequeue() for cfs_rq_util_change
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 18:59:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d79da8c3-4904-c21f-9c7a-190ab6d12948@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1607510656-22990-1-git-send-email-xuewen.yan@unisoc.com>
On 09/12/2020 11:44, Xuewen Yan wrote:
> when a task dequeued, it will update it's util, and cfs_rq_util_change
> would check rq's util, if the cfs_rq->avg.util_est.enqueued is bigger
> than cfs_rq->avg.util_avg, but because the cfs_rq->avg.util_est.enqueued
> didn't be decreased, this would cause bigger cfs_rq_util by mistake,
> as a result, cfs_rq_util_change may change freq unreasonablely.
>
> separate the util_est_dequeue() into util_est_dequeue() and
> util_est_update(), and dequeue the _task_util_est(p) before update util.
I assume this patch header needs a little more substance so that less
involved folks understand the issue as well. Describing the testcase
which reveals the problem would help here too.
> Signed-off-by: Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan@unisoc.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index ae7ceba..20ecfd5 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -3946,11 +3946,9 @@ static inline bool within_margin(int value, int margin)
> }
>
> static void
> -util_est_dequeue(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct task_struct *p, bool task_sleep)
> +util_est_dequeue(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct task_struct *p)
Not sure why util_est_enqueue is inline and util_est_dequeue() and
util_est_update() aren't?
> {
> - long last_ewma_diff;
> struct util_est ue;
You would just need a 'unsigned int enqueued' here, like in util_est_enqueue().
> - int cpu;
>
> if (!sched_feat(UTIL_EST))
> return;
> @@ -3961,6 +3959,17 @@ static inline bool within_margin(int value, int margin)
> WRITE_ONCE(cfs_rq->avg.util_est.enqueued, ue.enqueued);
>
> trace_sched_util_est_cfs_tp(cfs_rq);
> +}
> +
> +static void
> +util_est_update(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct task_struct *p, bool task_sleep)
> +{
> + long last_ewma_diff;
> + struct util_est ue;
> + int cpu;
Nitpick: 'int cpu' not needed
---8<---
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index c3685a743a76..53dfb20d101e 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -3956,28 +3956,28 @@ static inline bool within_margin(int value, int margin)
return ((unsigned int)(value + margin - 1) < (2 * margin - 1));
}
-static void
-util_est_dequeue(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct task_struct *p)
+static inline void util_est_dequeue(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq,
+ struct task_struct *p)
{
- struct util_est ue;
+ unsigned int enqueued;
if (!sched_feat(UTIL_EST))
return;
/* Update root cfs_rq's estimated utilization */
- ue.enqueued = cfs_rq->avg.util_est.enqueued;
- ue.enqueued -= min_t(unsigned int, ue.enqueued, _task_util_est(p));
- WRITE_ONCE(cfs_rq->avg.util_est.enqueued, ue.enqueued);
+ enqueued = cfs_rq->avg.util_est.enqueued;
+ enqueued -= min_t(unsigned int, enqueued, _task_util_est(p));
+ WRITE_ONCE(cfs_rq->avg.util_est.enqueued, enqueued);
trace_sched_util_est_cfs_tp(cfs_rq);
}
-static void
-util_est_update(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct task_struct *p, bool task_sleep)
+static inline void util_est_update(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq,
+ struct task_struct *p,
+ bool task_sleep)
{
long last_ewma_diff;
struct util_est ue;
- int cpu;
if (!sched_feat(UTIL_EST))
return;
@@ -4021,8 +4021,7 @@ util_est_update(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct task_struct *p, bool task_sleep)
* To avoid overestimation of actual task utilization, skip updates if
* we cannot grant there is idle time in this CPU.
*/
- cpu = cpu_of(rq_of(cfs_rq));
- if (task_util(p) > capacity_orig_of(cpu))
+ if (task_util(p) > capacity_orig_of(cpu_of(rq_of(cfs_rq))))
return;
/*
--
2.17.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-15 18:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-09 10:44 Xuewen Yan
2020-12-11 11:30 ` Dietmar Eggemann
[not found] ` <CAB8ipk-z0e5XnkR__vW9+NAz_rFDpC3odLnPEthWZoHKVRSYWg@mail.gmail.com>
2020-12-14 18:46 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-12-15 9:39 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-12-15 12:56 ` Xuewen Yan
2020-12-15 17:56 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-12-15 17:59 ` Dietmar Eggemann [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d79da8c3-4904-c21f-9c7a-190ab6d12948@arm.com \
--to=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=Xuewen.Yan@unisoc.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=patrick.bellasi@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=xuewen.yan94@gmail.com \
--cc=xuewyan@foxmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®