mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>, Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>,
	Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ACPI / scan: Make acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() acquire the scan lock
Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2013 15:29:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3006340.mglZY9ZPKY@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2074190.mMzUc3TOxk@vostro.rjw.lan>

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The ACPI scan lock has been introduced to prevent acpi_bus_scan()
and acpi_bus_trim() from running in parallel with each other for
overlapping ACPI namespace scopes.  However, it is not sufficient
to do that, because if acpi_bus_scan() is run (for an overlapping
namespace scope) right after the acpi_bus_trim() in
acpi_bus_hot_remove_device(), the subsequent eject will remove
devices without removing the corresponding struct acpi_device
objects (and possibly companion "physical" device objects).
Therefore acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() has to acquire the scan
lock before carrying out the bus trimming and hold it through
the evaluation of _EJ0, so make that happen.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/scan.c |   31 +++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

Index: test/drivers/acpi/scan.c
===================================================================
--- test.orig/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++ test/drivers/acpi/scan.c
@@ -95,6 +95,8 @@ acpi_device_modalias_show(struct device
 }
 static DEVICE_ATTR(modalias, 0444, acpi_device_modalias_show, NULL);
 
+static void __acpi_bus_trim(struct acpi_device *start);
+
 /**
  * acpi_bus_hot_remove_device: hot-remove a device and its children
  * @context: struct acpi_eject_event pointer (freed in this func)
@@ -114,10 +116,12 @@ void acpi_bus_hot_remove_device(void *co
 	acpi_status status = AE_OK;
 	u32 ost_code = ACPI_OST_SC_NON_SPECIFIC_FAILURE; /* default */
 
+	mutex_lock(&acpi_scan_lock);
+
 	ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO,
 		"Hot-removing device %s...\n", dev_name(&device->dev)));
 
-	acpi_bus_trim(device);
+	__acpi_bus_trim(device);
 	/* Device node has been released. */
 	device = NULL;
 
@@ -146,18 +150,14 @@ void acpi_bus_hot_remove_device(void *co
 	status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_EJ0", &arg_list, NULL);
 	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
 		if (status != AE_NOT_FOUND)
-			printk(KERN_WARNING PREFIX
-					"Eject device failed\n");
-		goto err_out;
-	}
+			acpi_handle_warn(handle, "Eject failed\n");
 
-	kfree(context);
-	return;
+		/* Tell the firmware the hot-remove operation has failed. */
+		acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost(handle, ej_event->event,
+					  ost_code, NULL);
+	}
 
-err_out:
-	/* Inform firmware the hot-remove operation has completed w/ error */
-	(void) acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost(handle,
-				ej_event->event, ost_code, NULL);
+	mutex_unlock(&acpi_scan_lock);
 	kfree(context);
 	return;
 }
@@ -1686,10 +1686,8 @@ static acpi_status acpi_bus_remove(acpi_
 	return AE_OK;
 }
 
-void acpi_bus_trim(struct acpi_device *start)
+static void __acpi_bus_trim(struct acpi_device *start)
 {
-	mutex_lock(&acpi_scan_lock);
-
 	/*
 	 * Execute acpi_bus_device_detach() as a post-order callback to detach
 	 * all ACPI drivers from the device nodes being removed.
@@ -1704,7 +1702,12 @@ void acpi_bus_trim(struct acpi_device *s
 	acpi_walk_namespace(ACPI_TYPE_ANY, start->handle, ACPI_UINT32_MAX, NULL,
 			    acpi_bus_remove, NULL, NULL);
 	acpi_bus_remove(start->handle, 0, NULL, NULL);
+}
 
+void acpi_bus_trim(struct acpi_device *start)
+{
+	mutex_lock(&acpi_scan_lock);
+	__acpi_bus_trim(start);
 	mutex_unlock(&acpi_scan_lock);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_bus_trim);


  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-09 14:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-24  0:26 [RFC] ACPI scan handlers Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-25 16:52 ` Toshi Kani
2013-01-25 22:11   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-25 23:07     ` Toshi Kani
2013-01-26  1:49       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-26 14:03         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-26 18:42 ` Jiang Liu
2013-01-26 21:46   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-28 12:58 ` [PATCH 0/4] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-28 12:59   ` [PATCH 1/4] ACPI / scan: Introduce struct acpi_scan_handler Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-29  2:04     ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-01-29  2:29       ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-01-29  2:35     ` Toshi Kani
2013-01-29 11:28       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-29 14:50         ` Toshi Kani
2013-01-29 21:32           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-29 22:57             ` Toshi Kani
2013-01-29 23:19               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-29 23:27                 ` Toshi Kani
2013-01-30 13:18                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-02-03  0:52                     ` [PATCH] ACPI / scan: Follow priorities of IDs when matching scan handlers Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-02-03  4:54                       ` Yinghai Lu
2013-02-03 13:05                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-02-05 23:44                       ` Toshi Kani
2013-01-28 13:00   ` [PATCH 2/4] ACPI / PCI: Make PCI root driver use struct acpi_scan_handler Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-28 13:00   ` [PATCH 3/4] ACPI / PCI: Make PCI IRQ link " Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-28 13:01   ` [PATCH 4/4] ACPI / platform: Use struct acpi_scan_handler for creating devices Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-29  2:20     ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-01-29 11:36       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-29 12:30         ` [Update][PATCH " Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-29 23:51           ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-01-29  7:35     ` [PATCH " Mika Westerberg
2013-01-29 12:01       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-29  8:05     ` Mika Westerberg
2013-01-29 12:02       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-28 21:54   ` [PATCH 0/4] ACPI scan handlers Yinghai Lu
2013-01-29  0:38     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-29  2:33   ` Toshi Kani
2013-01-30  1:58   ` Toshi Kani
2013-01-30 13:36     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-02-03 23:45   ` [PATCH 0/2] ACPI scan handler for memory hotplug and container simplification Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-02-03 23:46     ` [PATCH 1/2] ACPI / scan: Make memory hotplug driver use struct acpi_scan_handler Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-02-03 23:47     ` [PATCH 2/2] ACPI / scan: Simplify container driver Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-02-06 22:32       ` Toshi Kani
2013-02-07  0:55         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-02-07  0:51           ` Toshi Kani
2013-02-07  1:32             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-02-07 14:32               ` Toshi Kani
2013-02-07 22:42                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-02-08  1:05                   ` Toshi Kani
2013-02-08 12:52                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-02-08 16:24                       ` Toshi Kani
2013-02-07  8:32       ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-02-07 11:43         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-02-07 14:38           ` Toshi Kani
2013-02-08  0:24       ` [PATCH 0/2] ACPI / scan: Remove useless #ifndef and simplify " Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-02-08  0:25         ` [PATCH 1/2] ACPI / scan: Remove useless #ifndef from acpi_eject_store() Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-02-08  0:27         ` [PATCH 2/2] ACPI / scan: Make container driver use struct acpi_scan_handler Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-02-08  3:32           ` Yinghai Lu
2013-02-08 12:45             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-02-08  3:19         ` [PATCH 0/2] ACPI / scan: Remove useless #ifndef and simplify container driver Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-02-08 12:46           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-02-08 16:57         ` Toshi Kani
2013-02-08 19:59           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-02-08 22:41             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-02-08 23:18               ` [PATCH] ACPI: Drop the container.h header file Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-02-08 23:27                 ` Toshi Kani
2013-02-09 14:26         ` [PATCH 0/2] ACPI / scan: Two fixes for device hot-removal Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-02-09 14:29           ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2013-02-11 23:42             ` [PATCH 1/2] ACPI / scan: Make acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() acquire the scan lock Toshi Kani
2013-02-09 14:31           ` [PATCH 2/2] ACPI / scan: Full transition to D3cold in acpi_device_unregister() Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3006340.mglZY9ZPKY@vostro.rjw.lan \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liuj97@gmail.com \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=toshi.kani@hp.com \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®