mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>,
	<steven.sistare@oracle.com>, <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>,
	<linux@armlinux.org.uk>, <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	<heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>, <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
	<sboyd@codeaurora.org>, <x86@kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
	<tglx@linutronix.de>, <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/6] time: sync read_boot_clock64() with persistent clock
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 11:47:41 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3049ead9-af20-a334-74ca-5efbb251e60f@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171109030201.5991-3-pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>

Hi Pavel,

At 11/09/2017 11:01 AM, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
> read_boot_clock64() returns a boot start timestamp from epoch. Some arches
> may need to access the persistent clock interface in order to calculate the
> epoch offset. The resolution of the persistent clock, however, might be
> low.  Therefore, in order to avoid time discrepancies a new argument 'now'
> is added to read_boot_clock64() parameters. Arch may decide to use it
> instead of accessing persistent clock again.
>
> Also, change read_boot_clock64() to have __init prototype since it is
> accessed only during boot.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/kernel/time.c      | 2 +-
>  arch/s390/kernel/time.c     | 2 +-
>  include/linux/timekeeping.h | 7 +++----
>  kernel/time/timekeeping.c   | 8 ++++++--
>  4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/time.c b/arch/arm/kernel/time.c
> index 629f8e9981f1..5b259261a268 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/time.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/time.c
> @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ void read_persistent_clock64(struct timespec64 *ts)
>  	__read_persistent_clock(ts);
>  }
>
> -void read_boot_clock64(struct timespec64 *ts)
> +void __init read_boot_clock64(struct timespec64 *now, struct timespec64 *ts)
>  {
>  	__read_boot_clock(ts);
>  }
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/time.c b/arch/s390/kernel/time.c
> index 5cbd52169348..780b770e6a89 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kernel/time.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/time.c
> @@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ void read_persistent_clock64(struct timespec64 *ts)
>  	ext_to_timespec64(clk, ts);
>  }
>
> -void read_boot_clock64(struct timespec64 *ts)
> +void __init read_boot_clock64(struct timespec64 *now, struct timespec64 *ts)
>  {
>  	unsigned char clk[STORE_CLOCK_EXT_SIZE];
>  	__u64 delta;
> diff --git a/include/linux/timekeeping.h b/include/linux/timekeeping.h
> index c198ab40c04f..73919982045e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/timekeeping.h
> +++ b/include/linux/timekeeping.h
> @@ -211,9 +211,8 @@ extern void ktime_get_snapshot(struct system_time_snapshot *systime_snapshot);
>   */
>  extern int persistent_clock_is_local;
>
> -extern void read_persistent_clock64(struct timespec64 *ts);
> -extern void read_boot_clock64(struct timespec64 *ts);
> -extern int update_persistent_clock64(struct timespec64 now);
> -
> +void read_persistent_clock64(struct timespec64 *ts);
> +void read_boot_clock64(struct timespec64 *now, struct timespec64 *ts);
> +int update_persistent_clock64(struct timespec64 now);
>

why we should remove the *extern* keyword?

Thanks,
	dou.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-13  3:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-09  3:01 [PATCH v8 0/6] Early boot time stamps for x86 Pavel Tatashin
2017-11-09  3:01 ` [PATCH v8 1/6] x86/tsc: remove tsc_disabled flag Pavel Tatashin
2017-11-13  3:52   ` Dou Liyang
2017-11-13 18:51     ` Pavel Tatashin
2017-11-09  3:01 ` [PATCH v8 2/6] time: sync read_boot_clock64() with persistent clock Pavel Tatashin
2017-11-13  3:47   ` Dou Liyang [this message]
2017-11-14 19:57     ` Pavel Tatashin
2017-11-15  2:47       ` Dou Liyang
2017-11-15  3:56         ` Pavel Tatashin
2017-11-09  3:01 ` [PATCH v8 3/6] x86/time: read_boot_clock64() implementation Pavel Tatashin
2017-11-09  3:01 ` [PATCH v8 4/6] sched: early boot clock Pavel Tatashin
2017-11-09  3:02 ` [PATCH v8 5/6] x86/paravirt: add active_sched_clock to pv_time_ops Pavel Tatashin
2017-11-09  3:02 ` [PATCH v8 6/6] x86/tsc: use tsc early Pavel Tatashin
2017-11-13  3:47   ` Dou Liyang
2017-11-14 21:46     ` Pavel Tatashin
2017-11-15  3:53       ` Dou Liyang
2017-11-15 16:01         ` Pavel Tatashin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3049ead9-af20-a334-74ca-5efbb251e60f@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@oracle.com \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=steven.sistare@oracle.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®