mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
To: "Naveen N Rao (AMD)" <naveen@kernel.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	 Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
	Vasant Hegde <vasant.hegde@amd.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] KVM: x86: Remove use of apicv_update_lock when toggling guest debug state
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2025 21:00:05 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <30fc469b5b2ec5e2d6703979a0d09ad0a9df29e1.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dc6cf3403e29c0296926e3bd8f0d4e87b67f4600.1738595289.git.naveen@kernel.org>

On Mon, 2025-02-03 at 22:33 +0530, Naveen N Rao (AMD) wrote:
> apicv_update_lock is not required when querying the state of guest
> debug in all the vcpus. Remove usage of the same, and switch to
> kvm_set_or_clear_apicv_inhibit() helper to simplify the code.

It might be worth to mention that the reason why the lock is not needed,
is because kvm_vcpu_ioctl from which this function is called takes 'vcpu->mutex'
and thus concurrent execution of this function is not really possible.

Besides this:

Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>

Best regards,
	Maxim Levitsky

> 
> Signed-off-by: Naveen N Rao (AMD) <naveen@kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 9 ++-------
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index b2d9a16fd4d3..11235e91ae90 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -12038,19 +12038,14 @@ static void kvm_arch_vcpu_guestdbg_update_apicv_inhibit(struct kvm *kvm)
>  	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
>  	unsigned long i;
>  
> -	if (!enable_apicv)
> -		return;
> -
> -	down_write(&kvm->arch.apicv_update_lock);
> -
>  	kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
>  		if (vcpu->guest_debug & KVM_GUESTDBG_BLOCKIRQ) {
>  			set = true;
>  			break;
>  		}
>  	}
> -	__kvm_set_or_clear_apicv_inhibit(kvm, APICV_INHIBIT_REASON_BLOCKIRQ, set);
> -	up_write(&kvm->arch.apicv_update_lock);
> +
> +	kvm_set_or_clear_apicv_inhibit(kvm, APICV_INHIBIT_REASON_BLOCKIRQ, set);
>  }
>  
>  int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_guest_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,





  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-04  2:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-03 17:03 [PATCH 0/3] KVM: x86: Address performance degradation due to APICv inhibits Naveen N Rao (AMD)
2025-02-03 17:03 ` [PATCH 1/3] KVM: x86: hyper-v: Convert synic_auto_eoi_used to an atomic Naveen N Rao (AMD)
2025-02-04  1:30   ` Maxim Levitsky
2025-02-04 13:09     ` Naveen N Rao
2025-02-04 19:33       ` Sean Christopherson
2025-02-05 11:00         ` Naveen N Rao
2025-02-03 17:03 ` [PATCH 2/3] KVM: x86: Remove use of apicv_update_lock when toggling guest debug state Naveen N Rao (AMD)
2025-02-04  2:00   ` Maxim Levitsky [this message]
2025-02-04 13:10     ` Naveen N Rao
2025-02-04 14:25     ` Naveen N Rao
2025-02-04 17:51       ` Sean Christopherson
2025-02-04 17:58         ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-02-04 19:42           ` Maxim Levitsky
2025-02-05 11:13         ` Naveen N Rao
2025-02-03 17:03 ` [PATCH 3/3] KVM: x86: Decouple APICv activation state from apicv_inhibit_reasons Naveen N Rao (AMD)
2025-02-03 18:45   ` Sean Christopherson
2025-02-03 22:22     ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-02-03 23:46       ` Sean Christopherson
2025-02-04  1:23         ` Maxim Levitsky
2025-02-04 19:18           ` Sean Christopherson
2025-02-04 20:08             ` Maxim Levitsky
2025-02-05  1:41               ` Sean Christopherson
2025-02-05 10:54                 ` Naveen N Rao
2025-02-05 11:36             ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-02-11 15:57               ` Naveen N Rao
2025-02-11 16:37                 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-02-11 18:13                   ` Naveen N Rao
2025-02-04 11:06         ` Naveen N Rao
2025-02-04 14:08           ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-02-11 14:37             ` Naveen N Rao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=30fc469b5b2ec5e2d6703979a0d09ad0a9df29e1.camel@redhat.com \
    --to=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=naveen@kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=vasant.hegde@amd.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®