Re[2]: Linux 2.2.20pre10

[victor <ixnay@infonegocio.com>]

Tuesday, October 23, 2001, 12:15:24 AM, you wrote:

SV> On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, PinkFreud wrote:

>> Why not take that a step further?  It would seem to me that your
>> insane interpretation of that insane law would mean that unix and it's
>> derivatives (Linux, anyone?) would be illegal to use as well

SV> Only partially correct.  Linux will certainly be illegal under SSSCA.
could something be illegal if you created 10 years before the law :??
or it could be illegal if you continue developing it :?
do you realy thing linux will be declare illegal and Linus will be
under this law if IBM, SGI, HP, COMPAQ and so many other computer
giants are developing for linux and linux is so popular, i dont think
that nobody could stop it
"It would seem to me that your
insane interpretation of that insane law would mean that unix and it's
derivatives"
if i read well SGI(irix) HP(HP-UX) SUN (SOLARIS & SUNos)
COMPAQ(True64, VMS) would crash
because unix is ilegal.... i dont think so
SV>  
SV> Read it.  UNIX is not.  And there's nothing insane about it.  That's what
SV> the proposed bill says.

>> Please don't tell me you woke up this morning and had a sudden attack of
>> conscience that you were violating US law.  You've posted such changes
i am a european citizen, i only wait to see if europe dont adopt that
law :/

SV> Perhaps a sudden realization, would be more like it.





Best regards,
 victor                            mailto:ixnay@infonegocio.com