From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
To: Song Hu <husong@kylinos.cn>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, usama.anjum@arm.com
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, shuah@kernel.org, ljs@kernel.org,
liam@infradead.org, vbabka@kernel.org, rppt@kernel.org,
surenb@google.com, mhocko@suse.com, peterx@redhat.com,
sarthak.sharma@arm.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] selftests/mm: emit TAP header and use TAP skip in mremap_test
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 11:33:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <316d740f-a942-4acb-a8a4-fb646effff91@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260825085756.63030-3-husong@kylinos.cn>
On 8/25/26 10:57, Song Hu wrote:
> mremap_test calls ksft_set_plan() without ksft_print_header(), and its
> get_mmap_min_addr() skip path uses a bare exit(KSFT_SKIP) that prints no
> TAP line, so its output is not valid KTAP. Add the header and switch
> the skip to ksft_exit_skip().
>
> Also fix two more KTAP compliance issues spotted in review:
>
> - get_mmap_min_addr() calls strerror(errno) after fclose(), which may
> clobber errno; save errno before fclose() instead.
>
> - Some ksft_*() messages embed "\n\t", so the text after each embedded
> newline is printed without the "# " prefix. Split those into separate
> messages.
>
> And cache mmap_min_addr in main() before ksft_set_plan(), so that the
> skip paths in get_mmap_min_addr() are taken before the plan is set; a
> skip after the plan leaves the run with fewer tests than planned.
>
> Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Sarthak Sharma <sarthak.sharma@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@arm.com>
> Tested-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@arm.com>
> Acked-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <ljs@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Song Hu <husong@kylinos.cn>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/mm/mremap_test.c | 43 ++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/mremap_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/mremap_test.c
> index 131d9d6db867..ab5420f2e875 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/mremap_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/mremap_test.c
> @@ -111,18 +111,17 @@ static unsigned long long get_mmap_min_addr(void)
> return addr;
>
> fp = fopen("/proc/sys/vm/mmap_min_addr", "r");
> - if (fp == NULL) {
> - ksft_print_msg("Failed to open /proc/sys/vm/mmap_min_addr: %s\n",
> - strerror(errno));
> - exit(KSFT_SKIP);
> - }
> + if (!fp)
> + ksft_exit_skip("Failed to open /proc/sys/vm/mmap_min_addr: %s\n",
> + strerror(errno));
>
> n_matched = fscanf(fp, "%llu", &addr);
> if (n_matched != 1) {
> - ksft_print_msg("Failed to read /proc/sys/vm/mmap_min_addr: %s\n",
> - strerror(errno));
> + int err = errno;
> +
> fclose(fp);
Why the local variable? And why the fclose() ?
ksft_exit_skip() will just exit the process and clean up, why clean up manually?
In other words, why not just drop the fclose?
> - exit(KSFT_SKIP);
> + ksft_exit_skip("Failed to read /proc/sys/vm/mmap_min_addr: %s\n",
> + strerror(err));
> }
>
> fclose(fp);
> @@ -1164,10 +1163,11 @@ static void run_mremap_test_case(struct test test_case, int *failures,
> rand_addr);
>
> if (remap_time < 0) {
> - if (test_case.expect_failure)
> - ksft_test_result_xfail("%s\n\tExpected mremap failure\n",
> - test_case.name);
Why can't we just drop the \n\t ?
> - else {
> + if (test_case.expect_failure) {
> + ksft_print_msg("%s: expected mremap failure\n",
> + test_case.name);
> + ksft_test_result_xfail("%s\n", test_case.name);
> + } else {
> ksft_test_result_fail("%s\n", test_case.name);
> *failures += 1;
> }
> @@ -1177,11 +1177,13 @@ static void run_mremap_test_case(struct test test_case, int *failures,
> * was faulted in.
> */
> if (threshold_mb == VALIDATION_NO_THRESHOLD ||
> - test_case.config.region_size <= threshold_mb * _1MB)
> - ksft_test_result_pass("%s\n\tmremap time: %12lldns\n",
> - test_case.name, remap_time);
Same question, why not drop the \n\t ?
--
Cheers,
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-10 9:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-25 8:57 [PATCH v4 0/3] selftests/mm: TAP output and global-state fixes Song Hu
2026-08-25 8:57 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] selftests/mm: emit TAP header in uffd-wp-mremap Song Hu
2026-09-10 9:28 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-08-25 8:57 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] selftests/mm: emit TAP header and use TAP skip in mremap_test Song Hu
2026-09-10 9:33 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm) [this message]
2026-08-25 8:57 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] selftests/mm: restore enable_soft_offline in hugetlb-soft-offline Song Hu
2026-08-25 9:06 ` Song Hu
2026-08-25 9:24 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2026-09-10 9:36 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=316d740f-a942-4acb-a8a4-fb646effff91@kernel.org \
--to=david@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=husong@kylinos.cn \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=sarthak.sharma@arm.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=usama.anjum@arm.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®