Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: adc: add Texas Instruments TLA 2528

[Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>]

On 29/12/2025 11:31, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2025 at 10:04 AM Matti Vaittinen
> <mazziesaccount@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 23/12/2025 20:26, David Lechner wrote:
>>> On 12/23/25 9:55 AM, Maxime Chevallier wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
>>> It looks like inputs can also be used as GPIOs, so
>>>
>>> gpio-controller: true
>>> #gpio-cells:
>>>     const: 2
>>>
>>> would be appropriate (it doesn't matter if the driver doesn't
>>> implement it, we know what the correct bindings are).
>>>
>>>> +
>>>> +  "#io-channel-cells":
>>>> +    const: 1
>>
>> I didn't check the data-sheet, but if the pins can be set to be GPIOs or
>> ADC inputs, then I would require channels to be specified. It's only 8
>> channels, so always listing channels that are present shouldn't be that
>> big of a problem - and it should avoid one to add extra properties to
>> denote channels used for GPIO if GPIOs need to be supported.
>>
>> Well, I am not insisting this, there are folks that know this stuff
>> better than I :)
> 
> Why would we need an extra property for that? GPIO controller has a
> property for valid_mask, should be enough to handle this case, no?
> 
Ah. You're right. The "valid_mask" should be perfectly usable.

I might still require the channel information to make it explicit - but 
as I said, I leave this for others to decide :)

Yours,
	-- Matti


---
Matti Vaittinen
Linux kernel developer at ROHM Semiconductors
Oulu Finland

~~ When things go utterly wrong vim users can always type :help! ~~