* [PATCH v3 1/2] gpio: davinci: Shuffle IRQ resource fetching from DT to beginning of probe
@ 2018-06-12 7:59 Keerthy
2018-06-12 7:59 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] gpio: davinci: Do not assume continuous IRQ numbering Keerthy
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Keerthy @ 2018-06-12 7:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linus.walleij
Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, grygorii.strashko, t-kristo, j-keerthy
This is needed in case of PROBE_DEFER if IRQ resource is not yet ready.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
---
Tested for GPIO Interrupts on da850-lcdk board.
Changes in v3:
Changed type of bank_irq to int from unsigned
* Changed irqs type from unsigned to int
drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c | 29 +++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
index 987126c..0ff2c0d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ static inline struct davinci_gpio_regs __iomem *irq2regs(struct irq_data *d)
return g;
}
-static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev);
+static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev, int bank_irq);
/*--------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ static int davinci_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
static int davinci_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
static int ctrl_num, bank_base;
- int gpio, bank, ret = 0;
+ int gpio, bank, bank_irq, ret = 0;
unsigned ngpio, nbank;
struct davinci_gpio_controller *chips;
struct davinci_gpio_platform_data *pdata;
@@ -209,6 +209,12 @@ static int davinci_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (IS_ERR(gpio_base))
return PTR_ERR(gpio_base);
+ bank_irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
+ if (bank_irq < 0) {
+ dev_dbg(dev, "IRQ not populated\n");
+ return bank_irq;
+ }
+
snprintf(label, MAX_LABEL_SIZE, "davinci_gpio.%d", ctrl_num++);
chips->chip.label = devm_kstrdup(dev, label, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!chips->chip.label)
@@ -243,7 +249,7 @@ static int davinci_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
goto err;
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, chips);
- ret = davinci_gpio_irq_setup(pdev);
+ ret = davinci_gpio_irq_setup(pdev, bank_irq);
if (ret)
goto err;
@@ -452,16 +458,15 @@ static struct irq_chip *keystone_gpio_get_irq_chip(unsigned int irq)
* (dm6446) can be set appropriately for GPIOV33 pins.
*/
-static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev)
+static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev, int bank_irq)
{
unsigned gpio, bank;
int irq;
int ret;
struct clk *clk;
u32 binten = 0;
- unsigned ngpio, bank_irq;
+ unsigned ngpio;
struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
- struct resource *res;
struct davinci_gpio_controller *chips = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
struct davinci_gpio_platform_data *pdata = dev->platform_data;
struct davinci_gpio_regs __iomem *g;
@@ -481,18 +486,6 @@ static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev)
gpio_get_irq_chip = (gpio_get_irq_chip_cb_t)match->data;
ngpio = pdata->ngpio;
- res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, 0);
- if (!res) {
- dev_err(dev, "Invalid IRQ resource\n");
- return -EBUSY;
- }
-
- bank_irq = res->start;
-
- if (!bank_irq) {
- dev_err(dev, "Invalid IRQ resource\n");
- return -ENODEV;
- }
clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "gpio");
if (IS_ERR(clk)) {
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 2/2] gpio: davinci: Do not assume continuous IRQ numbering
2018-06-12 7:59 [PATCH v3 1/2] gpio: davinci: Shuffle IRQ resource fetching from DT to beginning of probe Keerthy
@ 2018-06-12 7:59 ` Keerthy
2018-06-12 20:06 ` Grygorii Strashko
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Keerthy @ 2018-06-12 7:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linus.walleij
Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, grygorii.strashko, t-kristo, j-keerthy
Currently the driver assumes that the interrupts are continuous
and does platform_get_irq only once and assumes the rest are continuous,
instead call platform_get_irq for all the interrupts and store them
in an array for later use.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
---
Tested for GPIO Interrupts on da850-lcdk board.
Changes in v3:
* Changed irqs type from unsigned to int
Changes in v2:
* Extended the logic of using saved IRQs to unbanked IRQs
as per Grygorii's suggestion.
drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++-----------
include/linux/platform_data/gpio-davinci.h | 3 +-
2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
index 0ff2c0d..a80eb01 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ static inline struct davinci_gpio_regs __iomem *irq2regs(struct irq_data *d)
return g;
}
-static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev, int bank_irq);
+static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev);
/*--------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
@@ -167,8 +167,8 @@ static int davinci_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
static int davinci_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
static int ctrl_num, bank_base;
- int gpio, bank, bank_irq, ret = 0;
- unsigned ngpio, nbank;
+ int gpio, bank, i, ret = 0;
+ unsigned int ngpio, nbank, nirq;
struct davinci_gpio_controller *chips;
struct davinci_gpio_platform_data *pdata;
struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
@@ -197,6 +197,16 @@ static int davinci_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (WARN_ON(ARCH_NR_GPIOS < ngpio))
ngpio = ARCH_NR_GPIOS;
+ /*
+ * If there are unbanked interrupts then the number of
+ * interrupts is equal to number of gpios else all are banked so
+ * number of interrupts is equal to number of banks(each with 16 gpios)
+ */
+ if (pdata->gpio_unbanked)
+ nirq = pdata->gpio_unbanked;
+ else
+ nirq = DIV_ROUND_UP(ngpio, 16);
+
nbank = DIV_ROUND_UP(ngpio, 32);
chips = devm_kzalloc(dev,
nbank * sizeof(struct davinci_gpio_controller),
@@ -209,10 +219,13 @@ static int davinci_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (IS_ERR(gpio_base))
return PTR_ERR(gpio_base);
- bank_irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
- if (bank_irq < 0) {
- dev_dbg(dev, "IRQ not populated\n");
- return bank_irq;
+ for (i = 0; i < nirq; i++) {
+ chips->irqs[i] = platform_get_irq(pdev, i);
+ if (chips->irqs[i] < 0) {
+ dev_info(dev, "IRQ not populated, err = %d\n",
+ chips->irqs[i]);
+ return chips->irqs[i];
+ }
}
snprintf(label, MAX_LABEL_SIZE, "davinci_gpio.%d", ctrl_num++);
@@ -249,7 +262,7 @@ static int davinci_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
goto err;
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, chips);
- ret = davinci_gpio_irq_setup(pdev, bank_irq);
+ ret = davinci_gpio_irq_setup(pdev);
if (ret)
goto err;
@@ -383,7 +396,7 @@ static int gpio_to_irq_unbanked(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
* can provide direct-mapped IRQs to AINTC (up to 32 GPIOs).
*/
if (offset < d->gpio_unbanked)
- return d->base_irq + offset;
+ return d->irqs[offset];
else
return -ENODEV;
}
@@ -396,7 +409,7 @@ static int gpio_irq_type_unbanked(struct irq_data *data, unsigned trigger)
d = (struct davinci_gpio_controller *)irq_data_get_irq_handler_data(data);
g = (struct davinci_gpio_regs __iomem *)d->regs[0];
- mask = __gpio_mask(data->irq - d->base_irq);
+ mask = __gpio_mask(data->irq - d->irqs[0]);
if (trigger & ~(IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING | IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING))
return -EINVAL;
@@ -458,7 +471,7 @@ static struct irq_chip *keystone_gpio_get_irq_chip(unsigned int irq)
* (dm6446) can be set appropriately for GPIOV33 pins.
*/
-static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev, int bank_irq)
+static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
unsigned gpio, bank;
int irq;
@@ -492,6 +505,7 @@ static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev, int bank_irq)
dev_err(dev, "Error %ld getting gpio clock\n", PTR_ERR(clk));
return PTR_ERR(clk);
}
+
ret = clk_prepare_enable(clk);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -531,12 +545,11 @@ static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev, int bank_irq)
if (pdata->gpio_unbanked) {
/* pass "bank 0" GPIO IRQs to AINTC */
chips->chip.to_irq = gpio_to_irq_unbanked;
- chips->base_irq = bank_irq;
chips->gpio_unbanked = pdata->gpio_unbanked;
binten = GENMASK(pdata->gpio_unbanked / 16, 0);
/* AINTC handles mask/unmask; GPIO handles triggering */
- irq = bank_irq;
+ irq = chips->irqs[0];
irq_chip = gpio_get_irq_chip(irq);
irq_chip->name = "GPIO-AINTC";
irq_chip->irq_set_type = gpio_irq_type_unbanked;
@@ -547,10 +560,11 @@ static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev, int bank_irq)
writel_relaxed(~0, &g->set_rising);
/* set the direct IRQs up to use that irqchip */
- for (gpio = 0; gpio < pdata->gpio_unbanked; gpio++, irq++) {
- irq_set_chip(irq, irq_chip);
- irq_set_handler_data(irq, chips);
- irq_set_status_flags(irq, IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH);
+ for (gpio = 0; gpio < pdata->gpio_unbanked; gpio++) {
+ irq_set_chip(chips->irqs[gpio], irq_chip);
+ irq_set_handler_data(chips->irqs[gpio], chips);
+ irq_set_status_flags(chips->irqs[gpio],
+ IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH);
}
goto done;
@@ -560,7 +574,7 @@ static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev, int bank_irq)
* Or, AINTC can handle IRQs for banks of 16 GPIO IRQs, which we
* then chain through our own handler.
*/
- for (gpio = 0, bank = 0; gpio < ngpio; bank++, bank_irq++, gpio += 16) {
+ for (gpio = 0, bank = 0; gpio < ngpio; bank++, gpio += 16) {
/* disabled by default, enabled only as needed
* There are register sets for 32 GPIOs. 2 banks of 16
* GPIOs are covered by each set of registers hence divide by 2
@@ -587,8 +601,8 @@ static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev, int bank_irq)
irqdata->bank_num = bank;
irqdata->chip = chips;
- irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(bank_irq, gpio_irq_handler,
- irqdata);
+ irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(chips->irqs[bank],
+ gpio_irq_handler, irqdata);
binten |= BIT(bank);
}
diff --git a/include/linux/platform_data/gpio-davinci.h b/include/linux/platform_data/gpio-davinci.h
index 90ae19c..57a5a35 100644
--- a/include/linux/platform_data/gpio-davinci.h
+++ b/include/linux/platform_data/gpio-davinci.h
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
#include <asm-generic/gpio.h>
#define MAX_REGS_BANKS 5
+#define MAX_INT_PER_BANK 32
struct davinci_gpio_platform_data {
u32 ngpio;
@@ -41,7 +42,7 @@ struct davinci_gpio_controller {
spinlock_t lock;
void __iomem *regs[MAX_REGS_BANKS];
int gpio_unbanked;
- unsigned int base_irq;
+ int irqs[MAX_INT_PER_BANK];
unsigned int base;
};
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] gpio: davinci: Do not assume continuous IRQ numbering
2018-06-12 7:59 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] gpio: davinci: Do not assume continuous IRQ numbering Keerthy
@ 2018-06-12 20:06 ` Grygorii Strashko
2018-06-13 1:06 ` J, KEERTHY
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Grygorii Strashko @ 2018-06-12 20:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Keerthy, linus.walleij; +Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, t-kristo
On 06/12/2018 02:59 AM, Keerthy wrote:
> Currently the driver assumes that the interrupts are continuous
> and does platform_get_irq only once and assumes the rest are continuous,
> instead call platform_get_irq for all the interrupts and store them
> in an array for later use.
>
> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
> ---
>
> Tested for GPIO Interrupts on da850-lcdk board.
>
> Changes in v3:
>
> * Changed irqs type from unsigned to int
>
> Changes in v2:
>
> * Extended the logic of using saved IRQs to unbanked IRQs
> as per Grygorii's suggestion.
>
> drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++-----------
> include/linux/platform_data/gpio-davinci.h | 3 +-
> 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
[...]
>
> @@ -383,7 +396,7 @@ static int gpio_to_irq_unbanked(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
> * can provide direct-mapped IRQs to AINTC (up to 32 GPIOs).
> */
> if (offset < d->gpio_unbanked)
> - return d->base_irq + offset;
> + return d->irqs[offset];
this one seems right
> else
> return -ENODEV;
> }
> @@ -396,7 +409,7 @@ static int gpio_irq_type_unbanked(struct irq_data *data, unsigned trigger)
>
> d = (struct davinci_gpio_controller *)irq_data_get_irq_handler_data(data);
> g = (struct davinci_gpio_regs __iomem *)d->regs[0];
> - mask = __gpio_mask(data->irq - d->base_irq);
> + mask = __gpio_mask(data->irq - d->irqs[0]);
but this one is not. You can't do "base + offset" or "irq - base" ops
if Irqs range is not sequential. So, in my opinion, here you need to
convert irq to gpio bank offset (hwirq value in irq_data is not offset
- gic specific value) which means - walk through d->irqs[x] and find
item with d->irqs[x] == irq which will give gpio bank offset.
Than offset can be used to build mask.
>
> if (trigger & ~(IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING | IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING))
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -458,7 +471,7 @@ static struct irq_chip *keystone_gpio_get_irq_chip(unsigned int irq)
> * (dm6446) can be set appropriately for GPIOV33 pins.
> */
>
> -static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev, int bank_irq)
[...]
> #include <asm-generic/gpio.h>
>
> #define MAX_REGS_BANKS 5
> +#define MAX_INT_PER_BANK 32
>
> struct davinci_gpio_platform_data {
> u32 ngpio;
> @@ -41,7 +42,7 @@ struct davinci_gpio_controller {
> spinlock_t lock;
> void __iomem *regs[MAX_REGS_BANKS];
> int gpio_unbanked;
> - unsigned int base_irq;
> + int irqs[MAX_INT_PER_BANK];
> unsigned int base;
> };
>
>
--
regards,
-grygorii
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] gpio: davinci: Do not assume continuous IRQ numbering
2018-06-12 20:06 ` Grygorii Strashko
@ 2018-06-13 1:06 ` J, KEERTHY
2018-06-13 1:18 ` J, KEERTHY
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: J, KEERTHY @ 2018-06-13 1:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Grygorii Strashko, linus.walleij; +Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, t-kristo
On 6/13/2018 1:36 AM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>
>
> On 06/12/2018 02:59 AM, Keerthy wrote:
>> Currently the driver assumes that the interrupts are continuous
>> and does platform_get_irq only once and assumes the rest are continuous,
>> instead call platform_get_irq for all the interrupts and store them
>> in an array for later use.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Tested for GPIO Interrupts on da850-lcdk board.
>>
>> Changes in v3:
>>
>> * Changed irqs type from unsigned to int
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>>
>> * Extended the logic of using saved IRQs to unbanked IRQs
>> as per Grygorii's suggestion.
>>
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++-----------
>> include/linux/platform_data/gpio-davinci.h | 3 +-
>> 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>
>
> [...]
>
>>
>> @@ -383,7 +396,7 @@ static int gpio_to_irq_unbanked(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
>> * can provide direct-mapped IRQs to AINTC (up to 32 GPIOs).
>> */
>> if (offset < d->gpio_unbanked)
>> - return d->base_irq + offset;
>> + return d->irqs[offset];
>
> this one seems right
>
>> else
>> return -ENODEV;
>> }
>> @@ -396,7 +409,7 @@ static int gpio_irq_type_unbanked(struct irq_data *data, unsigned trigger)
>>
>> d = (struct davinci_gpio_controller *)irq_data_get_irq_handler_data(data);
>> g = (struct davinci_gpio_regs __iomem *)d->regs[0];
>> - mask = __gpio_mask(data->irq - d->base_irq);
>> + mask = __gpio_mask(data->irq - d->irqs[0]);
>
> but this one is not. You can't do "base + offset" or "irq - base" ops
> if Irqs range is not sequential. So, in my opinion, here you need to
> convert irq to gpio bank offset (hwirq value in irq_data is not offset
> - gic specific value) which means - walk through d->irqs[x] and find
> item with d->irqs[x] == irq which will give gpio bank offset.
> Than offset can be used to build mask.
Agreed.
>
>>
>> if (trigger & ~(IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING | IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING))
>> return -EINVAL;
>> @@ -458,7 +471,7 @@ static struct irq_chip *keystone_gpio_get_irq_chip(unsigned int irq)
>> * (dm6446) can be set appropriately for GPIOV33 pins.
>> */
>>
>> -static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev, int bank_irq)
>
>
> [...]
>
>> #include <asm-generic/gpio.h>
>>
>> #define MAX_REGS_BANKS 5
>> +#define MAX_INT_PER_BANK 32
>>
>> struct davinci_gpio_platform_data {
>> u32 ngpio;
>> @@ -41,7 +42,7 @@ struct davinci_gpio_controller {
>> spinlock_t lock;
>> void __iomem *regs[MAX_REGS_BANKS];
>> int gpio_unbanked;
>> - unsigned int base_irq;
>> + int irqs[MAX_INT_PER_BANK];
>> unsigned int base;
>> };
>>
>>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] gpio: davinci: Do not assume continuous IRQ numbering
2018-06-13 1:06 ` J, KEERTHY
@ 2018-06-13 1:18 ` J, KEERTHY
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: J, KEERTHY @ 2018-06-13 1:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Grygorii Strashko, linus.walleij; +Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, t-kristo
On 6/13/2018 6:36 AM, J, KEERTHY wrote:
>
>
> On 6/13/2018 1:36 AM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 06/12/2018 02:59 AM, Keerthy wrote:
>>> Currently the driver assumes that the interrupts are continuous
>>> and does platform_get_irq only once and assumes the rest are continuous,
>>> instead call platform_get_irq for all the interrupts and store them
>>> in an array for later use.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Tested for GPIO Interrupts on da850-lcdk board.
>>>
>>> Changes in v3:
>>>
>>> * Changed irqs type from unsigned to int
>>>
>>> Changes in v2:
>>>
>>> * Extended the logic of using saved IRQs to unbanked IRQs
>>> as per Grygorii's suggestion.
>>>
>>> drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c | 54
>>> +++++++++++++++++++-----------
>>> include/linux/platform_data/gpio-davinci.h | 3 +-
>>> 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>>
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> @@ -383,7 +396,7 @@ static int gpio_to_irq_unbanked(struct gpio_chip
>>> *chip, unsigned offset)
>>> * can provide direct-mapped IRQs to AINTC (up to 32 GPIOs).
>>> */
>>> if (offset < d->gpio_unbanked)
>>> - return d->base_irq + offset;
>>> + return d->irqs[offset];
>>
>> this one seems right
>>
>>> else
>>> return -ENODEV;
>>> }
>>> @@ -396,7 +409,7 @@ static int gpio_irq_type_unbanked(struct irq_data
>>> *data, unsigned trigger)
>>> d = (struct davinci_gpio_controller
>>> *)irq_data_get_irq_handler_data(data);
>>> g = (struct davinci_gpio_regs __iomem *)d->regs[0];
>>> - mask = __gpio_mask(data->irq - d->base_irq);
>>> + mask = __gpio_mask(data->irq - d->irqs[0]);
>>
>> but this one is not. You can't do "base + offset" or "irq - base" ops
>> if Irqs range is not sequential. So, in my opinion, here you need to
>> convert irq to gpio bank offset (hwirq value in irq_data is not offset
>> - gic specific value) which means - walk through d->irqs[x] and find
>> item with d->irqs[x] == irq which will give gpio bank offset.
>> Than offset can be used to build mask.
>
> Agreed.
- mask = __gpio_mask(data->irq - d->base_irq);
+ for (i = 0; i < MAX_INT_PER_BANK; i++)
+ if (data->irq == d->irqs[i])
+ break;
+
+ if (i == MAX_INT_PER_BANK)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ mask = __gpio_mask(i);
I believe the above snippet works for non-sequential IRQs.
>
>>
>>> if (trigger & ~(IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING | IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING))
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>> @@ -458,7 +471,7 @@ static struct irq_chip
>>> *keystone_gpio_get_irq_chip(unsigned int irq)
>>> * (dm6446) can be set appropriately for GPIOV33 pins.
>>> */
>>> -static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev, int
>>> bank_irq)
>>
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> #include <asm-generic/gpio.h>
>>> #define MAX_REGS_BANKS 5
>>> +#define MAX_INT_PER_BANK 32
>>> struct davinci_gpio_platform_data {
>>> u32 ngpio;
>>> @@ -41,7 +42,7 @@ struct davinci_gpio_controller {
>>> spinlock_t lock;
>>> void __iomem *regs[MAX_REGS_BANKS];
>>> int gpio_unbanked;
>>> - unsigned int base_irq;
>>> + int irqs[MAX_INT_PER_BANK];
>>> unsigned int base;
>>> };
>>>
>>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-06-13 1:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-06-12 7:59 [PATCH v3 1/2] gpio: davinci: Shuffle IRQ resource fetching from DT to beginning of probe Keerthy
2018-06-12 7:59 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] gpio: davinci: Do not assume continuous IRQ numbering Keerthy
2018-06-12 20:06 ` Grygorii Strashko
2018-06-13 1:06 ` J, KEERTHY
2018-06-13 1:18 ` J, KEERTHY
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®