From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Hoo-fscking-ray - (was Re: 2.6.25-rc3-mm1 - BUG at system shutdown time
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 23:11:18 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3370.1206155478@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 21 Mar 2008 21:12:11 BST." <20080321201211.GA21609@elte.hu>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2121 bytes --]
On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 21:12:11 BST, Ingo Molnar said:
>
> * Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 20:58:13 BST, Ingo Molnar said:
> >
> > > no, we frequently regenerate the x86.git tree so the dates have little
> > > relevance. If for any particular pull, x86/base is good and x86/latest
> > > is bad, then the bug is somewhere in those 200-300 patches inbetween.
> > > They are lined up linearly so should be perfectly bisectable.
> >
> > OK, off to go try the last few bisects then...
>
> well ... your git bisection log does look suspiciously 'good', so
> something is wrong thee i think :-(
>
> the chance to get 8 'good' bisection points in a row is 1:256. OTOH, the
> freshest x86 patches are always at the 'end' of the queue - which are
> also the ones most likely to break anything.
On the other hand, this was broken in 25-rc3-mm1, so it's not a "fresh"
patch...
> Are you sure the x86/base point is indeed 'good'? You can check it via:
>
> git-checkout -b tmp x86/base
>
> and build+boot it.
Did that, and it's good (as in 'shutdown -h now' powers off rather than BUG and
hanging).
"You're at Witt's End" -- Adventure, c. 1978
OK.. so far I've got:
25-rc3-mm1 is bad
25-rc5-mm1 is bad, and bisected down to git-x86.patch
x86/base as pulled last week is good
bisected to within the last 9 entries of x86/latest is good.
So I can't seem to replicate it using the git-x86 tree, but bisecting -mm
implicates it. How very strange.
I even went and pulled Andrew's mmotm pile as of this afternoon, and got that
to built after having to heave only a dozen patches over the side and one or
two hand-fixes of patches - and *that* one is good too.
So I'm thinking that it was some "bump in the night" that was broken in the
x86 tree when Andrew pulled it for 25-rc5-mm1, but was fixed by the time I
pulled it a few days later to start git-bisecting it.
Given that -mmotm isn't showing the problem, I'm having a hard time coming
up with enthusiasm to keep chasing it. If I see it happen again in a -mm
or Linus kernel, I'll restart the chase then....
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 226 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-22 3:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-04 9:19 2.6.25-rc3-mm1 Andrew Morton
2008-03-04 11:59 ` 2.6.25-rc3-mm1 Cornelia Huck
2008-03-04 19:35 ` 2.6.25-rc3-mm1 Greg KH
2008-03-04 13:12 ` [BUG] 2.6.25-rc3-mm1 kernel panic while bootup on powerpc () Kamalesh Babulal
2008-03-04 14:40 ` Michael Neuling
2008-03-04 18:33 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-05 8:23 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-03-06 0:03 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-03-06 0:44 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-06 0:52 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-03-04 18:36 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-04 18:47 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-03-04 19:18 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-03-05 8:22 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-03-04 16:35 ` 2.6.25-rc3-mm1 (IDE) Randy Dunlap
2008-03-06 21:14 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-03-04 16:45 ` 2.6.25-rc3-mm1 (CCISS) Randy Dunlap
2008-03-04 17:02 ` Miller, Mike (OS Dev)
2008-03-04 17:14 ` Randy Dunlap
2008-03-04 18:14 ` Jens Axboe
2008-03-04 19:12 ` [PATCH 2.6.25-rc3-mm1] fix ext2 borkage Hugh Dickins
2008-03-04 19:20 ` [BUG] 2.6.25-rc3-mm1 kernel bug while running libhugetlbfs Kamalesh Babulal
2008-03-04 19:51 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-04 22:01 ` Adam Litke
2008-03-05 7:52 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-03-04 20:24 ` 2.6.25-rc3-mm1 (wakeup) Randy Dunlap
2008-03-04 22:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-03-05 7:40 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-03-04 21:26 ` 2.6.25-rc3-mm1 (9p docs) Randy Dunlap
2008-03-04 21:43 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2008-03-05 7:21 ` 2.6.25-rc3-mm1 - PROFILE_LIKELY redux Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-03-05 17:45 ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-05 18:02 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-05 18:22 ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-05 22:26 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-03-05 23:49 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-05 19:59 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-03-05 21:56 ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-05 10:51 ` prctl(0x8) -> EINVAL [Was: 2.6.25-rc3-mm1] Jiri Slaby
2008-03-05 10:59 ` Jiri Slaby
2008-03-05 14:06 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-03-05 15:18 ` Jiri Slaby
2008-03-09 16:28 ` Andrew Morgan
2008-03-05 13:04 ` 2.6.25-rc3-mm1 Pavel Emelyanov
2008-03-05 13:12 ` 2.6.25-rc3-mm1 (SYSFS=n breaks module engine) Pavel Emelyanov
2008-03-05 13:31 ` 2.6.25-rc3-mm1 Kay Sievers
2008-03-05 13:38 ` 2.6.25-rc3-mm1 Pavel Emelyanov
2008-03-05 13:54 ` 2.6.25-rc3-mm1 Kay Sievers
2008-03-05 14:28 ` 2.6.25-rc3-mm1 Pavel Emelyanov
2008-03-05 16:40 ` 2.6.25-rc3-mm1 Greg KH
2008-03-05 16:59 ` 2.6.25-rc3-mm1 Pavel Emelyanov
2008-03-05 17:07 ` 2.6.25-rc3-mm1 Greg KH
2008-03-05 21:34 ` 2.6.25-rc3-mm1 ppc64 boot hang Badari Pulavarty
2008-03-05 21:54 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-05 22:35 ` Badari Pulavarty
2008-03-05 23:17 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-03-07 3:58 ` 2.6.25-rc3-mm1 - BUG at system shutdown time Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-03-07 6:16 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-07 7:52 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-03-07 8:06 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-03-07 8:23 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-03-07 8:34 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-03-07 19:30 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-03-12 7:32 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-13 2:19 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-03-13 2:32 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-13 3:57 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-03-13 4:27 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-14 18:50 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-03-21 13:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-21 19:38 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-03-21 19:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-21 20:05 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-03-21 20:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-22 3:11 ` Valdis.Kletnieks [this message]
2008-03-22 12:09 ` Hoo-fscking-ray - (was " Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3370.1206155478@turing-police.cc.vt.edu \
--to=valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome