Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] cpupower: Recognise amd-pstate active mode driver

[Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>]

On 6/16/23 07:06, Wyes Karny wrote:
> amd-pstate active mode driver name is "amd-pstate-epp".  Add this to the
> string matching condition to recognise amd-pstate active mode driver.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wyes Karny <wyes.karny@amd.com>
> ---
>   tools/power/cpupower/utils/helpers/misc.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/power/cpupower/utils/helpers/misc.c b/tools/power/cpupower/utils/helpers/misc.c
> index 9547b29254a7..21f653cd472c 100644
> --- a/tools/power/cpupower/utils/helpers/misc.c
> +++ b/tools/power/cpupower/utils/helpers/misc.c
> @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ bool cpupower_amd_pstate_enabled(void)
>   	if (!driver)
>   		return ret;
>   
> -	if (!strcmp(driver, "amd-pstate"))
> +	if (!strcmp(driver, "amd-pstate") || !strcmp(driver, "amd-pstate-epp"))

To avoid getting caught in the case that a kernel didn't have the patch 
separated from this series (for example if a distro missed it in a 
backport from separate directories), how about using strncmp() instead 
and just look for the prefix?

This would also let the tool be more future proofed in the case another 
amd-pstate driver was introduced later down the road as long as it stuck 
to "amd-pstate*"

>   		ret = true;
>   
>   	cpufreq_put_driver(driver);