Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] cpupower: Recognise amd-pstate active mode driver

["Limonciello, Mario" <mario.limonciello@amd.com>]

On 6/19/2023 12:31 PM, Wyes Karny wrote:
> Hi Mario,
>
> On 18 Jun 20:58, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>> On 6/16/23 07:06, Wyes Karny wrote:
>>> amd-pstate active mode driver name is "amd-pstate-epp".  Add this to the
>>> string matching condition to recognise amd-pstate active mode driver.
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Wyes Karny <wyes.karny@amd.com>
>>> ---
>>>    tools/power/cpupower/utils/helpers/misc.c | 2 +-
>>>    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tools/power/cpupower/utils/helpers/misc.c b/tools/power/cpupower/utils/helpers/misc.c
>>> index 9547b29254a7..21f653cd472c 100644
>>> --- a/tools/power/cpupower/utils/helpers/misc.c
>>> +++ b/tools/power/cpupower/utils/helpers/misc.c
>>> @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ bool cpupower_amd_pstate_enabled(void)
>>>    	if (!driver)
>>>    		return ret;
>>> -	if (!strcmp(driver, "amd-pstate"))
>>> +	if (!strcmp(driver, "amd-pstate") || !strcmp(driver, "amd-pstate-epp"))
>> To avoid getting caught in the case that a kernel didn't have the patch
>> separated from this series (for example if a distro missed it in a backport
>> from separate directories), how about using strncmp() instead and just look
>> for the prefix?
> Sure, I'll update the patch.
> I'm thinking of using strncmp(driver, "amd", 3), because in the above
> case the epp driver would be "amd_pstate_epp" therefore common prefix is
> only "amd".
>
> Thanks,
> Wyes
Sounds good, thanks!
>> This would also let the tool be more future proofed in the case another
>> amd-pstate driver was introduced later down the road as long as it stuck to
>> "amd-pstate*"
>>
>>>    		ret = true;
>>>    	cpufreq_put_driver(driver);