From: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
To: x86@kernel.org, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 7/8] ACPI: acpi_idle: touch TS_POLLING only in the non-MWAIT case
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 22:42:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <34959ffadbffe1eaedcf5cc677916b2f7313dc4e.1274926772.git.len.brown@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1274928151-30919-1-git-send-email-lenb@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <e099975ca65a7f6ac7f8bc3fee84d3e03893aa31.1274926772.git.len.brown@intel.com>
From: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
commit d306ebc28649b89877a22158fe0076f06cc46f60
(ACPI: Be in TS_POLLING state during mwait based C-state entry)
fixed an important power & performance issue where ACPI c2 and c3 C-states
were clearing TS_POLLING even when using MWAIT (ACPI_STATE_FFH).
That bug had been causing us to receive redundant scheduling interrups
when we had already been woken up by MONITOR/MWAIT.
Following up on that...
In the MWAIT case, we don't have to subsequently
check need_resched(), as that c heck was there
for the TS_POLLING-clearing case.
Note that not only does the cpuidle calling function
already check need_resched() before calling us, the
low-level entry into monitor/mwait calls it twice --
guaranteeing that a write to the trigger address
can not go un-noticed.
Also, in this case, we don't have to set TS_POLLING
when we wake, because we never cleared it.
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Cc: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>
---
drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++------------
1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
index 5939e7f..a4166e2 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
@@ -881,6 +881,7 @@ static int acpi_idle_enter_simple(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
return(acpi_idle_enter_c1(dev, state));
local_irq_disable();
+
if (cx->entry_method != ACPI_CSTATE_FFH) {
current_thread_info()->status &= ~TS_POLLING;
/*
@@ -888,12 +889,12 @@ static int acpi_idle_enter_simple(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
* NEED_RESCHED:
*/
smp_mb();
- }
- if (unlikely(need_resched())) {
- current_thread_info()->status |= TS_POLLING;
- local_irq_enable();
- return 0;
+ if (unlikely(need_resched())) {
+ current_thread_info()->status |= TS_POLLING;
+ local_irq_enable();
+ return 0;
+ }
}
/*
@@ -918,7 +919,8 @@ static int acpi_idle_enter_simple(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
sched_clock_idle_wakeup_event(sleep_ticks*PM_TIMER_TICK_NS);
local_irq_enable();
- current_thread_info()->status |= TS_POLLING;
+ if (cx->entry_method != ACPI_CSTATE_FFH)
+ current_thread_info()->status |= TS_POLLING;
cx->usage++;
@@ -968,6 +970,7 @@ static int acpi_idle_enter_bm(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
}
local_irq_disable();
+
if (cx->entry_method != ACPI_CSTATE_FFH) {
current_thread_info()->status &= ~TS_POLLING;
/*
@@ -975,12 +978,12 @@ static int acpi_idle_enter_bm(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
* NEED_RESCHED:
*/
smp_mb();
- }
- if (unlikely(need_resched())) {
- current_thread_info()->status |= TS_POLLING;
- local_irq_enable();
- return 0;
+ if (unlikely(need_resched())) {
+ current_thread_info()->status |= TS_POLLING;
+ local_irq_enable();
+ return 0;
+ }
}
acpi_unlazy_tlb(smp_processor_id());
@@ -1032,7 +1035,8 @@ static int acpi_idle_enter_bm(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
sched_clock_idle_wakeup_event(sleep_ticks*PM_TIMER_TICK_NS);
local_irq_enable();
- current_thread_info()->status |= TS_POLLING;
+ if (cx->entry_method != ACPI_CSTATE_FFH)
+ current_thread_info()->status |= TS_POLLING;
cx->usage++;
--
1.6.0.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-27 2:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-27 2:42 idle-test patches queued for upstream Len Brown
2010-05-27 2:42 ` [PATCH 1/8] cpuidle: fail to register if !CONFIG_CPU_IDLE Len Brown
2010-05-27 2:42 ` [PATCH 2/8] cpuidle: add cpuidle_unregister_driver() error check Len Brown
2010-05-27 3:14 ` Andrew Morton
2010-05-27 5:11 ` [PATCH-v2 " Len Brown
2010-05-27 5:13 ` Andrew Morton
2010-05-27 2:42 ` [PATCH 3/8] cpuidle: make cpuidle_curr_driver static Len Brown
2010-05-27 5:27 ` [PATCH-v2 " Len Brown
2010-05-27 18:40 ` Luck, Tony
2010-05-27 23:30 ` Len Brown
2010-05-27 2:42 ` [PATCH 4/8] ACPI: allow a native cpuidle driver to displace ACPI Len Brown
2010-05-27 2:42 ` [PATCH 5/8] sched: clarify commment for TS_POLLING Len Brown
2010-05-27 5:53 ` [PATCH-v2 " Len Brown
2010-05-27 2:42 ` [PATCH 6/8] acpi_pad: uses MONITOR/MWAIT, so it doesn't need to clear TS_POLLING Len Brown
2010-05-27 2:42 ` Len Brown [this message]
2010-05-27 2:42 ` [PATCH 8/8] intel_idle: create a native cpuidle driver for select intel processors Len Brown
2010-05-27 3:44 ` Andrew Morton
2010-05-28 3:57 ` Len Brown
2010-05-30 9:20 ` Andi Kleen
2010-05-27 8:53 ` [linux-pm] " Thomas Renninger
2010-05-28 1:44 ` Len Brown
2010-05-28 7:46 ` Thomas Renninger
2010-05-28 17:38 ` Len Brown
2010-05-29 4:17 ` Thomas Renninger
2010-05-27 14:14 ` Kevin Hilman
2010-05-27 14:22 ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-05-27 14:36 ` Kevin Hilman
2010-05-28 0:22 ` Len Brown
2010-05-28 17:28 ` Kevin Hilman
2010-05-27 14:51 ` [linux-pm] " Igor Stoppa
2010-05-28 3:14 ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-05-28 17:27 ` Kevin Hilman
2010-05-29 0:38 ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-05-28 2:32 ` Chase Douglas
2010-05-28 4:16 ` Len Brown
2010-05-28 15:09 ` Chase Douglas
2010-05-28 17:43 ` Len Brown
2010-05-28 19:51 ` Chase Douglas
2010-05-28 20:14 ` Chase Douglas
2010-05-27 5:25 ` (No subject header) Milton Miller
2010-05-27 5:47 ` Len Brown
2010-05-27 8:45 ` [linux-pm] idle-test patches queued for upstream Thomas Renninger
2010-05-28 0:59 ` Len Brown
2010-05-28 8:07 ` Thomas Renninger
2010-05-28 17:42 ` Len Brown
2010-06-16 7:53 ` Pavel Machek
2010-05-28 6:01 idle patches for 2.6.35 Len Brown
2010-05-28 6:01 ` [PATCH 1/8] cpuidle: fail to register if !CONFIG_CPU_IDLE Len Brown
2010-05-28 6:02 ` [PATCH 7/8] ACPI: acpi_idle: touch TS_POLLING only in the non-MWAIT case Len Brown
2010-05-28 16:19 ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2010-05-28 17:59 ` Len Brown
2010-05-28 21:24 ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=34959ffadbffe1eaedcf5cc677916b2f7313dc4e.1274926772.git.len.brown@intel.com \
--to=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=venki@google.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome