From: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
To: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 7/8] ACPI: acpi_idle: touch TS_POLLING only in the non-MWAIT case
Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 02:02:00 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c4716a7a5639fd8f82dc6f2046b127e65a3851c5.1275026041.git.len.brown@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1275026521-30835-1-git-send-email-lenb@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <6b2c676bf32be91f43215d5874c07c1becaba013.1275026041.git.len.brown@intel.com>
From: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
commit d306ebc28649b89877a22158fe0076f06cc46f60
(ACPI: Be in TS_POLLING state during mwait based C-state entry)
fixed an important power & performance issue where ACPI c2 and c3 C-states
were clearing TS_POLLING even when using MWAIT (ACPI_STATE_FFH).
That bug had been causing us to receive redundant scheduling interrups
when we had already been woken up by MONITOR/MWAIT.
Following up on that...
In the MWAIT case, we don't have to subsequently
check need_resched(), as that c heck was there
for the TS_POLLING-clearing case.
Note that not only does the cpuidle calling function
already check need_resched() before calling us, the
low-level entry into monitor/mwait calls it twice --
guaranteeing that a write to the trigger address
can not go un-noticed.
Also, in this case, we don't have to set TS_POLLING
when we wake, because we never cleared it.
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Cc: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>
---
drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++------------
1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
index 5939e7f..a4166e2 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
@@ -881,6 +881,7 @@ static int acpi_idle_enter_simple(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
return(acpi_idle_enter_c1(dev, state));
local_irq_disable();
+
if (cx->entry_method != ACPI_CSTATE_FFH) {
current_thread_info()->status &= ~TS_POLLING;
/*
@@ -888,12 +889,12 @@ static int acpi_idle_enter_simple(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
* NEED_RESCHED:
*/
smp_mb();
- }
- if (unlikely(need_resched())) {
- current_thread_info()->status |= TS_POLLING;
- local_irq_enable();
- return 0;
+ if (unlikely(need_resched())) {
+ current_thread_info()->status |= TS_POLLING;
+ local_irq_enable();
+ return 0;
+ }
}
/*
@@ -918,7 +919,8 @@ static int acpi_idle_enter_simple(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
sched_clock_idle_wakeup_event(sleep_ticks*PM_TIMER_TICK_NS);
local_irq_enable();
- current_thread_info()->status |= TS_POLLING;
+ if (cx->entry_method != ACPI_CSTATE_FFH)
+ current_thread_info()->status |= TS_POLLING;
cx->usage++;
@@ -968,6 +970,7 @@ static int acpi_idle_enter_bm(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
}
local_irq_disable();
+
if (cx->entry_method != ACPI_CSTATE_FFH) {
current_thread_info()->status &= ~TS_POLLING;
/*
@@ -975,12 +978,12 @@ static int acpi_idle_enter_bm(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
* NEED_RESCHED:
*/
smp_mb();
- }
- if (unlikely(need_resched())) {
- current_thread_info()->status |= TS_POLLING;
- local_irq_enable();
- return 0;
+ if (unlikely(need_resched())) {
+ current_thread_info()->status |= TS_POLLING;
+ local_irq_enable();
+ return 0;
+ }
}
acpi_unlazy_tlb(smp_processor_id());
@@ -1032,7 +1035,8 @@ static int acpi_idle_enter_bm(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
sched_clock_idle_wakeup_event(sleep_ticks*PM_TIMER_TICK_NS);
local_irq_enable();
- current_thread_info()->status |= TS_POLLING;
+ if (cx->entry_method != ACPI_CSTATE_FFH)
+ current_thread_info()->status |= TS_POLLING;
cx->usage++;
--
1.6.0.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-28 6:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-28 6:01 idle patches for 2.6.35 Len Brown
2010-05-28 6:01 ` [PATCH 1/8] cpuidle: fail to register if !CONFIG_CPU_IDLE Len Brown
2010-05-28 6:01 ` [PATCH 2/8] cpuidle: add cpuidle_unregister_driver() error check Len Brown
2010-05-28 6:01 ` [PATCH 3/8] cpuidle: make cpuidle_curr_driver static Len Brown
2010-05-28 6:01 ` [PATCH 4/8] ACPI: allow a native cpuidle driver to displace ACPI Len Brown
2010-05-28 6:01 ` [PATCH 5/8] sched: clarify commment for TS_POLLING Len Brown
2010-05-28 6:01 ` [PATCH 6/8] acpi_pad: uses MONITOR/MWAIT, so it doesn't need to clear TS_POLLING Len Brown
2010-05-28 6:02 ` Len Brown [this message]
2010-05-28 16:19 ` [PATCH 7/8] ACPI: acpi_idle: touch TS_POLLING only in the non-MWAIT case Venkatesh Pallipadi
2010-05-28 17:59 ` Len Brown
2010-05-28 21:24 ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2010-05-28 6:02 ` [PATCH 8/8] intel_idle: native hardware cpuidle driver for latest Intel processors Len Brown
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-05-27 2:42 idle-test patches queued for upstream Len Brown
2010-05-27 2:42 ` [PATCH 1/8] cpuidle: fail to register if !CONFIG_CPU_IDLE Len Brown
2010-05-27 2:42 ` [PATCH 7/8] ACPI: acpi_idle: touch TS_POLLING only in the non-MWAIT case Len Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c4716a7a5639fd8f82dc6f2046b127e65a3851c5.1275026041.git.len.brown@intel.com \
--to=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=venki@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®