mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] arm64/mm: Drop BUG_ON() from [pmd|pud]_set_huge()
@ 2019-05-27  4:02 Anshuman Khandual
  2019-05-27  6:37 ` Ard Biesheuvel
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Anshuman Khandual @ 2019-05-27  4:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
  Cc: Anshuman Khandual, Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, Mark Rutland

There are no callers for the functions which will pass unaligned physical
addresses. Hence just drop these BUG_ON() checks which are not required.

Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
index 22c2e4f0768f..629011c6238d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
@@ -978,7 +978,6 @@ int pud_set_huge(pud_t *pudp, phys_addr_t phys, pgprot_t prot)
 				   pud_val(new_pud)))
 		return 0;
 
-	BUG_ON(phys & ~PUD_MASK);
 	set_pud(pudp, new_pud);
 	return 1;
 }
@@ -992,7 +991,6 @@ int pmd_set_huge(pmd_t *pmdp, phys_addr_t phys, pgprot_t prot)
 				   pmd_val(new_pmd)))
 		return 0;
 
-	BUG_ON(phys & ~PMD_MASK);
 	set_pmd(pmdp, new_pmd);
 	return 1;
 }
-- 
2.20.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] arm64/mm: Drop BUG_ON() from [pmd|pud]_set_huge()
  2019-05-27  4:02 [PATCH] arm64/mm: Drop BUG_ON() from [pmd|pud]_set_huge() Anshuman Khandual
@ 2019-05-27  6:37 ` Ard Biesheuvel
  2019-05-27  6:44   ` Anshuman Khandual
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ard Biesheuvel @ 2019-05-27  6:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Anshuman Khandual
  Cc: linux-arm-kernel, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Mark Rutland,
	Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon

On Mon, 27 May 2019 at 06:02, Anshuman Khandual
<anshuman.khandual@arm.com> wrote:
>
> There are no callers for the functions which will pass unaligned physical
> addresses. Hence just drop these BUG_ON() checks which are not required.
>

This might change in the future, right? Should we perhaps switch to
VM_BUG_ON() instead so they get compiled out unless CONFIG_VM_DEBUG is
enabled?

> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> index 22c2e4f0768f..629011c6238d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> @@ -978,7 +978,6 @@ int pud_set_huge(pud_t *pudp, phys_addr_t phys, pgprot_t prot)
>                                    pud_val(new_pud)))
>                 return 0;
>
> -       BUG_ON(phys & ~PUD_MASK);
>         set_pud(pudp, new_pud);
>         return 1;
>  }
> @@ -992,7 +991,6 @@ int pmd_set_huge(pmd_t *pmdp, phys_addr_t phys, pgprot_t prot)
>                                    pmd_val(new_pmd)))
>                 return 0;
>
> -       BUG_ON(phys & ~PMD_MASK);
>         set_pmd(pmdp, new_pmd);
>         return 1;
>  }
> --
> 2.20.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] arm64/mm: Drop BUG_ON() from [pmd|pud]_set_huge()
  2019-05-27  6:37 ` Ard Biesheuvel
@ 2019-05-27  6:44   ` Anshuman Khandual
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Anshuman Khandual @ 2019-05-27  6:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ard Biesheuvel
  Cc: linux-arm-kernel, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Mark Rutland,
	Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon



On 05/27/2019 12:07 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Mon, 27 May 2019 at 06:02, Anshuman Khandual
> <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> wrote:
>> There are no callers for the functions which will pass unaligned physical
>> addresses. Hence just drop these BUG_ON() checks which are not required.
>>
> This might change in the future, right? Should we perhaps switch to
> VM_BUG_ON() instead so they get compiled out unless CONFIG_VM_DEBUG is
> enabled?

Sure we can do that. Will re-send.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-05-27  6:44 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-05-27  4:02 [PATCH] arm64/mm: Drop BUG_ON() from [pmd|pud]_set_huge() Anshuman Khandual
2019-05-27  6:37 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-05-27  6:44   ` Anshuman Khandual

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®