From: Marek Vasut <marex@nabladev.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srini@kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: shared: make the voting mechanism adaptable
Date: Mon, 18 May 2026 21:20:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3612f5f6-eeca-49e5-9662-72729bb48c9f@nabladev.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260513-gpio-shared-dynamic-voting-v1-1-8e1c49961b7d@oss.qualcomm.com>
On 5/13/26 11:13 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> The current voting mechanism in GPIO shared proxy assumes that "low" is
> always the default value and users can only vote for driving the GPIO
> "high" in which case it will remain high as long as there's at least one
> user voting.
>
> This makes it impossible to use the automatic sharing management for
> certain use-cases such as the write-protect GPIOs of EEPROMs which are
> requested "high" and driven "low" to enable writing. In this case, if
> the WP GPIO is shared by multiple EEPROMs, and at least one of them
> wants to enable writing, the pin must be set to "low".
>
> Modify the voting heuristic to assume the value set by the first user on
> request to be the "default" and subseqent calls to gpiod_set_value()
> will constitute votes for a change of the value to the opposite. In the
> wp-gpios case it will mean that the nvmem core requests the GPIO as
> "out-high" for all EEPROMs sharing the pin, and when one of them wants
> to write, the pin will be driven low, enabling it.
Shouldn't this polarity inversion be handled by DT GPIO_ACTIVE_* flag ?
> Fixes: e992d54c6f97 ("gpio: shared-proxy: implement the shared GPIO proxy driver")
> Reported-by: Marek Vasut <marex@nabladev.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260511163518.51104-1-marex@nabladev.com/
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
> Hi Marek!
>
> Please see if you can make your setup work with shared GPIOs with this
> patch. You need to enable CONFIG_HAVE_SHARED_GPIOS on your platform.
Why can this shared GPIO not be enabled generically for any GPIO
controller ?
[...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-19 3:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-13 9:13 Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-05-18 19:20 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2026-05-19 8:20 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-05-19 8:34 ` Linus Walleij
2026-05-19 8:56 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-05-25 8:42 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3612f5f6-eeca-49e5-9662-72729bb48c9f@nabladev.com \
--to=marex@nabladev.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=brgl@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linusw@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=srini@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®