From: Bean Huo <beanhuo@iokpp.de>
To: Stanley Jhu <stanleyjhu@google.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <mkp@kernel.org>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>,
Peter Wang <peter.wang@mediatek.com>,
Brian Kao <powenkao@google.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] scsi: ufs: bsg: Complete the job on error
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2026 20:21:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <361e83f8ae479909597238b4ddf9b3a1e40ef0c2.camel@iokpp.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261015001855.3450573-2-stanleyjhu@google.com>
On Thu, 2026-10-15 at 08:18 +0800, Stanley Jhu wrote:
> index 7a66917b3fc0..18c318d78122 100644
> --- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufs_bsg.c
> +++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufs_bsg.c
> @@ -195,14 +195,12 @@ static int ufs_bsg_request(struct bsg_job *job)
> ufshcd_rpm_put_sync(hba);
> kfree(buff);
> bsg_reply->result = ret;
> - /* complete the job here only if no error */
> - if (ret == 0) {
> + if (ret == 0)
> job->reply_len = rpmb ? sizeof(struct ufs_rpmb_reply) :
> sizeof(struct ufs_bsg_reply);
> - bsg_job_done(job, ret, bsg_reply->reply_payload_rcv_len);
> - }
> + bsg_job_done(job, ret, bsg_reply->reply_payload_rcv_len);
Since the old comment is gone, it's better to add a short one before
bsg_job_done() saying we must always complete the job and return 0?
otherwise a later change could easily bring back either the leak or the double
completion that b13a3539eb2a fixed?
Reviewed-by: Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>
>
> - return ret;
> + return 0;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-18 18:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-15 0:18 [PATCH v2 0/5] scsi: ufs: Fix UIC result byte and BSG request handling Stanley Jhu
2026-10-15 0:18 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] scsi: ufs: bsg: Complete the job on error Stanley Jhu
2026-10-18 18:21 ` Bean Huo [this message]
2026-10-15 0:18 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] scsi: ufs: bsg: Clear the reply buffer before use Stanley Jhu
2026-10-18 18:24 ` Bean Huo
2026-10-15 0:18 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] scsi: ufs: bsg: Validate request_len before accessing request Stanley Jhu
2026-10-15 0:18 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] scsi: ufs: bsg: Reject UIC commands with a non-zero result byte Stanley Jhu
2026-10-18 18:30 ` Bean Huo
2026-10-15 0:18 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] scsi: ufs: core: Clear stale UIC result byte before peer DME retries Stanley Jhu
2026-10-18 18:35 ` Bean Huo
2026-10-15 4:39 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] scsi: ufs: Fix UIC result byte and BSG request handling Peter Wang
2026-10-15 17:53 ` Bart Van Assche
[not found] <sashiko-outbox-172057@kernel.org>
2026-10-15 0:41 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] scsi: ufs: bsg: Complete the job on error Stanley Jhu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=361e83f8ae479909597238b4ddf9b3a1e40ef0c2.camel@iokpp.de \
--to=beanhuo@iokpp.de \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkp@kernel.org \
--cc=peter.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=powenkao@google.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stanleyjhu@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®