From: Bean Huo <beanhuo@iokpp.de>
To: Stanley Jhu <stanleyjhu@google.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <mkp@kernel.org>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>,
Peter Wang <peter.wang@mediatek.com>,
Brian Kao <powenkao@google.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] scsi: ufs: core: Clear stale UIC result byte before peer DME retries
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2026 20:35:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <af3f01fd516c01cd6274541e7be71b155a1593da.camel@iokpp.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261015001855.3450573-6-stanleyjhu@google.com>
On Thu, 2026-10-15 at 08:18 +0800, Stanley Jhu wrote:
> Peer DME get and set retry a failed attempt with the same struct
> uic_command. UIC completion ORs the ConfigResultCode into
> argument2[7:0], and nothing clears it before the next attempt. Once an
> attempt fails, every retry keeps reporting that error code, even when
> the device returns success, so a transient failure becomes a hard
> failure after three retries. Each such retry also triggers the
> WARN_ON_ONCE() in ufshcd_dispatch_uic_cmd(). In ufshcd_dme_set_attr(),
> ufshcd_uic_cmd_compl() also overwrites argument3 with the register
> readback before the next attempt.
>
> Clear the result byte and restore argument3 in ufshcd_dme_set_attr()
> when an attempt fails.
>
> Fixes: 64238fbd15ea ("scsi: ufs: add retries to dme_peer get and set
> attribute")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Reviewed-by: Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stanley Jhu <stanleyjhu@google.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Clear argument2's result byte and restore argument3 (MIBvalue_W) in
> the failure path instead of before the first attempt. Kept Bean's
> Reviewed-by; Bean, please let me know if you would like to look again.
v2 looks good to me, and keeping my reviewed-by is fine
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-18 18:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-15 0:18 [PATCH v2 0/5] scsi: ufs: Fix UIC result byte and BSG request handling Stanley Jhu
2026-10-15 0:18 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] scsi: ufs: bsg: Complete the job on error Stanley Jhu
2026-10-18 18:21 ` Bean Huo
2026-10-15 0:18 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] scsi: ufs: bsg: Clear the reply buffer before use Stanley Jhu
2026-10-18 18:24 ` Bean Huo
2026-10-15 0:18 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] scsi: ufs: bsg: Validate request_len before accessing request Stanley Jhu
2026-10-15 0:18 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] scsi: ufs: bsg: Reject UIC commands with a non-zero result byte Stanley Jhu
2026-10-18 18:30 ` Bean Huo
2026-10-15 0:18 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] scsi: ufs: core: Clear stale UIC result byte before peer DME retries Stanley Jhu
2026-10-18 18:35 ` Bean Huo [this message]
2026-10-15 4:39 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] scsi: ufs: Fix UIC result byte and BSG request handling Peter Wang
2026-10-15 17:53 ` Bart Van Assche
[not found] <sashiko-outbox-172056@kernel.org>
2026-10-15 0:43 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] scsi: ufs: core: Clear stale UIC result byte before peer DME retries Stanley Jhu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=af3f01fd516c01cd6274541e7be71b155a1593da.camel@iokpp.de \
--to=beanhuo@iokpp.de \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkp@kernel.org \
--cc=peter.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=powenkao@google.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stanleyjhu@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®