From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
To: Anoob Soman <anoob.soman@citrix.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jgross@suse.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen-evtchn: Bind dyn evtchn:qemu-dm interrupt to next online VCPU
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 12:24:40 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <363cb97a-7dc1-ae4f-da93-30e7658cef00@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1496414988-12878-1-git-send-email-anoob.soman@citrix.com>
>
> static int set_affinity_irq(struct irq_data *data, const struct cpumask *dest,
> bool force)
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/evtchn.c b/drivers/xen/evtchn.c
> index 10f1ef5..1192f24 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/evtchn.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/evtchn.c
> @@ -58,6 +58,8 @@
> #include <xen/xen-ops.h>
> #include <asm/xen/hypervisor.h>
>
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, bind_last_selected_cpu);
This should be moved into evtchn_bind_interdom_next_vcpu() since that's
the only place referencing it.
Why is it a percpu variable BTW? Wouldn't making it global result in
better interrupt distribution?
> +
> struct per_user_data {
> struct mutex bind_mutex; /* serialize bind/unbind operations */
> struct rb_root evtchns;
> @@ -421,6 +423,36 @@ static void evtchn_unbind_from_user(struct per_user_data *u,
> del_evtchn(u, evtchn);
> }
>
> +static void evtchn_bind_interdom_next_vcpu(int evtchn)
> +{
> + unsigned int selected_cpu, irq;
> + struct irq_desc *desc = NULL;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + irq = irq_from_evtchn(evtchn);
> + desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
> +
> + if (!desc)
> + return;
> +
> + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags);
> + selected_cpu = this_cpu_read(bind_last_selected_cpu);
> + selected_cpu = cpumask_next_and(selected_cpu,
> + desc->irq_common_data.affinity, cpu_online_mask);
> +
> + if (unlikely(selected_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids))
> + selected_cpu = cpumask_first_and(desc->irq_common_data.affinity,
> + cpu_online_mask);
> +
> + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
I think if you follow Juergen's suggestion of wrapping everything into
irq_enable/disable you can drop the lock altogether (assuming you keep
bind_last_selected_cpu percpu).
-boris
> + this_cpu_write(bind_last_selected_cpu, selected_cpu);
> +
> + local_irq_disable();
> + /* unmask expects irqs to be disabled */
> + xen_rebind_evtchn_to_cpu(evtchn, selected_cpu);
> + local_irq_enable();
> +}
> +
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-02 16:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-02 14:49 Anoob Soman
2017-06-02 15:10 ` Juergen Gross
2017-06-05 9:54 ` Anoob Soman
2017-06-02 16:24 ` Boris Ostrovsky [this message]
2017-06-05 10:14 ` Anoob Soman
2017-06-05 14:10 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-06-05 14:49 ` [Xen-devel] " Anoob Soman
2017-06-05 15:32 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-06-05 16:14 ` Anoob Soman
2017-06-05 16:46 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-06-05 17:13 ` Anoob Soman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=363cb97a-7dc1-ae4f-da93-30e7658cef00@oracle.com \
--to=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=anoob.soman@citrix.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®