From: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@eikelenboom.it>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5] Fixes to Xen pciback for 3.17.
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 19:18:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <373053698.20140825191845@eikelenboom.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53E34102.8030002@citrix.com>
Hi Konrad,
Just in case you forgot this one .. a subtle ping (we are just in the low RC's) :-)
--
Sander
Thursday, August 7, 2014, 11:04:02 AM, you wrote:
> On 06/08/14 20:39, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>>
>> From 00a5b6e3c9ee2c2d605879bdaebc627fa640b024 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
>> Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 16:21:32 -0400
>> Subject: [PATCH] xen/pciback: Restore configuration space when detaching from
>> a guest.
>>
>> The commit 9eea3f7695226f9af9992cebf8e98ac0ad78b277
>> "xen/pciback: Don't deadlock when unbinding." was using
>> the version of pci_reset_function which would lock the device lock.
>> That is no good as we can dead-lock. As such we swapped to using
>> the lock-less version and requiring that the callers
>> of 'pcistub_put_pci_dev' take the device lock. And as such
>> this bug got exposed.
>>
>> Using the lock-less version is OK, except that we tried to
>> use 'pci_restore_state' after the lock-less version of
>> __pci_reset_function_locked - which won't work as 'state_saved'
>> is set to false. Said 'state_saved' is a toggle boolean that
>> is to be used by the sequence of a) pci_save_state/pci_restore_state
>> or b) pci_load_and_free_saved_state/pci_restore_state. We don't
>> want to use a) as the guest might have messed up the PCI
>> configuration space and we want it to revert to the state
>> when the PCI device was binded to us. Therefore we pick
>> b) to restore the configuration space.
>>
>> To still retain the PCI configuration space, we save it once
>> more and store it on our private copy to be restored when:
>> - Device is unbinded from pciback
>> - Device is detached from a guest.
> This should be folded into the original patch.
> [...]
>> --- a/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c
>> +++ b/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c
>> @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ static void pcistub_device_release(struct kref *kref)
>> */
>> __pci_reset_function_locked(dev);
>> if (pci_load_and_free_saved_state(dev, &dev_data->pci_saved_state))
> I dislike testing for errors like this as it looks like it's testing for
> a boolean success. Use
> ret = pci_load_and_free_saved_state(...);
> if (ret < 0)
> ...
> And similarly, below.
>> - dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "Could not reload PCI state\n");
>> + dev_info(&dev->dev, "Could not reload PCI state\n");
> This should be dev_warn().
> pci_load_and_free_saved_state() won't fail because we know the state is
> valid (since we saved it from the device originally). Warning and
> skipping the restore is fine here (and below).
>> else
>> pci_restore_state(dev);
>>
>> @@ -257,6 +257,7 @@ void pcistub_put_pci_dev(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> {
>> struct pcistub_device *psdev, *found_psdev = NULL;
>> unsigned long flags;
>> + struct xen_pcibk_dev_data *dev_data;
>>
>> spin_lock_irqsave(&pcistub_devices_lock, flags);
>>
>> @@ -279,9 +280,25 @@ void pcistub_put_pci_dev(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> * (so it's ready for the next domain)
>> */
>> device_lock_assert(&dev->dev);
>> - __pci_reset_function_locked(dev);
>> - pci_restore_state(dev);
>> -
>> + dev_data = pci_get_drvdata(dev);
>> + if (pci_load_and_free_saved_state(dev, &dev_data->pci_saved_state))
> This should be pci_load_saved_state() and then you can avoid the
> pci_save_state() below.
>> + dev_info(&dev->dev, "Could not reload PCI state\n");
> dev_warn() also.
>> + else {
>> + __pci_reset_function_locked(dev);
>> + /*
>> + * The usual sequence is pci_save_state & pci_restore_state
>> + * but the guest might have messed the configuration space up.
>> + * Use the initial version (when device was binded to us).
> s/binded/bound/
>> + pci_restore_state(dev);
>> + /*
>> + * The next steps are to reload the configuration for the
>> + * next time we bind & unbind to a guest - or unload from
>> + * pciback.
>> + */
>> + pci_save_state(dev);
>> + dev_data->pci_saved_state = pci_store_saved_state(dev);
> You don't need this if you don't free the original state above.
>> + }
>> /* This disables the device. */
>> xen_pcibk_reset_device(dev);
> David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-25 17:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-14 16:18 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-14 16:18 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] xen-pciback: Document the various parameters and attributes in SysFS Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-28 13:04 ` David Vrabel
2014-07-28 14:56 ` Greg KH
2014-08-01 14:59 ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2014-07-14 16:18 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] xen/pciback: Don't deadlock when unbinding Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-28 13:06 ` David Vrabel
2014-08-04 18:42 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-08-05 9:27 ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2014-07-14 16:18 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] driver core: Provide an wrapper around the mutex to do lockdep warnings Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-14 17:39 ` Greg KH
2014-07-14 16:18 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] xen/pciback: Include the domain id if removing the device whilst still in use Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-14 16:18 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] xen/pciback: Print out the domain owning the device Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-14 16:18 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] xen/pciback: Remove tons of dereferences Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-14 17:40 ` [PATCH v5] Fixes to Xen pciback for 3.17 Greg KH
2014-07-14 17:39 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-08-01 15:30 ` David Vrabel
2014-08-04 18:43 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-08-05 8:44 ` [Xen-devel] " Sander Eikelenboom
2014-08-05 9:31 ` David Vrabel
2014-08-05 9:44 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2014-08-05 13:49 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-08-05 14:04 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2014-08-06 18:59 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2014-08-06 19:18 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-08-06 19:25 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2014-08-06 19:39 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-08-06 19:47 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2014-08-06 20:09 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-08-06 20:17 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2014-08-06 22:08 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2014-08-07 9:04 ` David Vrabel
2014-08-25 17:18 ` Sander Eikelenboom [this message]
2014-08-05 14:33 ` Sander Eikelenboom
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=373053698.20140825191845@eikelenboom.it \
--to=linux@eikelenboom.it \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®